Re: [gentoo-user] ipw3945 and 128 bit WEP encryption

2006-11-12 Thread Mick
On Sunday 12 November 2006 01:33, Ryan Tandy wrote:
 Peter Kelly wrote:
  I emerge'd  ipw3945, but can't get it to work.

 is ipw3945d running?

 /etc/init.d/ipw3945d start

Also, make sure that you have pressed the WiFi button to switch on the 
hardware on that laptop, or have switched it on in the BIOS (not familiar 
with the model).
-- 
Regards,
Mick


pgptrk55LRLNH.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] What's the use of mozilla-launcher?

2006-11-12 Thread Alexander Skwar
Hello!

A while back, I discovered that mozilla-launcher is causing problems,
when the URL contains a , (comma); eg. 
http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,447923,00.html

In Knode/KDE, I configured, that firefox is to be used as the browser,
so that when I click on a URL, it's loaded in firefox. I did this by
modifying .kde/share/config/kdeglobals and adding/changing:

[General]
BrowserApplication=!/usr/bin/firefox

That can also somehow be done with kcontrol.

This works well - when I click on a URL, /usr/bin/firefox is run
with one parameter, which is the URL. But if the URL contains
a comma (like the example URL further up), that site isn't correctly
loaded. Instead of http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,447923,00.html
it would load http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,447923. Reason is, that 
firefox executes mozilla-launcher which will eventually run 
mozilla-xremote-client openURL($u). The problem with that is,
that openURL accepts two parameters and they are seperated with
a ,. So it sees two parameters: http://www.spiegel.de/wirtschaft/0,1518,447923 
and
00.html - 00.html is not a valid parameter, though. It should be
something like new-window.

When I use the original Firefox from mozilla.com, there's no such
problem. That is so, because the original firefox script doesn't
use openURL anymore.

I now changed the /usr/bin/firefox script so, that it doesn't
use mozilla-launcher anymore. Up to now, I can't find any problems.

What problems did I overlook? And what's actually the use of
mozilla-launcher with current firefoxes?

What would break, if mozilla-launcher is no longer used?

Cf. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150404

Or should I take this thread and purpose (ie. dump mozilla-launcher
for at least firefox) to the dev list?

Thanks,

Alexander Skwar
-- 
enhance, v.:
To tamper with an image, usually to its detriment.


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Anybody got OS/2 working under linux?

2006-11-12 Thread Petric Frank
Hello,

On Sunday 12 November 2006 07:03, Walter Dnes wrote:
 On Sat, Nov 11, 2006 at 09:00:09AM +0100, Petric Frank wrote

  I made a test install on a VMware Server installation (Host: AMD64 +
  Gentoo 2006.1). I created a VM (OS type other). Then i exit the console,
  changed in the *.vmx file the key guestOS to guestOS=os2experimental
  and start the installation of OS/2 Warp 4 (german) from CD. Somewhere in
  between i got two SYS... messages. After a reboot the install completes
  and seems to be ok now.

   Before I go ahead, a few more questions...

   1) I have to allow a couple of ~x86 packages in package.keywords
 first (yes, I did an emerge --sync).  Is this expected?
 =app-emulation/vmware-server-1.0.1.29996-r4 ~x86
 =app-emulation/vmware-modules-1.0.0.15-r1 ~x86

Same to me (except the version numbers, it's running - so why upgrading). I 
have the package vmware-server-console also installed. This is needed to get 
the mnagement tool (i.e. the window like vmware workstation).

   2) I notice that sys-libs/pam is loaded as a dependancy.  I don't mind
 the file sitting there, being used by vmware.  Does it just affect
 vmware?  If pam kicks in for other programs, it's a showstopper for me.

VMware server is a two-part application. A user interface (vmware server 
console) and the daemon (vmware server). They are communicating via the 
network. As i see it there must be an user authentication and this is done 
via pam.
As feature you get now the ability to run the console on an other machine 
(which don't need much resources). This may be a Win or Linux PC.

 [m3000][root][~] emerge --ask vmware-server

 These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

 Calculating dependencies... done!
 [ebuild  N] app-emulation/vmware-modules-1.0.0.15-r1
 [ebuild  N] sys-apps/xinetd-2.3.14  USE=-perl -tcpd
 [ebuild  N] sys-libs/pam-0.78-r3  USE=-berkdb -nis -pam_chroot
 -pam_console -pam_timestamp -pwdb (-selinux)
 [ebuild  N] app-emulation/vmware-server-1.0.1.29996-r4

 Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] no

xinetd needed for the network communication, pam for the authentication.

