On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 16:48 +0100, Kristian Poul Herkild wrote:
Joseph wrote:
On Wed, 2005-11-30 at 16:01 +0100, Uwe Klosa wrote:
Did you import your settings from an older OO version? I had that issue
with the binary version upgrading from 1.x. So I did a clean
install with the
Ernie Schroder wrote:
Actually Neil, you're right, the 8 hours that it takes to build OO is not down
time, but try playing poker on-line while it's running. I can never remember
to do those long builds while I sleep so I end up, in this case, and for
firefox, going for the immediate
Use rsync. I am not sure how much gain there is to be had but try using
an older version as the seed file - should save at least a little.
Creative use of head/tail with seed files and already downloaded
portions can save a lot if the link drops out halfway.
Make sure you use the -P option (read
On Thursday 01 December 2005 03:17, W.Kenworthy wrote:
Use rsync. I am not sure how much gain there is to be had but try using
an older version as the seed file - should save at least a little.
Creative use of head/tail with seed files and already downloaded
portions can save a lot if the
Joseph wrote:
Is there a benefit of compiling Openoffice 2.0 vs. installing from
binary.
I've AMD 1.8Mhz with 1Gb or Ram and it has been compiling OO 2.0 for
7-hours already.
It's likely to take somewhere around 8-11 hours on such a machine. It
took somewhere around 10 hours for me on a
Make sure all nfs services are running on client and server.
OR
you have iptables running and you are blocking random nfs service ports.
Check both client and server.
run rpcinfo -p on each machine to see what ports need to be open. It might
be better to just allow anything to go between
Solved the problem.
Apparently you need to disable file locking by commenting out the
following lines:
# file locking now enabled by default
#SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING=1
#export SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING
in /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice
as simple as it gets.
yours,
kos
--
On 10/27/05, Konstantin V. Gavrilenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Solved the problem.Apparently you need to disable file locking by commenting out thefollowing lines:# file locking now enabled by default#SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING=1#export SAL_ENABLE_FILE_LOCKING
in /usr/lib/openoffice/program/soffice
I
tried it,
but it did not solve the issue on my box.
I guess, i'll stick to the commenting out the file_locking
yours,
kos
--
Respectfully,
Konstantin V. Gavrilenko
Arhont Ltd - Information Security
web:http://www.arhont.com
http://www.wi-foo.com
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel:
Konstantin V. Gavrilenko wrote:
Apparently you need to disable file locking by commenting out the
following lines:
either that or run lockd...
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Bruno Lustosa wrote:
It seems rpc.statd isn't running, because status monitor doesn't show on
the list.
ah.. that's right. lockd needs statd. silly nfs.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
As discussed in this thread
http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=54586
QTE
++
1 On certain Linux machines, file locking is known to fail due to the
NFS lock demon not running.
2 On certain other Linux machines, it appears that file locking fails
due to some other, not yet
On 10/25/05, Konstantin V. Gavrilenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have emerge OpenOffice 2.0 recently and noticed a strange problem,that whenever I try to access the file located on the nfs, the OO2hangs. The rest of the applications are working fine with nfs, and suchproblem never happened with
On Oct 26, 2005, at 2:08 PM, Bruno Lustosa wrote:On 10/25/05, Konstantin V. Gavrilenko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have emerge OpenOffice 2.0 recently and noticed a strange problem,that whenever I try to access the file located on the nfs, the OO2hangs. The rest of the applications are working fine
On 10/26/05, John Jolet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
in
my experience samba works better for that sort of thing anyway.
If a server serving an nfs share goes down, all the computers with that
share mounted will go nuts, spending 100% cpu trying to get the share
back. Samba seems to fail more
Hi,
On Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:24:07 -0600
Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been using OpenOffice 2.0 since the 1.9.xx beta era. For a while,
I've had issues with the responsiveness when I click a menu or use the
scroll bar with my mouse. Clicking a menu or scrolling with the mouse
causes
yes,i am wait a long time too
i have another problem too
when i double click one file,openoffice can't open it ,gave me some error message look like can't find file ***.xls
but the ***.xls was exist
thx2005/10/22, Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've been using OpenOffice 2.0 since the 1.9.xx beta
On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 09:37:45AM -0500, Paul Varner wrote:
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 05:58 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
051016 John J. Foster wrote:
I've been fighting the install of OOo rc3 for a few days now.
Everything is fine until running revdep-rebuild,
which wants to re-install the
051016 John J. Foster wrote:
I've been fighting the install of OOo rc3 for a few days now.
Everything is fine until running revdep-rebuild,
which wants to re-install the OOo I just installed.
I haven't done this with OO, but my experience is
that Revdep-rebuild always wants to remerge what I
John J. Foster schreef:
Good evening,
I've been fighting the install of OOo rc3 for a few days now.
Everything is fine until running revdep-rebuild, which wants to
re-install the OOo I just installed. I remember having trouble with
various binary packages before, including OOo, which I
On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 05:58 -0400, Philip Webb wrote:
051016 John J. Foster wrote:
I've been fighting the install of OOo rc3 for a few days now.
Everything is fine until running revdep-rebuild,
which wants to re-install the OOo I just installed.
I haven't done this with OO, but my
On 10/16/05, John J. Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip long-windedness and get to the point]Is anybody else seeing revdep-rebuild weirdness with the latest OOo's, rc2 and rc3?Yes,
I too have the same problems, mostly it would seem, with some embedded
python interpreter. I ignore it and things
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 07:49:28PM -0400, Michael Crute wrote:
On 10/16/05, John J. Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anybody else seeing revdep-rebuild weirdness with the latest OOo's,
rc2 and rc3?
