On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 14:42:49 +0100
Mick wrote:
On Saturday, 7 April 2018 14:35:27 BST Floyd Anderson wrote:
Hi Mick,
On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 11:21:23 +0100
Mick wrote:
>So far I had been using gdbm, but I now see that emerge also added lmdb.
Same here, so I gave lmdb a try as hcache backend.
>
On Saturday, 7 April 2018 14:35:27 BST Floyd Anderson wrote:
> Hi Mick,
>
> On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 11:21:23 +0100
>
> Mick wrote:
> >So far I had been using gdbm, but I now see that emerge also added lmdb.
>
> Same here, so I gave lmdb a try as hcache backend.
>
> >Which one is best to use? What
Hi Mick,
On Sat, 07 Apr 2018 11:21:23 +0100
Mick wrote:
So far I had been using gdbm, but I now see that emerge also added lmdb.
Same here, so I gave lmdb a try as hcache backend.
Which one is best to use? What have you chosen?
I assume you mean for speed? I don’t know and it may become v
Hi All,
A mutt update today complained about which database to use for hcache:
!!! Problem resolving dependencies for mail-client/mutt from @selected
.. done!
!!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "mail-client/mutt" has unmet requirements.
- mail-client/mutt-1.9.4-r1::gentoo USE="crypt gd
4 matches
Mail list logo