Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
I don't know what 'upgrade guide' you have read, but:
The gcc upgrade doc. The one, to which there is a link in the GWN.
Which part of the upgrade guide did you not follw?
I followed the part, which said, that no additional work was required. The
part, which is
Richard Fish wrote:
On 5/27/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And also pardon me, when I'm annoyed because of too bold statements
which turn out to be wrong. If it says no problems expected, then
that's what I expect. I don't expect to run into deep problems. And
the GWN and upgrade
On 5/27/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if he does not have glib?
Then he installs it.
so, he should install something he does not need and 'test' it, to satisfy
your needs?
Not MY needs, no. But to be able to say that all is fine, when it has been
posted here, that glib is one
On Sat, 27 May 2006 13:29:01 -0700, Richard Fish wrote:
Did you yet re-compile Qt 3 and Qt 4? No?
For the sake of argument, I just did. Guess what? The only bad
thing that happened is my KDE theme went away. No big deal, I've seen
it before when upgrading qt, and although I'm not sure
On Sunday 28 May 2006 07:53, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
I don't know what 'upgrade guide' you have read, but:
The gcc upgrade doc. The one, to which there is a link in the GWN.
Which part of the upgrade guide did you not follw?
I followed the part, which said,
On Sunday 28 May 2006 07:55, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Richard Fish wrote:
On 5/27/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And also pardon me, when I'm annoyed because of too bold statements
which turn out to be wrong. If it says no problems expected, then
that's what I expect. I don't
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 22:31:18 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
No, see this weeks Gentoo Weekly Newsletter.
To upgrade to the new version (assuming you are using gcc-3.4), all
that is required is to upgrade GCC and then select the new profile
using gcc-config.
Wrong. An
On Sat, 27 May 2006 07:54:44 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
and KDE continued to
work.
Not here.
I've had a few strange errors since posting that. Like one from Konqueror
when trying to load a page, which then loaded perfectly on the next try.
Maybe i've not run one of the affected
On Sat, 27 May 2006, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 27 May 2006 07:54:44 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
and KDE continued to
work.
Not here.
I've had a few strange errors since posting that. Like one from Konqueror
when trying to load a page, which then loaded perfectly on the next
On 5/27/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gcc update Nothing needs to be done Sure... How much did the
person who wrote this check? Hello World! worked, and that's it?
Sometimes this complete lack of QA is really pissing me off :(
Stop using ~arch packages, or stop whining.
Richard Fish wrote:
On 5/27/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gcc update Nothing needs to be done Sure... How much did the
person who wrote this check? Hello World! worked, and that's it?
Sometimes this complete lack of QA is really pissing me off :(
Stop using ~arch packages,
On Saturday 27 May 2006 19:58, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Richard Fish wrote:
On 5/27/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gcc update Nothing needs to be done Sure... How much did the
person who wrote this check? Hello World! worked, and that's it?
Sometimes this complete lack
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Saturday 27 May 2006 19:58, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Richard Fish wrote:
On 5/27/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gcc update Nothing needs to be done Sure... How much did the
person who wrote this check? Hello World! worked, and that's it?
On 5/27/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stop using ~arch packages, or stop whining.
No, I won't do neither. The GWN and the upgrade doc used to say,
that an upgrade is (basically) riskless.
Well I can't force you to do anything. You found a problem, reported
a bug, and got the
I don't know what 'upgrade guide' you have read, but:
Now let's rebuild toolchain and then world so we will make use of the new
compiler.
Code Listing 2.2: Rebuilding system
# emerge -eav system
# emerge -eav world
and glibc is part of the system.
Which part of the upgrade guide did you
On 5/27/06, Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 27 May 2006 19:58, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Did you try to compile glib? No? Then I guess you've done no testing.
if he does not have glib?
To be fair, I did mention mozilla, so it is safe to assume that I have
gtk and glib
On 5/27/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And also pardon me, when I'm annoyed because of too bold statements
which turn out to be wrong. If it says no problems expected, then
that's what I expect. I don't expect to run into deep problems. And
the GWN and upgrade doc clearly stated,
Saturday 27 May 2006 19:58 skrev Alexander Skwar:
gcc update Nothing needs to be done Sure... How much did the
person who wrote this check? Hello World! worked, and that's it?
What exactly do you intend to achieve by flaming the devs?
Sometimes this complete lack of QA is really
Hello!
Is it required to do a emerge -e world when upgrading to gcc 4.1 from
gcc 3.4.6?
Alexander Skwar
--
Life is like an egg stain on your chin -- you can lick it, but it still
won't go away.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hello!
Is it required to do a emerge -e world when upgrading to gcc 4.1 from
gcc 3.4.6?
I don't think so.
http://www.gentoo.org/news/en/gwn/20060522-newsletter.xml
| To upgrade to the new version (assuming you are using gcc-3.4), all
| that is required is to upgrade
Christian Limberg wrote:
just to clarify. Uprading GCC means in this case - emerging gcc-4.1 und
*removing* gcc-3.4?
That's not what I meant - I would have gcc-4.1 and gcc-3.4 installed
in parallel and switch to gcc-4.1 using gcc-config.
So, all the packages compiled with gcc-3.4 will
Hi,
On Fri, 26 May 2006 16:01:14 +0200 Alexander Skwar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course. You don't need to have gcc installed to be able to
run a *compiled* program.
but one might want to have the libstdc++ and libgcj installed that
came with the compiler for the case that C++/Java programs
On Fri, 26 May 2006 17:12:20 +0200, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
but one might want to have the libstdc++ and libgcj installed that
came with the compiler for the case that C++/Java programs should
continue to run. So quickpkging the old GCC is probably not a bad
idea until revdep-rebuild took
On 26 May 2006 15:01, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Christian Limberg wrote:
just to clarify. Uprading GCC means in this case - emerging gcc-4.1 und
*removing* gcc-3.4?
That's not what I meant - I would have gcc-4.1 and gcc-3.4 installed
in parallel and switch to gcc-4.1 using gcc-config.
So,
Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 26 May 2006 09:46:24 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Is it required to do a emerge -e world when upgrading to gcc 4.1 from
gcc 3.4.6?
No, see this weeks Gentoo Weekly Newsletter.
To upgrade to the new version (assuming you are using gcc-3.4), all
that is
On Fri, 26 May 2006 22:31:18 +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
No, see this weeks Gentoo Weekly Newsletter.
To upgrade to the new version (assuming you are using gcc-3.4), all
that is required is to upgrade GCC and then select the new profile
using gcc-config.
Wrong. An emerge -e world
26 matches
Mail list logo
