On Thursday 16 Jun 2016 06:11:10 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On June 16, 2016 7:43:10 AM GMT+02:00, "J. Roeleveld"
wrote:
> >On Thursday, April 07, 2016 07:41:35 PM Remy Blank wrote:
> >> pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk wrote on 2016-04-07 17:24:
> >> > I have a new box with an NVMe SSD
On Thursday, June 16, 2016 09:28:53 AM Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Thursday 16 Jun 2016 06:11:10 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >
> > Ignore this.
> > Got it working, had to enable UEFI first for the NVME device in bios
>
> Glad to hear it. You had me scratching my head there, trying to remember
>
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> I don't see the part where all these latest fancy container thingymagicies
> are not really just "embed everything in everything"
>
> We've known for years the dangers of embedding stuff in packages (it hardly
>
On 16/06/2016 21:11, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 15:27:29 + (UTC) James wrote:
José Maldonado gmail.com> writes:
The last days, ArsTechnica publish this new:
El 16/06/16 a las 16:33, Rich Freeman escribió:
> FWIW - the subject of this thread suggests that this is some kind of
> "official" Gentoo thing. As far as I can tell somebody took it upon
> themselves to make this available for Gentoo, but it is not in any way
> endorsed by the distro. Of
El 16/06/16 a las 12:36, Mick escribió:
>
> Keylogger in a snap anyone?
>
It is possible, who knows. Especially when the server-side is proprietary .
--
Dios en su cielo, todo bien en la Tierra
El 16/06/16 a las 13:32, Tom H escribió:
>
> When I first saw this, I thought "strange, maybe if Gentoo develops an
> 'esnap' in order to build the container-package locally" but then I
> remembered that we have docker and lxc/lxd, so why not another method?
>
That is possible, but the goal
El 16/06/16 a las 11:27, James escribió:
> One word SECURITY? Trust but verify does come to mind.
>
The snaps come to "replace" a lack of security that is in Linux, in
addition to facilitating the installation of all applications from the
user-space without root privileges.
>
> Is their a
On 17/06/2016 02:02, José Maldonado wrote:
El 16/06/16 a las 16:33, Rich Freeman escribió:
FWIW - the subject of this thread suggests that this is some kind of
"official" Gentoo thing. As far as I can tell somebody took it upon
themselves to make this available for Gentoo, but it is not in any
On Thursday 16 Jun 2016 12:31:42 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thursday, June 16, 2016 09:28:53 AM Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Thursday 16 Jun 2016 06:11:10 J. Roeleveld wrote:
> > > Ignore this.
> > > Got it working, had to enable UEFI first for the NVME device in
> > > bios
> >
> > Glad to hear
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:53 PM, José Maldonado wrote:
>
> The last days, ArsTechnica publish this new:
>
> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/06/goodbye-apt-and-yum-ubuntus-snap-apps-are-coming-to-distros-everywhere/
>
> "Snaps now work natively on Arch,
José Maldonado gmail.com> writes:
> The last days, ArsTechnica publish this new:
>
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/06/goodbye-apt-and-yum-ubuntus-snap-apps-are-coming-to-distros-everywhere/
>
> "Snaps now work natively on Arch, Debian, Fedora, Kubuntu, Lubuntu,
> Ubuntu
Hi,
i have a layman git profile to store my stuff.
Is possible to force layman -S to sync a specific branch ?
Ok ,
/var/lib/portage/config keeps the hashes of the original modified files.
Thanks
Marco
On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 17:14:01 +0100
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jun 2016 18:07:21 +0200, ma...@nucleus.it wrote:
>
> > then i change parameters in /etc/dhcp/dhcpd.conf
> > and
On Thursday 16 Jun 2016 15:27:29 James wrote:
> José Maldonado gmail.com> writes:
> > The last days, ArsTechnica publish this new:
> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/06/goodbye-apt-and-yum-ub
> untus-snap-apps-are-coming-to-distros-everywhere/
> > "Snaps now work natively on
James wrote:
> José Maldonado gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>> The last days, ArsTechnica publish this new:
> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/06/goodbye-apt-and-yum-ubuntus-snap-apps-are-coming-to-distros-everywhere/
>> "Snaps now work natively on Arch, Debian, Fedora, Kubuntu,
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:52:26 +0200
ma...@nucleus.it wrote:
> Hi,
> i have a layman git profile to store my stuff.
>
> Is possible to force layman -S to sync a specific branch ?
This is speculation (and a bit of looking at Portage code), since I
haven't tried this. Ignoring Layman, repos.conf
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 11:46:12 -0700
Bryan Gardiner wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 17:52:26 +0200
> ma...@nucleus.it wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > i have a layman git profile to store my stuff.
> >
> > Is possible to force layman -S to sync a specific branch ?
>
> This is speculation
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 15:27:29 + (UTC) James wrote:
> José Maldonado gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> > The last days, ArsTechnica publish this new:
>
> >
> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/06/goodbye-apt-and-yum-ubuntus-snap-apps-are-coming-to-distros-everywhere/
> >
> > "Snaps
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 04:33:12PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
> >
> > I don't see the part where all these latest fancy container thingymagicies
> > are not really just "embed everything in everything"
> >
> >
El jue, 16-06-2016 a las 19:40 -0400, José Maldonado escribió:
> That is possible, but the goal is to serve Snap container for
> applications that can be downloaded and used by the user, down a
> single
> binary that will have all the dependencies in that binary. Docker and
> LXC obviously can do
On June 16, 2016 7:43:10 AM GMT+02:00, "J. Roeleveld"
wrote:
>On Thursday, April 07, 2016 07:41:35 PM Remy Blank wrote:
>> pe...@prh.myzen.co.uk wrote on 2016-04-07 17:24:
>> > I have a new box with an NVMe SSD drive attached to the PCI bus via
>an M.2
>> > interface. The
22 matches
Mail list logo