Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ls date was: Bizarre etc/cfg-update problem [Date issue SOLVED]

2006-01-07 Thread Willie Wong
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 02:41:35AM +0100, Penguin Lover Holly Bostick squawked: > A-HA The 'Info' command, which I also always forget, not least > because I don't know how to navigate info files. > > But this caused me to take another whack at it, and I got along well > enough to find a mostly

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ls date was: Bizarre etc/cfg-update problem [Date issue SOLVED]

2006-01-07 Thread Holly Bostick
Richard Fish schreef: > On 1/7/06, Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Don't think I really need the inodes (if that's what they are, I > > > That is "link count". For a regular file, it tells how many hard > links exist to the file. For a directory, it tells how many files > are in

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ls date was: Bizarre etc/cfg-update problem [Date issue SOLVED]

2006-01-07 Thread Richard Fish
On 1/7/06, Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Don't think I really need the inodes (if that's what they are, I That is "link count". For a regular file, it tells how many hard links exist to the file. For a directory, it tells how many files are in that directory +2, since "." and ".." c

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ls date was: Bizarre etc/cfg-update problem [Date issue SOLVED]

2006-01-07 Thread Holly Bostick
Mariusz Pękala schreef: > On 2006-01-07 20:01:25 +0100 (Sat, Jan), Holly Bostick wrote: > >> Willie Wong schreef: >> >>> On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 04:17:11PM +0100, Penguin Lover Holly >>> Bostick squawked: >>> (how do you get ls to also include the @#$%#$ *year*??) >>> >>> Sorry, couldn't