On Monday, 8 June 2020 10:18:30 BST Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 08 Jun 2020 10:12:30 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > > @world includes @system. It doesn't necessarily include everything
> > > installed on your system though.
> >
> > Eh? Do you mean we might have things installed other than
On Mon, 08 Jun 2020 10:12:30 +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > @world includes @system. It doesn't necessarily include everything
> > installed on your system though.
>
> Eh? Do you mean we might have things installed other than via portage?
> Otherwise, isn't everything on the system
On Sunday, 7 June 2020 22:16:39 BST Rich Freeman wrote:
> @world includes @system. It doesn't necessarily include everything
> installed on your system though.
Eh? Do you mean we might have things installed other than via portage?
Otherwise, isn't everything on the system represented in either
n952162 wrote:
> On 2020-06-07 23:37, Dale wrote:
>> J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>>
>>> You need to add "-1" or "--oneshot".
>>>
>>> As this has been used, I would definitely expect the world-file to be full
>>> of this, causing issues with updates later.
>>>
>>> Also, by restricting to @system, any
On 2020-06-07 23:37, Dale wrote:
J. Roeleveld wrote:
You need to add "-1" or "--oneshot".
As this has been used, I would definitely expect the world-file to be full of
this, causing issues with updates later.
Also, by restricting to @system, any packages not in @system with a restriction
J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
> You need to add "-1" or "--oneshot".
>
> As this has been used, I would definitely expect the world-file to be full of
> this, causing issues with updates later.
>
> Also, by restricting to @system, any packages not in @system with a
> restriction on readline V8 will
Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 5:07 PM Dale wrote:
>>
>> Unless you have a really good reason to do so, you shouldn't try to update
>> system by itself. It limits emerge and can lead to issues.
> He's just following my earlier advice. While what you say is true in
> general, the
On 7 June 2020 21:30:19 CEST, Rich Freeman wrote:
>On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 2:56 PM n952162 wrote:
>>
>>
>> $ equery list \* | grep readline
>> sys-libs/readline-7.0_p5-r1
>>
>> But, given your answer about exclusivity/inclusivity in the other
>thread, I guess this result is
So try the same command but use -epv and it will tell you everything it's
going to do.
If you have a dependency issue it will tell you straight up.
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 2:15 PM n952162 wrote:
> On 2020-06-07 23:03, Mark Knecht wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 1:20 PM n952162 wrote:
>
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 5:07 PM Dale wrote:
>
>
> Unless you have a really good reason to do so, you shouldn't try to update
> system by itself. It limits emerge and can lead to issues.
He's just following my earlier advice. While what you say is true in
general, the problem is that he is
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 3:38 PM n952162 wrote:
>
> I don't understand this - what can I add to @system to get @system to update?
>
> Ah, you mean that since readline is used by ~@system packages ... I'll try
> @world ... oh, that's not inclusive of @system, perhaps.
@world includes @system. It
On 2020-06-07 23:03, Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 1:20 PM n952162 mailto:n952...@web.de>> wrote:
> I don't understand this - what can I add to @system to get @system
to update?
emerge -e @system
--emptytree, -e
Reinstalls target atoms and their entire
n952162 wrote:
> On 2020-06-07 21:30, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 2:56 PM n952162 wrote:
>>
>>> The emerge that I used was this:
>>>
>>> emerge -auDv --verbose-conflicts --changed-use --keep-going --with-bdeps=y
>>> --changed-deps --backtrack=100 @system
>> Yeah, you might have
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 1:20 PM n952162 wrote:
> I don't understand this - what can I add to @system to get @system to
update?
emerge -e @system
On 2020-06-07 21:30, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 2:56 PM n952162 wrote:
$ equery list \* | grep readline
sys-libs/readline-7.0_p5-r1
But, given your answer about exclusivity/inclusivity in the other thread, I
guess this result is questionable...
This is just
On 2020-06-07 21:30, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 2:56 PM n952162 wrote:
The emerge that I used was this:
emerge -auDv --verbose-conflicts --changed-use --keep-going --with-bdeps=y
--changed-deps --backtrack=100 @system
Yeah, you might have to include the other packages that
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 2:56 PM n952162 wrote:
>
>
> $ equery list \* | grep readline
> sys-libs/readline-7.0_p5-r1
>
> But, given your answer about exclusivity/inclusivity in the other thread, I
> guess this result is questionable...
This is just showing what version you have
On 2020-06-07 20:33, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 2:16 PM n952162 wrote:
When I try to update @system after --sync-ing, I get a conflict on readline.
Bash wants readline 8.0 but the profile specifies readline 7.0 and lots of
other packages are linked against 7.0. Just
On Sun, Jun 7, 2020 at 2:16 PM n952162 wrote:
>
> When I try to update @system after --sync-ing, I get a conflict on readline.
>
> Bash wants readline 8.0 but the profile specifies readline 7.0 and lots of
> other packages are linked against 7.0. Just rebuilding those packages
> probably won't
When I try to update @system after --sync-ing, I get a conflict on
/readline/.
/Bash/ wants /readline/ 8.0 but the profile specifies /readline/ 7.0 and
lots of other packages are linked against 7.0. Just rebuilding those
packages probably won't help, because they don't know about /readline/
20 matches
Mail list logo