Yes, I too have the same problems, mostly it would seem, with some
On 10/16/05, John J. Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 07:49:28PM -0400, Michael Crute wrote:On 10/16/05, John J. Foster [1]Gentoo-[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Is anybody else seeing revdep-rebuild weirdness with the latest OOo's,
rc2 and rc3?Yes, I too have the same problems,
On Sun, Oct 16, 2005 at 09:35:55PM -0400, Michael Crute wrote:
Well the only thing I can think is emerge -C openoffice-bin. But that has
other side-effects that you may like even less than a non-clean run of
revdep-rebuild :-)
Yeah - I guess that would teach that stinking
On Wednesday 22 June 2005 09:43 am, Patrick Marquetecken wrote:
Hi,
With the latest bin version I can't open of save documents that are on a
nfs volume, has anyone else the same problem?
No problem here with nfs mounts, but I cannot open some documents that were
saved as .odt files using
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 09:53 am, James wrote:
Hello All,
OpenOffice 2.0 looks significantly enhanced. Does anybody have
a guestimate or insight as to when it will be available, via
emerge?
Has anybody compiled OO 2.0 directly? If so what are your
results and is it stable?
There is an
James wrote:
Hello All,
OpenOffice 2.0 looks significantly enhanced. Does anybody have
a guestimate or insight as to when it will be available, via
emerge?
Has anybody compiled OO 2.0 directly? If so what are your
results and is it stable?
I never got it to compile, but I have been using
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 10:44 am, Richard Fish wrote:
James wrote:
Hello All,
OpenOffice 2.0 looks significantly enhanced. Does anybody have
a guestimate or insight as to when it will be available, via
emerge?
Has anybody compiled OO 2.0 directly? If so what are your
results and is it
On Wed, 11 May 2005 13:53:16 + (UTC), James wrote:
OpenOffice 2.0 looks significantly enhanced. Does anybody have
a guestimate or insight as to when it will be available, via
emerge?
There's already an ebuild for 1.9.95, a beta of 2.0, in portage, but it
is masked. If you want to try it,
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 13:53 +, James wrote:
Hello All,
OpenOffice 2.0 looks significantly enhanced. Does anybody have
a guestimate or insight as to when it will be available, via
emerge?
Has anybody compiled OO 2.0 directly? If so what are your
results and is it stable?
As someone
By the way, I merged openoffice-bin 1.9.93 . I don't see the beta
versions in the standard (non-bin) ebuild.
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 12 May 2005 03:42:01 -0400, Michael W. Holdeman wrote:
There is an ebuild for the beta somewhere, I'll look for it if you are
interested.
Try /usr/portage/app-office :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Psychiatrists say that 1 of 4 people are mentally ill.
pgpoFG3pJs8u3.pgp
Description: PGP
On Wed, 2005-05-11 at 16:45 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Thu, 12 May 2005 03:42:01 -0400, Michael W. Holdeman wrote:
There is an ebuild for the beta somewhere, I'll look for it if you are
interested.
Try /usr/portage/app-office :)
only for openoffice-bin, not openoffice
--
On Wed, May 11, 2005 8:53 pm, Nick Rout said:
Try /usr/portage/app-office :)
only for openoffice-bin, not openoffice
Who wants to spend 12 hours building beta software that will probably have
been updated before the merge has finished?
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wednesday 11 May 2005 04:04 pm, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2005 8:53 pm, Nick Rout said:
Try /usr/portage/app-office :)
only for openoffice-bin, not openoffice
Who wants to spend 12 hours building beta software that will probably have
been updated before the merge has
Michael W. Holdeman wrote:
And I built OpenOffice once, it ended up running slower than OpenOffice-bin...
How come?
I have noticed the same effect with Mozilla-software. At least I get the
feeling that the binaries are a little faster -- I can't really say for
sure.
Sigi
--
S. Schwartz wrote:
Michael W. Holdeman wrote:
And I built OpenOffice once, it ended up running slower than
OpenOffice-bin...
How come?
I have noticed the same effect with Mozilla-software. At least I get
the feeling that the binaries are a little faster -- I can't really
say for sure.
Hi,
I'm still trying to figure out why my install doesn't execute for normal
users. So OO only works for root. Upon the ooffice command a normal
user gets a message regarding setup or something like that, then it
aborts.
I believe its not supposed to be started as ooffice, but as one of
In OOo you do what the call a net install first which installs everything.
The each user runs another setup (in the OOo programs directory) which
then sets the user up - you do this for each user. The OOo install guide
has all this in it for various operating systems in more detail.
On Wed,
Am Mittwoch, 4. Mai 2005 21:25 schrieb Alexander Kern:
On Wednesday, 4. Mai 2005 20:30 Alexander Puchmayr wrote:
After emerging openoffice-1.1.4-r1, I can't open any .sxw, sxc, etc
file. Immediately, a window pops up saying An unrecoverable error
has occured
Do you mean that its
Luis Felipe Strano Moraes wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2005 at 08:01:38AM -0400, Kurt Guenther wrote:
Just checking if I'm missing something. I resumed a merge that ran
over night and it appears to start from the beginning again. As this
merge won't complete in the 10 hrs I give it, is there some
On 4/19/05, Mrugesh Karnik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, I don't remember who it was, but just last week, someone mentioned
using the feature keeptmp (the name could be wrong. I don't remember
properly and strangly I've somehow not archived the mail :S ) in
make.conf. That makes portage keep
201 - 243 of 243 matches
Mail list logo
