...@know.eu
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2011 06:40:10
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Kde-meta
On Sunday 07 August 2011, john wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to emerge kde-meta but getting the following error
message
Calculating dependencies
Message-
From: Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 23:53:35
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kde-meta
Francesco Talamona wrote:
On Sunday 07 August 2011, john wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to emerge kde
On Sunday 07 August 2011, john wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to emerge kde-meta but getting the following error
message
Calculating dependencies... done!
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/emerge, line 43, in module
retval = emerge_main()
File
Francesco Talamona wrote:
On Sunday 07 August 2011, john wrote:
Hello,
I am trying to emerge kde-meta but getting the following error
message
Calculating dependencies... done!
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/emerge, line 43, in module
retval = emerge_main()
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerarmin at googlemail.com writes:
6. emerge -DNv kde-meta
Look plausible? Verbose comments are most welcome.
just emerge the kde-4.2 set instead of that meta stuff.
Is there a problem with kde-meta-4.2.0 ? I have many different
users asking for many different
On Mittwoch 11 Februar 2009, james wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerarmin at googlemail.com writes:
6. emerge -DNv kde-meta
Look plausible? Verbose comments are most welcome.
just emerge the kde-4.2 set instead of that meta stuff.
Is there a problem with kde-meta-4.2.0 ? I have
Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon at gmail.com writes:
Volker and Alan,
Finally, try to use sets if possible. The split -meta ebuilds were an ugly
hack until sets made it into portage. They were orders of magnitude better
than monolithic, but sets are just so much cleaner than -meta. Plus you get
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 3:29 PM, James wirel...@tampabay.rr.com wrote:
Alan McKinnon alan.mckinnon at gmail.com writes:
Volker and Alan,
Finally, try to use sets if possible. The split -meta ebuilds were an ugly
hack until sets made it into portage. They were orders of magnitude better
than
Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gentoo at gmail.com writes:
Basically, sets start with @ and you would just emerge like a meta,
emerge @kde-4.2 (or whatever). You can do emerge --list-sets to see
which are available to you. Rather than being meta listed in
/var/lib/portage/world the sets will be
james wrote:
Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gentoo at gmail.com writes:
Basically, sets start with @ and you would just emerge like a meta,
emerge @kde-4.2 (or whatever). You can do emerge --list-sets to see
which are available to you. Rather than being meta listed in
/var/lib/portage/world
On Thursday 12 February 2009 07:01:36 Dale wrote:
Sorry to butt in here. I !think! I get what sets does, you add a group
of packages to a file and then when you do the @sets thing, it
emerges/upgrades that group of packages. I get that part. I guess from
what I am reading that we the user
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 12 February 2009 07:01:36 Dale wrote:
Sorry to butt in here. I !think! I get what sets does, you add a group
of packages to a file and then when you do the @sets thing, it
emerges/upgrades that group of packages. I get that part. I guess from
what I am
* On Jun 2 20:21, Mick (gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org) wrote:
What's the best way to find out what -meta packages exist
eix 'kde.*-meta'
and what they contain?
The KDE website is pretty good for that - see here:
http://kde.org/whatiskde/project.php#distribution
Tom
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org
On 02/06/06, Thomas Kirchner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* On Jun 2 20:21, Mick (gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org) wrote:
What's the best way to find out what -meta packages exist
eix 'kde.*-meta'
and what they contain?
The KDE website is pretty good for that - see here:
14 matches
Mail list logo
