Re: [gentoo-user] localmount before fsck: e2fsck complaining

2009-02-02 Thread reQuiem23
Dirk Heinrichs-2 wrote: > > Am Montag, 2. Februar 2009 14:03:29 schrieb reQuiem23: > >> when i remove checkfs, though, it >> would not solve the problem of localmount being run before fsck, would >> it? > > Sure it would. > >> the mounted /home part could still not be scanned, i suppose. am

Re: [gentoo-user] localmount before fsck: e2fsck complaining

2009-02-02 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Montag, 2. Februar 2009 14:03:29 schrieb reQuiem23: > when i remove checkfs, though, it > would not solve the problem of localmount being run before fsck, would it? Sure it would. > the mounted /home part could still not be scanned, i suppose. am i wrong > here? Yes. Bye... Dirk

Re: [gentoo-user] localmount before fsck: e2fsck complaining

2009-02-02 Thread reQuiem23
Bugzilla from en.a...@gmail.com wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > reQuiem23 wrote: >> hi all, >> >> i just noticed some warnings in my bootup process. the order of the >> services >> in question is checkfs - localmount - fsck. however, checkfs does the >> pending

[gentoo-user] localmount before fsck: e2fsck complaining

2009-02-01 Thread reQuiem23
hi all, i just noticed some warnings in my bootup process. the order of the services in question is checkfs - localmount - fsck. however, checkfs does the pending file system checks already before the partitions are mounted, so why is there another service "fsck" which seems to do just the same?