Re: [gentoo-user] Re: package.provided syntax for overlay

On Monday 20 Feb 2017 13:23:15 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:07:39 +0100, Kai Krakow wrote: > > > > Another option is to copy/symlink the specific package you want > > > > from the bar overlay to your local overlay and do not include the > > > > bar overlay in repos.conf. > > > > >

[gentoo-user] Re: package.provided?

Am Tue, 14 Feb 2017 23:40:37 + schrieb Neil Bothwick : > On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 23:00:03 +0100, Johannes Rosenberger wrote: > > > I find the package.*-dirs very nice, too. Unfortunately, the tools > > like emerge, flaggie etc. seem to not always use the same file to > > write to, so the files g

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: package.provided syntax for overlay

On Mon, 20 Feb 2017 14:07:39 +0100, Kai Krakow wrote: > > > Another option is to copy/symlink the specific package you want > > > from the bar overlay to your local overlay and do not include the > > > bar overlay in repos.conf. > > > > Sorry for being dense. Do you mean first add the overla

[gentoo-user] Re: package.provided syntax for overlay

Am Sun, 19 Feb 2017 10:20:41 + schrieb Mick : > Hi All, > > Given sddm is not working for my setup, as per bug #608690, I thought > of trying entrance from the bar overlay. It wants to pull in > enlightenment, which I have already installed from the main tree and > would like to keep it as s

[gentoo-user] Re: package.provided syntax for overlay

Am Sun, 19 Feb 2017 11:17:11 + schrieb Mick : > On Sunday 19 Feb 2017 10:50:31 Neil Bothwick wrote: > > On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 11:45:27 +0100, Johannes Rosenberger wrote: > [...] > > > > > > According to the portage manpage 'x11-wm/enlightenment-' > > > should be the correct syntax. > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: package.provided?

On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 23:00:03 +0100, Johannes Rosenberger wrote: > I find the package.*-dirs very nice, too. Unfortunately, the tools like > emerge, flaggie etc. seem to not always use the same file to write to, > so the files get messed up over time. Portage always writes to the end of the last

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: package.provided?

On Tue, 14 Feb 2017 15:22:50 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote: > Something else about this entry in `man portage': > > [...] > SYNOPSIS >/etc/portage/make.profile/ or /etc/make.profile/ > site-specific overrides go in /etc/portage/profile/ > deprecated >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: package.provided?

On 14.02.2017 21:22, Harry Putnam wrote: > Johannes Rosenberger writes: > >>> Can anyone offer suggestions about this... is it even the right way to >>> proceed? >>> >>> >> Hello! >> >> I have portage-2.3.3 installed and in my portage manpage it is mentioned: >> >> The file shall reside in etc/(ma

[gentoo-user] Re: package.provided?

Johannes Rosenberger writes: >> Can anyone offer suggestions about this... is it even the right way to >> proceed? >> >> > > Hello! > > I have portage-2.3.3 installed and in my portage manpage it is mentioned: > > The file shall reside in etc/(make.profile|portage/(make.)?profile) and > the synta

[gentoo-user] Re: package.provided messes up emerging of package slots?

On 09/13/2011 01:26 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: On Tuesday, 13. September 2011 01:11:39 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: [...] You cannot provide a slot - you provide a package - freetype in this case. A slot is a gentoo specific thing. So is package.provided :-) Of course :) Point is, you pro

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: package.provided messes up emerging of package slots?

On Tuesday, 13. September 2011 01:11:39 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 09/13/2011 12:18 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > On Monday, 12. September 2011 23:42:30 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > >> On 09/12/2011 10:02 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > >>> On Monday, 12. September 2011 21:31:59 Nikos

[gentoo-user] Re: package.provided messes up emerging of package slots?

On 09/13/2011 12:18 AM, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: On Monday, 12. September 2011 23:42:30 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 09/12/2011 10:02 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: On Monday, 12. September 2011 21:31:59 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 09/12/2011 08:17 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: On

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: package.provided messes up emerging of package slots?

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 23:48:01 +0300 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > If you provide xyz-1.2.3 then portage does not know what *you* did > > to achieve that and makes no attempt to deal with it at all. You are > > expected to completely 100% deal with all of xyz, including all > > slots. "man 5 portage

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: package.provided messes up emerging of package slots?

On Monday, 12. September 2011 23:42:30 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 09/12/2011 10:02 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > On Monday, 12. September 2011 21:31:59 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > >> On 09/12/2011 08:17 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > >>> On Monday, 12. September 2011 20:04:47 Nikos C

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: package.provided messes up emerging of package slots?

On Sep 13, 2011 2:10 AM, "Nikos Chantziaras" wrote: > > On 09/12/2011 08:17 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: >> >> On Monday, 12. September 2011 20:04:47 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >>> >>> On 09/12/2011 07:42 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: On Monday, 12. September 2011 18:41:37 Nikos C

[gentoo-user] Re: package.provided messes up emerging of package slots?

