On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 16:43:14 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote:
> Do you know off hand if there are any alternatives?
qdepends -Q pkgname
qdepends is part of portage-utils.
--
Neil Bothwick
Windows: just another pane in the glass
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
2008/11/13 Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Daniel Pielmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> emerge -pv --depclean atom
>
> I realize cryptic answers are the ultimate in cleverness and show
> massive sophistication but how is this used to show dependencies to
> some specific package.
>
> Maybe
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 2:06 AM, Harry Putnam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel Pielmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> With recent changes in portage in the last few mnths, is equery in
> general and `equery depends' in particular still reliable?
I use it fairly often still, but d
Harry Putnam wrote:
Daniel Pielmeier<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
emerge -pv --depclean atom
I realize cryptic answers are the ultimate in cleverness and show
massive sophistication but how is this used to show dependencies to
some specific package.
Maybe a little more detail would keep my l
Iain Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Do you know off hand if there are any alternatives?
>
> dep from app-portage/udept just got recommended to me, but I don't
> know it's trustworthiness either.
Looks promising .. thanks
Daniel Pielmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
With recent changes in portage in the last few mnths, is equery in
general and `equery depends' in particular still reliable?
>>> I use it fairly often still, but do notice I get a lot of null
>>> output. So I no longer trust it fully. At leas
Harry Putnam wrote:
Alan McKinnon<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
On Wednesday 12 November 2008 22:04:52 Harry Putnam wrote:
With recent changes in portage in the last few mnths, is equery in
general and `equery depends' in particular still reliable?
I use it fairly often still, but do notice I g
Harry Putnam schrieb am 12.11.2008 23:43:
> Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> On Wednesday 12 November 2008 22:04:52 Harry Putnam wrote:
>>> With recent changes in portage in the last few mnths, is equery in
>>> general and `equery depends' in particular still reliable?
>> I use it fa
Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Wednesday 12 November 2008 22:04:52 Harry Putnam wrote:
>> With recent changes in portage in the last few mnths, is equery in
>> general and `equery depends' in particular still reliable?
>
> I use it fairly often still, but do notice I get a lot of n
9 matches
Mail list logo
