On Tue, Sep 20 2011, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 13:57:03 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>
>> When revdep-rebuild --library is suggested should we run it
>> before or after the ordinary revdep-rebuild that we typically
>> run after each update world?
>> (That was actually my original
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 13:57:03 -0400, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> When revdep-rebuild --library is suggested should we run it
> before or after the ordinary revdep-rebuild that we typically
> run after each update world?
> (That was actually my original question :-)
You should run it first, because the
On Mon, Sep 19 2011, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>> When revdep-rebuild --library is suggested should we run it
>> before or after the ordinary revdep-rebuild that we typically
>> run after each update world?
>
> I think you should run it with --l
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> When revdep-rebuild --library is suggested should we run it
> before or after the ordinary revdep-rebuild that we typically
> run after each update world?
I think you should run it with --library first. There exists the
possiblity that --l
On Mon, Sep 19 2011, Paul Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>> OK. But the claim was that: if
>> revdep-rebuild
>> with no argument found nothing to build, then
>> revdep-rebuild --library
>> will find nothing.
>
> I think what everyone (except Michael
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19 2011, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
>
> > On Monday, 19. September 2011 10:20:25 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 19 2011, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> >> > revdep-rebuild checks everything, revdep-rebuild --library
> >> >> > checks just some things.
>
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> OK. But the claim was that: if
> revdep-rebuild
> with no argument found nothing to build, then
> revdep-rebuild --library
> will find nothing.
I think what everyone (except Michael S) seems to be confused about is:
Normal revdep-reb
On Monday, 19. September 2011 17:28:26 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:58:52 -0400
>
> Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> > > First one emerges *broken* packages.
> > > Second one emerge packages *using* png14 (not necessarily broken)
> >
> > OK. But the claim was that: if
> >
> >revdep
On Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:58:52 -0400
Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> > First one emerges *broken* packages.
> > Second one emerge packages *using* png14 (not necessarily broken)
>
> OK. But the claim was that: if
>revdep-rebuild
> with no argument found nothing to build, then
>revdep-rebuild --
On Monday, 19. September 2011 10:58:52 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 19 2011, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
> > On Monday, 19. September 2011 10:20:25 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> >> On Mon, Sep 19 2011, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> >> >> > revdep-rebuild checks everything, revdep-rebuild --library
> >>
On Mon, Sep 19 2011, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
> On Monday, 19. September 2011 10:20:25 Allan Gottlieb wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 19 2011, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> >> > revdep-rebuild checks everything, revdep-rebuild --library
>> >> > checks just some things.
>> >> >
>> >> > ebuilds sometimes issu
11 matches
Mail list logo