On 05/22 09:06, Adam Carter wrote:
> It happens again.
>
> >
> > Linux kernel 4.11.0 (fetched from ftp.kernel.org mirror)
> >
> > dmesg:
> > [ 3879.147626] encfs[4099]: segfault at 0 ip 0044ca52 sp
> > 7fb17d8d2990 error 4 in encfs[40+95000]
> >
> > Nothing more than this in the dm
It happens again.
>
> Linux kernel 4.11.0 (fetched from ftp.kernel.org mirror)
>
> dmesg:
> [ 3879.147626] encfs[4099]: segfault at 0 ip 0044ca52 sp
> 7fb17d8d2990 error 4 in encfs[40+95000]
>
> Nothing more than this in the dmesg, though.
>
Ok so its crashed. Have you tried rebui
On Sun, 21 May 2017 18:50:50 +0200, Simon Thelen wrote:
> On 17-05-21 at 08:41, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > On 2017-05-21 09:51, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > > Why are you using encfs with the associated FUSE baggage when
> > > ecryptfs is in the kernel and performs the same function?
> > Is ecryptfs
On 2017-05-21 10:01, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2017-05-21 17:59, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
>
> > cryptsetup seems to be of another flavor than encfs, since its depends
> > on gpg (see below), which encfs does not use as far as I know.
> > I think encfs uses symmetric ciphers and cryptsetup uses a pu
On 2017-05-21 17:59, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> cryptsetup seems to be of another flavor than encfs, since its depends
> on gpg (see below), which encfs does not use as far as I know.
> I think encfs uses symmetric ciphers and cryptsetup uses a pub/private
> key pair. But I am by no means a cryptolo
On 17-05-21 at 08:41, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2017-05-21 09:51, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> > Why are you using encfs with the associated FUSE baggage when ecryptfs
> > is in the kernel and performs the same function?
> Is ecryptfs behind the scenes when I run /sbin/cryptsetup ?
No, ecryptfs is a stac
On 05/21 08:41, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2017-05-21 09:51, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> > Why are you using encfs with the associated FUSE baggage when ecryptfs
> > is in the kernel and performs the same function?
>
> Is ecryptfs behind the scenes when I run /sbin/cryptsetup ?
>
> I remember a few
On 2017-05-21 09:51, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Why are you using encfs with the associated FUSE baggage when ecryptfs
> is in the kernel and performs the same function?
Is ecryptfs behind the scenes when I run /sbin/cryptsetup ?
I remember a few years back, still on debian, I resolved to replace my
On 05/21 09:51, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sun, 21 May 2017 10:17:32 +0200, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
>
> > Linux kernel 4.11.0 (fetched from ftp.kernel.org mirror)
> >
> > dmesg:
> > [ 3879.147626] encfs[4099]: segfault at 0 ip 0044ca52 sp
> > 7fb17d8d2990 error 4 in encfs[40+95000]
On Sun, 21 May 2017 10:17:32 +0200, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> Linux kernel 4.11.0 (fetched from ftp.kernel.org mirror)
>
> dmesg:
> [ 3879.147626] encfs[4099]: segfault at 0 ip 0044ca52 sp
> 7fb17d8d2990 error 4 in encfs[40+95000]
>
> Nothing more than this in the dmesg, though.
On 05/21 08:46, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> On 05/21 08:41, Kai Krakow wrote:
> > Am Sun, 21 May 2017 08:15:57 +0200
> > schrieb tu...@posteo.de:
> >
> > > I have a directory mounted via fuse.encfs (encrypted).
> > >
> > > Since kernel 4.11 (seldom, more often with 4.11.1 and 4.11.2) it
> > > happen
On 05/21 08:41, Kai Krakow wrote:
> Am Sun, 21 May 2017 08:15:57 +0200
> schrieb tu...@posteo.de:
>
> > I have a directory mounted via fuse.encfs (encrypted).
> >
> > Since kernel 4.11 (seldom, more often with 4.11.1 and 4.11.2) it
> > happens that once in a sudden the system decides to make the
Am Sun, 21 May 2017 08:15:57 +0200
schrieb tu...@posteo.de:
> I have a directory mounted via fuse.encfs (encrypted).
>
> Since kernel 4.11 (seldom, more often with 4.11.1 and 4.11.2) it
> happens that once in a sudden the system decides to make the
> contents unaccessible:
> 'mount' stills shows
13 matches
Mail list logo
