Hello All.
Although Qt 5 is at a stable version, not so many things have already
migrated to this newer version.
Even the new USE flags, qt4 and qt5 are still not completely capable to
switch to the desired Qt version prior to building, as, for instance,
"dev-util/cmake" and "app-doc/doxygen", I
Hello,
On Mon, 04 Jan 2016, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>On Sunday 03 January 2016 23:50:29 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
>> I cannot work out the correct plural of initramfs!
>
>That's easy - it's initramfses. Well, it would be if there were any such
>word as initramfs. :)
Naahh, can't be. Must be "initramf
On Sunday 03 January 2016 19:10:36 Dale wrote:
> Yea, I got tired of trying to figure out what was called what. The word
> thingy hit me and I use it for the init thingys, thingies, and a few
> other things now. Just don't get me started on hal again. That thingy
> still pisses me off. I need
On Mon, 04 Jan 2016 00:08:21 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > I cannot work out the correct plural of initramfs!
>
> That's easy - it's initramfses. Well, it would be if there were any
> such word as initramfs. :)
Of course there is such a word, you just used it ;-)
--
Neil Bothwick
Someon
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 15:24:35 -0600, Dale wrote:
>
>> I might add, this is why when I read a email, I try to put the most
>> positive light on it. Sometimes even a native English speaker just
>> doesn't quite get the right thing to come out. Add in spelling errors
>> and such
On Sunday 03 January 2016 23:50:29 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> I cannot work out the correct plural of initramfs!
That's easy - it's initramfses. Well, it would be if there were any such
word as initramfs. :)
--
Rgds
Peter
On Sun, 3 Jan 2016 15:24:35 -0600, Dale wrote:
> I might add, this is why when I read a email, I try to put the most
> positive light on it. Sometimes even a native English speaker just
> doesn't quite get the right thing to come out. Add in spelling errors
> and such or someone speaking English
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday 02 January 2016 15:06:37 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> "half as big again" means "50% larger than".
> That is, take the original measure, add one-half of it again and you have
> 1.5 x the original.
>
>> i.e. calculate 50% and add it, making the total 150%.
>> It's a
On Sunday 03 January 2016 14:49:10 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 11:44:37 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > I meant the size of the file.
> >
> > And now I want to add that using 1.5 x the space to represent far less
> > information is a clear indicator of inefficiency.
>
> Efficien
On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 11:08:32 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Welcome to Pedants Anonymous :)
Come on Peter, pedants are anything but anonymous.
We^H^HThey like to nit-pick from the rooftops :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Veni, vermini, vomui
I came, I got ratted, I threw up
pgpPk8KFTpIWc.pgp
Descripti
On Sun, 03 Jan 2016 11:44:37 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > I meant the size of the file.
>
> And now I want to add that using 1.5 x the space to represent far less
> information is a clear indicator of inefficiency.
Efficiency is not everything, readability is often more important.
Otherwi
On Saturday 02 January 2016 15:06:37 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> "half as big again" means "50% larger than".
That is, take the original measure, add one-half of it again and you have
1.5 x the original.
> i.e. calculate 50% and add it, making the total 150%.
> It's an English idiom, so don;t try to
On Sunday 03 Jan 2016 11:44:37 Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday 03 January 2016 11:08:32 I wrote:
> > On Saturday 02 January 2016 12:45:09 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 01:23:28PM +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > > > > you see here. And the qt5 screen shot is half as bi
On Sunday 03 January 2016 11:08:32 I wrote:
> On Saturday 02 January 2016 12:45:09 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> > On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 01:23:28PM +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > > > you see here. And the qt5 screen shot is half as big again as the
> > > > > qt4.
> > > >
> > > > I don't quite
On Saturday 02 January 2016 12:45:09 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 01:23:28PM +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > > you see here. And the qt5 screen shot is half as big again as the
> > > > qt4.
> > >
> > > I don't quite get that.
> >
> > ??
