On Saturday 18 December 2010 14:40:07 Mick wrote:
> On 30 November 2010 11:11, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Monday 29 November 2010 18:20:56 Mick wrote:
> >> Will wait for 2.6.36 series to see if this old PIII will work.
> >
> > I'm running 2.6.36-r3 at the moment. You only have to add a keyword
On 30 November 2010 11:11, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Monday 29 November 2010 18:20:56 Mick wrote:
>
>> Will wait for 2.6.36 series to see if this old PIII will work.
>
> I'm running 2.6.36-r3 at the moment. You only have to add a keyword to
> gentoo-sources.
Just compiled gentoo-2.6.36-r5.
Unfo
On Monday 29 November 2010 18:20:56 Mick wrote:
> Will wait for 2.6.36 series to see if this old PIII will work.
I'm running 2.6.36-r3 at the moment. You only have to add a keyword to
gentoo-sources.
BtW, is it really necessary to quote the entire thread in every post?
--
Rgds
Peter.
On Monday 29 November 2010 15:17:42 Dale wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > On 29 November 2010 13:41, Dale wrote:
> >> Mick wrote:
> >>> Ughh! Spoke too soon. :-(
> >>>
> >>> The older PIII machine still crashes in the same manner. This is what
> >>>
> >>> I have configured:
> >>> $ cat /usr/src/li
Mick wrote:
On 29 November 2010 13:41, Dale wrote:
Mick wrote:
Ughh! Spoke too soon. :-(
The older PIII machine still crashes in the same manner. This is what
I have configured:
$ cat /usr/src/linux/.config | grep -i CONFIG_ATA
# CONFIG_ATALK is not set
# CONFIG_ATA_OVER_ETH
On 29 November 2010 13:41, Dale wrote:
> Mick wrote:
>>
>> Ughh! Spoke too soon. :-(
>>
>> The older PIII machine still crashes in the same manner. This is what
>> I have configured:
>>
>> $ cat /usr/src/linux/.config | grep -i CONFIG_ATA
>> # CONFIG_ATALK is not set
>> # CONFIG_ATA_OVER_ETH
Mick wrote:
Ughh! Spoke too soon. :-(
The older PIII machine still crashes in the same manner. This is what
I have configured:
$ cat /usr/src/linux/.config | grep -i CONFIG_ATA
# CONFIG_ATALK is not set
# CONFIG_ATA_OVER_ETH is not set
CONFIG_ATA=y
# CONFIG_ATA_NONSTANDARD is not set
# C
On 29 November 2010 10:30, Mick wrote:
> On Monday 29 November 2010 09:01:37 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>> On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:30:46 +, Mick wrote:
>> > $ cat /usr/src/linux/.config | grep -i CONFIG_ATA
>> > # CONFIG_ATALK is not set
>> > # CONFIG_ATA_OVER_ETH is not set
>> > CONFIG_ATA=y
>> > #
On Monday 29 November 2010 09:01:37 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:30:46 +, Mick wrote:
> > $ cat /usr/src/linux/.config | grep -i CONFIG_ATA
> > # CONFIG_ATALK is not set
> > # CONFIG_ATA_OVER_ETH is not set
> > CONFIG_ATA=y
> > # CONFIG_ATA_NONSTANDARD is not set
> > # CONFIG_A
On Mon, 29 Nov 2010 08:30:46 +, Mick wrote:
> $ cat /usr/src/linux/.config | grep -i CONFIG_ATA
> # CONFIG_ATALK is not set
> # CONFIG_ATA_OVER_ETH is not set
> CONFIG_ATA=y
> # CONFIG_ATA_NONSTANDARD is not set
> # CONFIG_ATA_VERBOSE_ERROR is not set
> CONFIG_ATA_ACPI=y
> # CONFIG_ATA_SFF is
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Mick wrote:
> On Monday 29 November 2010 06:42:26 Petri Rosenström wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
>> > On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Mick wrote:
>> >> On Saturday 27 November 2010 17:53:21 Mark Knecht wrote:
>> >>> On Sat, Nov
On Monday 29 November 2010 06:42:26 Petri Rosenström wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Mick wrote:
> >> On Saturday 27 November 2010 17:53:21 Mark Knecht wrote:
> >>> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Mick wrote:
> >>> > On Saturday
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 8:50 PM, Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Mick wrote:
>> On Saturday 27 November 2010 17:53:21 Mark Knecht wrote:
>>> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Mick wrote:
>>> > On Saturday 27 November 2010 15:17:43 Mark Knecht wrote:
>>> >> On Sat, Nov 27, 2
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 27 November 2010 17:53:21 Mark Knecht wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Mick wrote:
>> > On Saturday 27 November 2010 15:17:43 Mark Knecht wrote:
>> >> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Mick wrote:
>> >> > I haven't had much luc
On Saturday 27 November 2010 17:53:21 Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Mick wrote:
> > On Saturday 27 November 2010 15:17:43 Mark Knecht wrote:
> >> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Mick wrote:
> >> > I haven't had much luck with the 2.6.35 version of kernels - they have
> >>
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 27 November 2010 15:17:43 Mark Knecht wrote:
>> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Mick wrote:
>> > I haven't had much luck with the 2.6.35 version of kernels - they have
>> > cause panics on two different x86 boxen.
>> >
>> > Now that 2.6.
On Saturday 27 November 2010 15:17:43 Mark Knecht wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Mick wrote:
> > I haven't had much luck with the 2.6.35 version of kernels - they have
> > cause panics on two different x86 boxen.
> >
> > Now that 2.6.35 has gone stable so I tried it again and I'm getti
On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Mick wrote:
> I haven't had much luck with the 2.6.35 version of kernels - they have
> cause panics on two different x86 boxen.
>
> Now that 2.6.35 has gone stable so I tried it again and I'm getting a
> kernel panic complaining about VFS unable to mount root fs:
>
I haven't had much luck with the 2.6.35 version of kernels - they have
cause panics on two different x86 boxen.
Now that 2.6.35 has gone stable so I tried it again and I'm getting a
kernel panic complaining about VFS unable to mount root fs:
==
VFS: Cannot open roo
19 matches
Mail list logo
