On Friday 17 June 2005 23:25, Zac Medico wrote:
Tony Davison wrote:
I just thought I would let you know what I've done to resolve
this problem. I have emerged gentoolkit-0.2.1_pre3 and made an
entry in my make.conf of SEARCH_DIRS_MASK=/opt.
I then ran revdep-rebuild and all ran without any
On Thursday 16 Jun 2005 19:45, Zac Medico wrote:
snip
revdep-rebuild is irrelevant to ooo-bin, and others, because you cannot
rebuild a binary package. All it does is reinstall the same binary, not
build a new one.
I just thought I would let you know what I've done to resolve this problem.
I
On Friday 17 June 2005 10:58, Paul wrote:
On Thursday 16 Jun 2005 19:45, Zac Medico wrote:
snip
revdep-rebuild is irrelevant to ooo-bin, and others, because you
cannot rebuild a binary package. All it does is reinstall the
same binary, not build a new one.
I just thought I would let
Tony Davison wrote:
On Friday 17 June 2005 10:58, Paul wrote:
On Thursday 16 Jun 2005 19:45, Zac Medico wrote:
snip
revdep-rebuild is irrelevant to ooo-bin, and others, because you
cannot rebuild a binary package. All it does is reinstall the
same binary, not build a new one.
I just thought I
On Friday 17 June 2005 20:25, Zac Medico wrote:
Tony Davison wrote:
On Friday 17 June 2005 10:58, Paul wrote:
On Thursday 16 Jun 2005 19:45, Zac Medico wrote:
snip
revdep-rebuild is irrelevant to ooo-bin, and others, because you
cannot rebuild a binary package. All it does is reinstall
Tony Davison wrote:
I just thought I would let you know what I've done to resolve this
problem. I have emerged gentoolkit-0.2.1_pre3 and made an entry in
my make.conf of SEARCH_DIRS_MASK=/opt.
I then ran revdep-rebuild and all ran without any open office
errors.
I may be misreading this thread
Mark Knecht wrote:
On 6/16/05, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 22:34:51 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
Please correct me if I'm wrong but if what revdep-rebuild does is
important then I want to kow about any program on my system that
doesn't have all it's dependencies
Zac Medico wrote:
Mark Knecht wrote:
On 6/16/05, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2005 22:34:51 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
Please correct me if I'm wrong but if what revdep-rebuild does is
important then I want to kow about any program on my system that
doesn't have all
Liar! Well, we forgive you, I think =).
Actually the better (Gentoo suggested) way to squelch these packages
is to exclude /opt from the search path in the revdep-rebuild script.
Just do EDITOR `which revdep-rebuild` and take /opt out of the
SEARCH_DIRS, most anything that goes in there should
Hi,
Maybe a better way is to emerge hard-masked gentoolkit-0.2.1_pre3
(cause it's only tested on x86).
In it there is a new version on 'revdep-rebuild' which allows you to
mask certain dirs, by using (mine):
...
SEARCH_DIRS_MASK=/home /mnt /opt/sun-jdk /opt/vmware/lib /opt/OpenOffice
...
For more
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:55:09 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
It would be nice, I would think, to have some info somewhere on how
the binary package was built - what flags, what gcc, etc., if only for
reference.
Binary packages are not compiled by Gentoo, so that information may not
be easy to come
On 6/16/05, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:55:09 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
It would be nice, I would think, to have some info somewhere on how
the binary package was built - what flags, what gcc, etc., if only for
reference.
Binary packages are not
On Thu, June 16, 2005 10:20 pm, Mark Knecht said:
Binary packages are not compiled by Gentoo, so that information may not
be easy to come by.
Oh!! I had no idea that was the case. I always assumed that this was
done by you guys for a few specific packages. If they come from
elsewhere then
On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 22:24 +0300, Rumen Yotov wrote:
Hi,
Maybe a better way is to emerge hard-masked gentoolkit-0.2.1_pre3
(cause it's only tested on x86).
In it there is a new version on 'revdep-rebuild' which allows you to
mask certain dirs, by using (mine):
...
SEARCH_DIRS_MASK=/home
14 matches
Mail list logo