>
> Both images are the same size
On 02/01/2016 13:45, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 01:23:28PM +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
you see here. And the qt5 screen shot is half as big again as the qt4.
>>>
>>> I don't quite get that.
>>
>> ??
>
> Both images are the same size. The usable content area in the
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 01:23:28PM +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > you see here. And the qt5 screen shot is half as big again as the qt4.
> >
> > I don't quite get that.
>
> ??
Both images are the same size. The usable content area in the qt5 screenshot
is far from just half. Maybe the word
On Friday 01 January 2016 11:33:32 lee wrote:
> Peter Humphrey writes:
> > I won't list all my objections here, but I have attached two screen
> > shots of KMail: one in the standard qt4 KDE environment and the other
> > in qt5. You can see how much less compact the qt5 version is, even
> > after
Peter Humphrey writes:
> I won't list all my objections here, but I have attached two screen shots of
> KMail: one in the standard qt4 KDE environment and the other in qt5. You can
> see how much less compact the qt5 version is, even after I've fiddled at some
> length with fonts and qt tweaks
On 31/12/2015 15:37, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> I have not found a Qt5 theme that looks Qt4-esque, but it's totally
>> > possible to do it.
>> >
>> > I think in your case, you should go back to Qt4 until a quality theme is
>> > available for Qt5 that you like. Do keep in mind that Qt4 is already a
>
On Thursday 31 December 2015 13:34:17 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 31/12/2015 13:19, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Hello list,
> >
> > I've built a separate system in spare partitions, using the
> > desktop/plasma profile and the kde overlay, to see how I like it.
> >
> > I don't.
> >
> > I won't list
On Thursday 31 December 2015 12:34:26 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 11:19:28AM +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > I won't list all my objections here, but I have attached two screen
> > shots of KMail: one in the standard qt4 KDE environment and the other
> > in qt5. You can see
On 31/12/2015 13:19, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I've built a separate system in spare partitions, using the desktop/plasma
> profile and the kde overlay, to see how I like it.
>
> I don't.
>
> I won't list all my objections here, but I have attached two screen shots of
> KMail: on
On Thu, Dec 31, 2015 at 11:19:28AM +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> I won't list all my objections here, but I have attached two screen shots of
> KMail: one in the standard qt4 KDE environment and the other in qt5. You can
> see how much less compact the qt5 version is,
> [...]
> you see here. An
Hello,
Recently I started developing on LXQT. As they are using Qt5 on their
developing version I added Qt overlay and unmasked Qt5.
I should add normally I am more the GTK applicatio user, running i3 as
window manager. So Qt and its configuration are kind of new to me.
Anyways, I got LXQT to ru
2014-11-12 12:46 GMT-05:00 Jc García :
> 2014-11-12 11:37 GMT-06:00 siefke_lis...@web.de :
>> Hello,
>>
>> i want install qt5 with the qt overlay. But i become message
>>
>> i686-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--gc-sections
>> -fuse-ld=gold -o ../../../bin/moc .obj/moc.o .obj/preproc
2014-11-12 11:37 GMT-06:00 siefke_lis...@web.de :
> Hello,
>
> i want install qt5 with the qt overlay. But i become message
>
> i686-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--gc-sections -fuse-ld=gold
> -o ../../../bin/moc .obj/moc.o .obj/preprocessor.o .obj/generator.o
> .obj/parser.o .obj/
Hello,
i want install qt5 with the qt overlay. But i become message
i686-pc-linux-gnu-g++ -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,--gc-sections -fuse-ld=gold
-o ../../../bin/moc .obj/moc.o .obj/preprocessor.o .obj/generator.o
.obj/parser.o .obj/token.o .obj/main.o
-L/var/tmp/portage/dev-qt/qtcore-5.4.
For the (QT5) adventurists:
https://github.com/gentoo/qt/tree/master/lxqt-base/lxqt-meta
Bug details at:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525410
enjoy!
James
29 matches
Mail list logo