If you want to get the frontend (User I/O) you need to install 
vmware-server-console also.

   3) My current OS/2 machine is an old PII with a 3.2 gig harddrive.
 Can I short-circuit the install by copying the working OS/2 system to
 an empty VM?  Think of it as a stage 3 install for OS/2 g.

Maybe, but you have to take care at least on the display driver. Here actually 
i have standard VGA 640x480 - if you get a better resolution let be know how.

regards
Petric
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Re: Basic Vmware setup

2006-11-12 Thread reader
Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 server: Can create or edit existing configurations.  Can leave a
 virtual machine running in the background if you close the console

Is there a catch somewhere with `server'.  Buy the description it
appears to do everthing the `workstation' does, yet is free (beer).

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] ipw3945 and 128 bit WEP encryption

2006-11-12 Thread Peter Kelly
On Sunday 12 November 2006 02:00, Mick wrote:
 On Sunday 12 November 2006 01:33, Ryan Tandy wrote:
  Peter Kelly wrote:
   I emerge'd  ipw3945, but can't get it to work.
 
  is ipw3945d running?
 
  /etc/init.d/ipw3945d start

 Also, make sure that you have pressed the WiFi button to switch on the
 hardware on that laptop, or have switched it on in the BIOS (not familiar
 with the model).
Yes, the daemon is running.  It starts when you modprobe ipw3945.
There isn't a wifi switch that I've found.  There is an LED that blinks 
slowly.  The card appears to be on.  I just can't get it configured.

Thanks.

Peter
-- 
Linus Torvalds:
 This is the special easter release of linux, more mundanely called 1.3.84
Winfried Truemper:
 Umh, oh. What do you mean by special easter release?. Will it quit
 working today and rise on easter?
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Re: [OT] VMware legal question

2006-11-12 Thread reader
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 That might be legal, but why don't you go the absolutely legal
 way and use vmware-server instead of vmware-workstation?


Sorry about butting in here:
I hope I'm not just blind but:

Alexander, I didn't see a word of documentation in the server package
about how to create a virtual machine.  The README says to use `product
documentaion' but offers no clue of how to start `product',

There seems an absolute dirth of information for anything other than
general settings one can make for a herd of vms.

In fact it isn't at all clear that one can build a virtual machine
with the server package.

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Re: SCSI/libata based PATA support

2006-11-12 Thread Sven Köhler
 do you know, what's going on at present in kernel development? We had
 libata based SATA drivers for a few kernel-versions now.
 Since 2.6.19, we seem to be offered libata based PATA drivers too!

 Why are they doing it? Does this make any sense to you? The new drivers
 don't replace the old ones, at present time. But are they planned to? Or
 do they just exist for the fun of it ?
 
 yes, they will replace the old drivers at some point in the future.
 
 And they don't exist just for the fun of it. ide is in a horrible state for 
 many, many years. And every attempt to 'fix' it, went very wrong. libpata is 
 the latest attempt to clean up the mess. What do we get? Hopefully better 
 drivers, better error handling, better powermanagment support.

I see! very nice ...

But with the new drivers, you can't enable/disable DMA (yet) etc.
Well, but they work nice, as far as i can tell.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[gentoo-user] Symlinking out of a chroot

2006-11-12 Thread Brian Davis

Hey folks,

I will be running my apache2 server in a chroot. Most of my data for the 
server (e.g. pictures, user webpages) are on another partition from my 
chroot.  I don't want to move all that data into the apache chroot if I 
don't have to.  Therefore I would have soft symlinks from the chroot to 
the data.  Does this effectively make the chroot worthless?


Thanks!
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [OT] VMware legal question

2006-11-12 Thread Daniel Iliev
Alexander Skwar wrote:
 · Daniel Iliev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

   
 Is it legal to do the following:

 1) emerge vmware-workstation
 2) build some images (within the 30 day trial period)
 3) emerge -C vmware-workstation (within the 30 day trial period)
 4) emerge vmware-player and use it to play the images created by
 vmware-workstation
 

 That might be legal, but why don't you go the absolutely legal
 way and use vmware-server instead of vmware-workstation?

