Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On 03/04/2017 10:51 PM, J. Roeleveld wrote: > On March 4, 2017 11:01:38 PM GMT+01:00, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> >> I'm stuck upgrading to "dev-db/mysql-5.6.35" >> >> make: *** [Makefile:150: all] Error 2 >> * ERROR: dev-db/mysql-5.6.35::gentoo failed (compile phase): >> * emake failed >>

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On March 4, 2017 11:01:38 PM GMT+01:00, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >I'm stuck upgrading to "dev-db/mysql-5.6.35" > >make: *** [Makefile:150: all] Error 2 > * ERROR: dev-db/mysql-5.6.35::gentoo failed (compile phase): > * emake failed > * >* If you need support, post the output of `emerge

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On 03/04/2017 03:01 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > I'm stuck upgrading to "dev-db/mysql-5.6.35" > > make: *** [Makefile:150: all] Error 2 > * ERROR: dev-db/mysql-5.6.35::gentoo failed (compile phase): > * emake failed > * [snip] I advanced a bit, now I'm getting: make: ***

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

I'm stuck upgrading to "dev-db/mysql-5.6.35" make: *** [Makefile:150: all] Error 2 * ERROR: dev-db/mysql-5.6.35::gentoo failed (compile phase): * emake failed * * If you need support, post the output of `emerge --info '=dev-db/mysql-5.6.35::gentoo'`, * the complete build log and the

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On Sun, 5 Feb 2017 13:02:01 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > >=sys-fs/eudev-1.3 required by (virtual/udev-215:0/0::gentoo, > > >installed) > > > > (sys-fs/udev-225-r1:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge) pulled > > in by > >>

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On 02/05/2017 12:52 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > On 02/04/2017 03:20 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 00:47:24 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> >>> !!! existing preserved libs: >> package: sys-libs/ncurses-5.9-r5 >>> * - /usr/lib64/libpanelw.so.5 >>> * -

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On 02/04/2017 03:20 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 00:47:24 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >> !!! existing preserved libs: > package: sys-libs/ncurses-5.9-r5 >> * - /usr/lib64/libpanelw.so.5 >> * - /usr/lib64/libpanelw.so.5.9 >> * used >> by >>

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On Sat, 4 Feb 2017 00:47:24 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > !!! existing preserved libs: > >>> package: sys-libs/ncurses-5.9-r5 > * - /usr/lib64/libpanelw.so.5 > * - /usr/lib64/libpanelw.so.5.9 > * used > by >

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On 01/29/2017 01:56 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months). My next box is giving me hard time as well. It keeps reinstalling OpenOffice in circle: >>> Installing (1 of 1) app-office/openoffice-bin-4.1.2::gentoo * Updating desktop

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On my other system (one year old as well, without upgrades) I'm having problem with python. I was getting an error: dev-lang/python-2.7.10-r4:2.7 (">> Installing (1 of 5) dev-lang/python-3.4.5::gentoo >>> neededobj /usr/lib64/libpython3.4.so.1.0 Traceback (most recent call last): File

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On 01/29/2017 01:56 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months). [snip] The upgrade after 1-year was mainly successful, with all your help, THANK YOU! Only two miner glitches: 1.) Failed to set XATTR_PAX markings -me But I'm not the

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On Wed, 01 Feb 2017 18:52:59 +, Mick wrote: > > > >You run perl-cleaner after updating perl, you need to cleanse your > > > >world > > > >file before you update perl. > > > > > > Perl-cleaner does the cleansing as well these days. Which is > > > extremely convenient. > > > > Does it?

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On Wednesday 01 Feb 2017 08:39:18 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 01 Feb 2017 06:57:25 +, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > >> I'm trying my luck with: perl-cleaner all > > > > > >You run perl-cleaner after updating perl, you need to cleanse your > > >world > > >file before you update perl. > > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On Wed, 01 Feb 2017 06:57:25 +, J. Roeleveld wrote: > >> I'm trying my luck with: perl-cleaner all > > > >You run perl-cleaner after updating perl, you need to cleanse your > >world > >file before you update perl. > > Perl-cleaner does the cleansing as well these days. Which is extremely

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On February 1, 2017 1:59:27 AM GMT+01:00, Neil Bothwick wrote: >On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:54:22 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >> > A number of perl modules have gone from being separate packages to >> > part of the core perl distribution (this was covered in a news

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:54:22 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > A number of perl modules have gone from being separate packages to > > part of the core perl distribution (this was covered in a news item). > > You need to make sure there are no perl packages have crept into > > @world, which

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On 01/31/2017 05:36 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:19:01 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >> How do I solve this perl dependency? I was always confused about these >> dependencies. >> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been >> pulled !!!

