But that would only allow you to have two kernels laying around. Right
now I have these:
r...@smoker / # ls /boot/bzImage-2*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2355440 Jan 31 18:52 /boot/bzImage-2-28-r8-1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2460088 Jan 2 20:13 /boot/bzImage-2.6.23-r8-7
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root
Steven Lembark wrote:
But that would only allow you to have two kernels laying around. Right
now I have these:
r...@smoker / # ls /boot/bzImage-2*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2355440 Jan 31 18:52 /boot/bzImage-2-28-r8-1
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2460088 Jan 2 20:13 /boot/bzImage-2.6.23-r8-7
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 03:23:56 +
Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
make all modules_install install
Which also, as a nice bonus, backs up your kernel config too.
Does this not also add the system.map file a couple of others to /
boot ?
I think I tried this /or
On Mon, 2 Feb 2009 03:23:56 +, Stroller wrote:
Which also, as a nice bonus, backs up your kernel config too.
Does this not also add the system.map file a couple of others to /
boot ?
It add three files, the kernel, the config and System map. The first is
needed, the second is
Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Dale wrote:
Hi,
I just rebuilt a newer kernel and noticed something. It seems bzImage
has moved from arch/i386/boot/bzImage to arch/x86/boot/bzImage. When
did this happen? Is x86 the same as i386?
yes. They merged the
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 1:32 PM, KH gentoo-u...@konstantinhansen.de wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Dale wrote:
Hi,
I just rebuilt a newer kernel and noticed something. It seems bzImage
has moved from arch/i386/boot/bzImage to arch/x86/boot/bzImage. When
I am running amd64 using 2.6.27-gentoo-r8 and in arch there still is x86
an x86_64. Am I doing anything wrong or did I just missanderstand you?
kh
cd in there and look around. x86_64 only has a boot directory and when
you look at the bzImage file in it you find it's a link to
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 1:32 PM, KH gentoo-u...@konstantinhansen.de wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Dale wrote:
Hi,
I just rebuilt a newer kernel and noticed something. It seems bzImage
has moved from
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 1:32 PM, KH gentoo-u...@konstantinhansen.de wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Dale wrote:
Hi,
I just rebuilt a newer kernel and noticed something.
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 2:03 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 1:32 PM, KH gentoo-u...@konstantinhansen.de wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Dale wrote:
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:08:25 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Basically I build the kernel using make make modules_install and
then copy the kernel by hand using
cp arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage /boot/bzImage-2.6.27-gentoo-r8
or whatever the kernel is. I add that to grub.conf and I'm done. works
for
Basically I build the kernel using make make modules_install and
then copy the kernel by hand
Good god. So I'm not alone in being a dumbass :)
And I was getting really worried that I had made a fool of myself by
posting earlier and admitting my 'stupidity' ;)
Coming from debian, with all that
On 2 Feb 2009, at 01:05, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:08:25 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Basically I build the kernel using make make modules_install and
then copy the kernel by hand using
cp arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage /boot/bzImage-2.6.27-gentoo-r8
or whatever the kernel is. I
Stroller wrote:
On 2 Feb 2009, at 01:05, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sun, 1 Feb 2009 15:08:25 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Basically I build the kernel using make make modules_install and
then copy the kernel by hand using
cp arch/x86_64/boot/bzImage /boot/bzImage-2.6.27-gentoo-r8
or whatever
On 2 Feb 2009, at 03:46, Dale wrote:
...
I think I tried this /or genkernel when I looked at /boot I found
they'd littered the place with clutter.
I hope you won't be offended, but the amount of junk files this added
made me want to barf.
I have avoided any such complications since,
Stroller wrote:
On 2 Feb 2009, at 03:46, Dale wrote:
...
I think I tried this /or genkernel when I looked at /boot I found
they'd littered the place with clutter.
I hope you won't be offended, but the amount of junk files this added
made me want to barf.
I have avoided any such
Hi,
I just rebuilt a newer kernel and noticed something. It seems bzImage
has moved from arch/i386/boot/bzImage to arch/x86/boot/bzImage. When
did this happen? Is x86 the same as i386?
I'm just wanting to make sure I am not going to blow up something when I
boot that thing.
Thanks
Dale
:-)
On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Dale wrote:
Hi,
I just rebuilt a newer kernel and noticed something. It seems bzImage
has moved from arch/i386/boot/bzImage to arch/x86/boot/bzImage. When
did this happen? Is x86 the same as i386?
yes. They merged the '386' and the amd64/x86_64 architecture
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Dale wrote:
Hi,
I just rebuilt a newer kernel and noticed something. It seems bzImage
has moved from arch/i386/boot/bzImage to arch/x86/boot/bzImage. When
did this happen? Is x86 the same as i386?
yes. They merged the
On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Dale wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Dale wrote:
Hi,
I just rebuilt a newer kernel and noticed something. It seems bzImage
has moved from arch/i386/boot/bzImage to arch/x86/boot/bzImage. When
did this happen? Is x86 the
On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Dale wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Dale wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Sonntag 01 Februar 2009, Dale wrote:
Hi,
I just rebuilt a newer kernel and noticed something. It seems bzImage
has moved from
21 matches
Mail list logo
