Re: [gentoo-user] KAlarm now broken -- suffers many SIGFPE alarms

2006-06-09 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
Yep, that did it.  Kalarm is now happy and behaving itself.Thanks, Jesse.++ kevinOn 6/8/06, Kevin O'Gorman < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 6/8/06, Jesse Hannah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Kevin O'Gorman wrote:> It doesn't die.  And it usually doesn't do it when I'm around, but when I> come> back to

Re: [gentoo-user] KAlarm now broken -- suffers many SIGFPE alarms

2006-06-08 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
On 6/8/06, Jesse Hannah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Kevin O'Gorman wrote:> It doesn't die.  And it usually doesn't do it when I'm around, but when I> come> back to my system in the morning there are usually 200 or so crash dialogs> waiting for me, all indicating the application suffered a SIGFPE (fl

Re: [gentoo-user] KAlarm now broken -- suffers many SIGFPE alarms

2006-06-08 Thread Jesse Hannah
Kevin O'Gorman wrote: > It doesn't die. And it usually doesn't do it when I'm around, but when I > come > back to my system in the morning there are usually 200 or so crash dialogs > waiting for me, all indicating the application suffered a SIGFPE (floating > point error?). But it keeps on worki

[gentoo-user] KAlarm now broken -- suffers many SIGFPE alarms

2006-06-07 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
It doesn't die.  And it usually doesn't do it when I'm around, but when I come back to my system in the morning there are usually 200 or so crash dialogs waiting for me, all indicating the application suffered a SIGFPE (floating point error?).  But it keeps on working anyway. Am I alone with this?