On Sat, Jun 21 2014, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 21:20:52 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
The moral is always look for portage trying to downgrade packages and
add the appropriate keyword entries when using this approach.
The only issue with this is that you never get back to
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 21:20:52 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
The moral is always look for portage trying to downgrade packages and
add the appropriate keyword entries when using this approach.
The only issue with this is that you never get back to stable that way.
You will, it just takes a
On 20/06/2014 00:22, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19 2014, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 19/06/2014 21:17, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
There are a few more again with no parents Then comes one that I
can't understand
virtual/libintl:0
(virtual/libintl-0-r1::gentoo, ebuild
On 20/06/2014 00:22, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19 2014, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 19/06/2014 21:17, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
There are a few more again with no parents Then comes one that I
can't understand
virtual/libintl:0
(virtual/libintl-0-r1::gentoo, ebuild
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 13:33:26 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
These dependency chains can get long and complex, so best is usually to
look at the whole thing and see exactly what is going on. Most often you
have something in world that is keyworded, or the current version is
still ~arch
Another
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
The moral is always look for portage trying to downgrade packages and add
the appropriate keyword entries when using this approach.
The only issue with this is that you never get back to stable that way.
What I usually
(I am in the months long process of converting from testing to stable,
using the bothwick going stable method; but I don't believe that is
related to the question I am asking.)
I was away for several days and have a number of problem with my
normally-daily update world. Some may be due to the
On 19/06/2014 21:17, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
(I am in the months long process of converting from testing to stable,
using the bothwick going stable method; but I don't believe that is
related to the question I am asking.)
I was away for several days and have a number of problem with my
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
First thing: I understand why you want to go testing - stable, but at
least leave portage unstable. A *lot* of ancient stuff has been fixed in
~arch, it's perfectly safe and robust, and most especially all that
On 19/06/2014 23:20, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
First thing: I understand why you want to go testing - stable, but at
least leave portage unstable. A *lot* of ancient stuff has been fixed in
~arch, it's perfectly safe and
On Thu, Jun 19 2014, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 19/06/2014 21:17, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote:
There are a few more again with no parents Then comes one that I
can't understand
virtual/libintl:0
(virtual/libintl-0-r1::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled in by
11 matches
Mail list logo