On 09/12/2011 11:31 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 19:49:28 +0300 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 09/12/2011 07:31 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote: On Sep 12, 2011 11:11 PM, "Nikos Chantziaras"mailto:rea...@arcor.de>> wrote: > > In my /etc/portage/profile/package.provided, I have this

[gentoo-user] Re: package.provided messes up emerging of package slots?

On 09/12/2011 10:02 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: On Monday, 12. September 2011 21:31:59 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 09/12/2011 08:17 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: On Monday, 12. September 2011 20:04:47 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 09/12/2011 07:42 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: On

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: package.provided messes up emerging of package slots?

On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 19:49:28 +0300 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 09/12/2011 07:31 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote: > > > > On Sep 12, 2011 11:11 PM, "Nikos Chantziaras" > > wrote: > > > > > > In my /etc/portage/profile/package.provided, I have this: > > > > > > media-libs/fre

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: package.provided messes up emerging of package slots?

On Monday, 12. September 2011 21:31:59 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 09/12/2011 08:17 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > On Monday, 12. September 2011 20:04:47 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > >> On 09/12/2011 07:42 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > >>> On Monday, 12. September 2011 18:41:37 Nikos C

[gentoo-user] Re: package.provided messes up emerging of package slots?

On 09/12/2011 08:17 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: On Monday, 12. September 2011 20:04:47 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 09/12/2011 07:42 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: On Monday, 12. September 2011 18:41:37 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: In my /etc/portage/profile/package.provided, I have this:

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: package.provided messes up emerging of package slots?

On Monday, 12. September 2011 20:04:47 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 09/12/2011 07:42 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: > > On Monday, 12. September 2011 18:41:37 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > >> In my /etc/portage/profile/package.provided, I have this: > >> media-libs/freetype-1.4_pre20080316-r2

[gentoo-user] Re: package.provided messes up emerging of package slots?

On 09/12/2011 07:42 PM, Michael Schreckenbauer wrote: On Monday, 12. September 2011 18:41:37 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: In my /etc/portage/profile/package.provided, I have this: media-libs/freetype-1.4_pre20080316-r2 When I try to emerge freetype however, instead of emerging the newer versio

[gentoo-user] Re: package.provided messes up emerging of package slots?

On 09/12/2011 07:31 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote: On Sep 12, 2011 11:11 PM, "Nikos Chantziaras" mailto:rea...@arcor.de>> wrote: > > In my /etc/portage/profile/package.provided, I have this: > > media-libs/freetype-1.4_pre20080316-r2 > > When I try to emerge freetype however, instead of emerging

[gentoo-user] Re: package.provided syntax

Rumen Yotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: [...] > Hi, > In my case (using it a little but think it works) the file is in other dir: > # cat /etc/portage/profile/package.provided > app-admin/fam-2.7.0-r2 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Oops, package.provided goes in /etc/portage/profile/

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: package.provided syntax

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Harry Putnam wrote: >> The example for package.provided syntax in `man portage` shows categories >> like this: >> >> app-backup/rsnapshot-1.2.2 >> app-backup/bacula-1.48.5 >> app-editors/emacs-cvs-24 > > Ok, I'm a little gun shy to post this now but

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: package.provided syntax

On Monday 06 March 2006 21:09, Harry Putnam wrote: > Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> rsnapshot-1.2.2 > >> bacula-1.48.5 > >> cvs-emacs-24 > > > > The example for package.provided syntax in `man portage` shows categories > > like this: > > > > app-backup/rsnapshot-1.2.2 > > app-bac

[gentoo-user] Re: package.provided syntax

Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> rsnapshot-1.2.2 >> bacula-1.48.5 >> cvs-emacs-24 > > The example for package.provided syntax in `man portage` shows categories > like this: > > app-backup/rsnapshot-1.2.2 > app-backup/bacula-1.48.5 > app-editors/emacs-cvs-24 Ok, I'm a little gun sh

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: package.provided syntax

On Tuesday 07 March 2006 07:51, Harry Putnam wrote: > >> cvs-emacs-24 > [ebuild U ] app-editors/emacs-cvs-22.0.50-r1 notice anything about the versions? the dependancy is obviously version specific, so yuor provision will need to be also -- We are upping our standards ... so up yours.

[gentoo-user] Re: package.provided syntax

Dave Nebinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Harry Putnam wrote: >> in package.provided: >> cvs-emacs-24 > > [snip] > >> emerge -vuDp app-editors/emacs-cvs > > Don't you see that cvs-emacs is not the same as emacs-cvs, or was this > just a typo on your part? I thought it was a brain-dead case of

[gentoo-user] Re: package.provided syntax

Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > app-backup/rsnapshot-1.2.2 > app-backup/bacula-1.48.5 > app-editors/emacs-cvs-24 Haa there it is Another dopey message was sent before I saw this, and the real sorry part is that I've been caught by this before and not too long ago. I've recently don

[gentoo-user] Re: package.provided syntax

Dave Nebinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Harry Putnam wrote: >> in package.provided: >> cvs-emacs-24 > > [snip] > >> emerge -vuDp app-editors/emacs-cvs > > Don't you see that cvs-emacs is not the same as emacs-cvs, or was this > just a typo on your part? Gack.. not a typo a braino -- gento