Am Donnerstag, 25. Oktober 2012, 22:04:12 schrieb Kerin Millar:
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2012-10-25, Kerin Millarkerfra...@fastmail.co.uk wrote:
The comment you linked to was fairly bereft of technical content,
That comment was from _Ted_Ts'o_ for pete's sake.
I don't care it was from
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann
volkerar...@googlemail.com wrote:
[snip]
and that ONLY two people who did some REALLY stupid stuff to stumble over that
bug are hit by it, should tell you something.
Actually, it seems only *one* person can reliably reproduce this bug:
On 2012-10-25, Kerin Millar kerfra...@fastmail.co.uk wrote:
The comment you linked to was fairly bereft of technical content,
That comment was from _Ted_Ts'o_ for pete's sake.
When Ted T'so blows his nose, it's full of technical content.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards
Grant Edwards wrote:
That comment was from _Ted_Ts'o_ for pete's sake.
When Ted T'so blows his nose, it's full of technical content.
That just made my day. Thanks :)
-- Remy
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2012-10-25, Kerin Millarkerfra...@fastmail.co.uk wrote:
The comment you linked to was fairly bereft of technical content,
That comment was from _Ted_Ts'o_ for pete's sake.
I don't care it was from the heavens upon high. The only remark that was
meaningful in a
On 25/10/12 06:04, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:51 PM, Kerin Millar kerfra...@fastmail.co.uk wrote:
[snip]
On my part, I will continue to be concerned until the investigation has fully
run its course.
That is, of course, your prerogative. I just posted a comment from
6 matches
Mail list logo