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 17:19:01 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > How do I solve this perl dependency? I was always confused about these > dependencies. > !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been > pulled !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On 01/31/2017 04:35 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:24:21 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >> When I try to exclude the "dev-ruby/racc: >> emerge -uDNavq --exclude dev-libs/icu --exclude dev-libs/boost >> --exclude dev-ruby/racc world >> >> I'm getting another error: > >

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On 01/31/2017 04:35 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:24:21 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >> When I try to exclude the "dev-ruby/racc: >> emerge -uDNavq --exclude dev-libs/icu --exclude dev-libs/boost >> --exclude dev-ruby/racc world >> >> I'm getting another error: > >

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On Tue, 31 Jan 2017 16:24:21 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > When I try to exclude the "dev-ruby/racc: > emerge -uDNavq --exclude dev-libs/icu --exclude dev-libs/boost > --exclude dev-ruby/racc world > > I'm getting another error: Try to reduce the amount of packages being updated at

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On 01/29/2017 01:56 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months). [snip] I got stuck on "dev-ruby/racc" >>> Failed to emerge dev-ruby/racc-1.4.11, Log file: >>> '/var/log/portage/dev-ruby:racc-1.4.11:20170131-232501.log' >>> Jobs: 133 of

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 18:11:18 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > I got stuck on: dev-libs/boost-1.62.0-r1 > > i686-pc-linux-gnu-g++: error: unrecognized command line option > ‘-std=c++14’ ...failed updating 1 target... > * ERROR: dev-libs/boost-1.62.0-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase): > *

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

Thelma On 01/29/2017 01:56 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months). [snip] I got stuck on: dev-libs/boost-1.62.0-r1 i686-pc-linux-gnu-g++: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-std=c++14’ ...failed updating 1 target... *

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On 30/01/2017 22:32, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > On 01/29/2017 01:56 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months). >> I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into problems. >> > [snip] > > > OK, I have just few

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On 01/29/2017 01:56 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months). > I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into problems. > [snip] OK, I have just few blockers. What to do with them? I have grup-0.97-r16 installed

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 12:13:28 +, Stroller wrote: > One of my hacks is to compile a list of outdated packages in a text > file, then apply commands like `for package in $(cat list.txt) ; do > emerge -1 $package ; done`. It's dirty and kludgy, but if you have 100 > files to update and 80 of them

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

> On 29 Jan 2017, at 20:56, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months). > I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into problems. > > What is my best option, re-install from scratch, upgrade in stages etc. > With

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On Mon, 30 Jan 2017 10:22:14 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Also, I'd start with @system first, then work on @world. > > Only bad thing is, KDE, if you have it installed, is in @system > > because of dependencies, last I checked anyway. That will make > > @system a lot of fun itself. > > It

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On Sunday 29 Jan 2017 15:32:22 Dale wrote: > Might I also add, the -t option can reveal what is causing what > sometimes. It's never helped me though: whatever can't be installed breaks the tree building so I get no indentation. > Also, I'd start with @system first, then work on @world. > Only

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On Sunday, January 29, 2017 3:32:22 PM CET Dale wrote: > Might I also add, the -t option can reveal what is causing what > sometimes. Also, I'd start with @system first, then work on @world. > Only bad thing is, KDE, if you have it installed, is in @system because > of dependencies, last I

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On 01/29/2017 03:33 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 30/01/2017 00:25, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 03:32:22PM -0600, Dale wrote: >> > I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months). > I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > On 01/29/2017 03:25 PM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: >> On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 03:32:22PM -0600, Dale wrote: >> > I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months). > I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into >

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On 01/29/2017 03:25 PM, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 03:32:22PM -0600, Dale wrote: > I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months). I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into problems. What is my best

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On 01/29/2017 02:43 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 01/29/2017 03:56 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months). >> I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into problems. >> > > Ugh, you're in for it. The ncurses

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On 30/01/2017 00:25, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 03:32:22PM -0600, Dale wrote: > I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months). I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into problems. What is my best

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 03:32:22PM -0600, Dale wrote: > >> I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months). > >> I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into > >> problems. > >> > >> What is my best option, re-install from scratch, upgrade in stages etc. >

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 13:56:00 -0700, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months). > I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into > problems. The advice you've already been given is all good. I would add that you should

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On 01/29/2017 03:56 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months). > I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into problems. > Ugh, you're in for it. The ncurses update requires --backtrack=100 or something like that.

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 29/01/2017 22:56, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months). >> I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into problems. >> >> What is my best option, re-install from scratch, upgrade in stages

Re: [gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

On 29/01/2017 22:56, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months). > I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into problems. > > What is my best option, re-install from scratch, upgrade in stages etc. > With firefox-bin I'm

[gentoo-user] upgrading 1-year old system

I haven't updated my system for over a year (1year and 3-months). I was trying to upgrade my firefox-bin and I'm already running into problems. What is my best option, re-install from scratch, upgrade in stages etc. With firefox-bin I'm getting: emerge -p firefox-bin These are the packages that