2015-08-28 7:03 GMT+03:00 gevisz gev...@gmail.com:
2015-08-27 20:21 GMT+03:00 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk:
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:33:33 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Fix the real error, and all that junk on the screen goes away. No reason
to stop updating.
And the fix is to resync, it's
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 6:25 AM, Alec Ten Harmsel
a...@alectenharmsel.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:34:05PM +0300, gevisz wrote:
Yes, the full system update now proceeded without blocks, however
with severe warnings while compiling firefox. They are provided below.
But the issue with
On Thursday, August 27, 2015 07:13:58 PM Marc Joliet wrote:
Am Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:42:07 +0200
schrieb J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org:
I only had 1 required by set.
Which basically got me to remove the llvm use-flag from mesa.
That solved the block for me as it ended up removing llvm
On Fri, Aug 28, 2015 at 12:34:05PM +0300, gevisz wrote:
Yes, the full system update now proceeded without blocks, however
with severe warnings while compiling firefox. They are provided below.
But the issue with ncurces blocks seem to be resolved.
Thank you all who replied to this thread.
Am Fri, 28 Aug 2015 11:44:29 +0200
schrieb J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org:
On Thursday, August 27, 2015 07:13:58 PM Marc Joliet wrote:
Am Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:42:07 +0200
schrieb J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org:
I only had 1 required by set.
Which basically got me to remove the llvm
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:34 PM, gevisz gev...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not understand:
1) why portage wants to upgrade ncurses-5.9-r3 to ncurses-5.9-r101
(because it is marked),
2) why it can not,
3) what to do with this block.
$ eix ncurses
[I] sys-libs/ncurses
Available
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:33:33 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Fix the real error, and all that junk on the screen goes away. No reason
to stop updating.
And the fix is to resync, it's a fixed bug
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558856
--
Neil Bothwick
You want us to do WHAT? - Ancient
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 05:42:07PM +0200, J. Roeleveld wrote:
That solved the block for me as it ended up removing llvm
What is llvm actually used for?
--
Joost
Some of the graphics code in mesa is written in LLVM's IR and compiled
on the fly using all of the x86 extensions (SSE, AVX,
Am Thu, 27 Aug 2015 18:25:43 +0300
schrieb gevisz gev...@gmail.com:
The following keyword changes are necessary to proceed:
(see package.accept_keywords in the portage(5) man page for more
details)
# required by app-emulation/wine-1.6.2::gentoo
# required by @selected
# required by
Am Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:42:07 +0200
schrieb J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org:
I only had 1 required by set.
Which basically got me to remove the llvm use-flag from mesa.
That solved the block for me as it ended up removing llvm
[...]
FWIW, my experience yesterday was that you should be able
2015-08-27 17:43 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:34 PM, gevisz gev...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not understand:
1) why portage wants to upgrade ncurses-5.9-r3 to ncurses-5.9-r101
(because it is marked),
2) why it can not,
3) what to do with
On 27/08/2015 17:25, gevisz wrote:
2015-08-27 17:52 GMT+03:00 Marc Joliet mar...@gmx.de:
Am Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:34:24 +0300
schrieb gevisz gev...@gmail.com:
I do not understand:
1) why portage wants to upgrade ncurses-5.9-r3 to ncurses-5.9-r101
(because it is marked),
2) why it can
2015-08-27 18:18 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:16 PM, gevisz gev...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-08-27 17:43 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:34 PM, gevisz gev...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not
Am Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:34:24 +0300
schrieb gevisz gev...@gmail.com:
I do not understand:
1) why portage wants to upgrade ncurses-5.9-r3 to ncurses-5.9-r101
(because it is marked),
2) why it can not,
3) what to do with this block.
$ eix ncurses
[I] sys-libs/ncurses
Available
2015-08-27 17:52 GMT+03:00 Marc Joliet mar...@gmx.de:
Am Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:34:24 +0300
schrieb gevisz gev...@gmail.com:
I do not understand:
1) why portage wants to upgrade ncurses-5.9-r3 to ncurses-5.9-r101
(because it is marked),
2) why it can not,
3) what to do with this block.
On Thursday, August 27, 2015 05:33:33 PM Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 27/08/2015 17:25, gevisz wrote:
2015-08-27 17:52 GMT+03:00 Marc Joliet mar...@gmx.de:
P.S. I have too much required by lines. So, if the portage will not
resolve this issue automatically, I will stop to update my
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:43 PM, Alexander Kapshuk
alexander.kaps...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:34 PM, gevisz gev...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not understand:
1) why portage wants to upgrade ncurses-5.9-r3 to ncurses-5.9-r101
(because it is marked),
2) why it can not,
3) what
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 6:16 PM, gevisz gev...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-08-27 17:43 GMT+03:00 Alexander Kapshuk alexander.kaps...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 5:34 PM, gevisz gev...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not understand:
1) why portage wants to upgrade ncurses-5.9-r3 to ncurses-5.9-r101
2015-08-27 20:21 GMT+03:00 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk:
On Thu, 27 Aug 2015 17:33:33 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Fix the real error, and all that junk on the screen goes away. No reason
to stop updating.
And the fix is to resync, it's a fixed bug
19 matches
Mail list logo