 Alexander Skwar
   

I have no strong reason for choosing vmw-workstation. There are two
minor things that make me prefer it:

- I am familiar with vmw-workstation and I've never seen vmw-server
- VMW-Server is beta version and masked as testing package


If there were any legal issues with vmw-workstation I would use
vmw-server or try the site pointed by Mr. Raymond Lewis Rebbeck:
http://www.easyvmx.com/


-- 
Best regards,
Daniel


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Symlinking out of a chroot

2006-11-12 Thread Daniel Iliev
Brian Davis wrote:
 Hey folks,

 I will be running my apache2 server in a chroot. Most of my data for
 the server (e.g. pictures, user webpages) are on another partition
 from my chroot.  I don't want to move all that data into the apache
 chroot if I don't have to.  Therefore I would have soft symlinks from
 the chroot to the data.  Does this effectively make the chroot worthless?

 Thanks!


I'm not sure if it would work at all. If I were you I would make dirs
instead of symlinks and use mount --bind.

HTH

-- 
Best regards,
Daniel


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Symlinking out of a chroot

2006-11-12 Thread Shawn Haggett
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Brian Davis wrote:
 Hey folks,
 
 I will be running my apache2 server in a chroot. Most of my data for the
 server (e.g. pictures, user webpages) are on another partition from my
 chroot.  I don't want to move all that data into the apache chroot if I
 don't have to.  Therefore I would have soft symlinks from the chroot to
 the data.  Does this effectively make the chroot worthless?
 
 Thanks!

At a quick guess, I suspect the symlink will end up pointing to
something like, /link will be a symlink pointing to '../../blah', which
won't be valid inside the chroot. Or will point to '/var/www/mydata'
which again, won't be valid inside the chroot. However I don't have a
chroot environment here with which to test this. But basically the
symlink will be broken inside the choort.

Shawn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFVz/hQv6DFiTKHhkRAoDTAJwPq1dUX3+Lc6FkTXhXKdUaMnMYLgCfcJFN
yfy4N1cwW9QVvmOdtYyKmNE=
=ke/5
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Symlinking out of a chroot

2006-11-12 Thread Boyd Stephen Smith Jr.
On Sunday 12 November 2006 08:56, Brian Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 
about '[gentoo-user] Symlinking out of a chroot':
 I will be running my apache2 server in a chroot. Most of my data for the
 server (e.g. pictures, user webpages) are on another partition from my
 chroot.  I don't want to move all that data into the apache chroot if I
 don't have to.  Therefore I would have soft symlinks from the chroot to
 the data.

You can't symlink out of a chroot.  You can symlink into one.  You can 
hardlink in both directions.

Of course, in your case, I'd say your best option is probably mounting with 
the bind option with symlinks within the chroot as needed.

-- 
If there's one thing we've established over the years,
it's that the vast majority of our users don't have the slightest
clue what's best for them in terms of package stability.
-- Gentoo Developer Ciaran McCreesh


pgpZzv2KkzjKf.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Basic Vmware setup

2006-11-12 Thread Brett I. Holcomb
Workstation allows you to create snapshots of a setup and then create clones 
from it so you can make a base system, then do branches off of it as you add 
to it.  For example, you can create a base Gentoo install and snapshot it. 
Then you can clone it and install some software - say to make a  DAW.  You 
can snapshot that and continue adding software to it or clone it.  The 
workstations use differential methods to create the clones so storage space 
isn't as great as storing an the vm and it's files.

Server you can't do snapshots so you create a VM, save it, copy it, then 
modify it.  However, server does allow you to start the VMs as a service and 
keep them running when you are  not logged in - with workstation you have to 
start them after you login.

In short they each do different things and what you use depends on the 
situation.  At work I use workstation so I can do snapshots since I am 
testing setups and I want to have a base to go back to and start over from.  
However, I have to start the service each time I login in so others can get 
to the VMs.   For someone who doesn't need snapshotting you can just copy VMs 
and add to them as long as you have th file space.


On Sunday November 12 2006 07:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  server: Can create or edit existing configurations.  Can leave a
  virtual machine running in the background if you close the console

 Is there a catch somewhere with `server'.  Buy the description it
 appears to do everthing the `workstation' does, yet is free (beer).

-- 

Brett I. Holcomb
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Symlinking out of a chroot

2006-11-12 Thread Hans-Werner Hilse
Hi,

On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 09:56:31 -0500
Brian Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I will be running my apache2 server in a chroot. Most of my data for the 
 server (e.g. pictures, user webpages) are on another partition from my 
 chroot.  I don't want to move all that data into the apache chroot if I 
 don't have to.  Therefore I would have soft symlinks from the chroot to 
 the data.  Does this effectively make the chroot worthless?

No, the links just wouldn't work. But you can 
mount --bind /source /chroot/target them.

-hwh
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



RE: [gentoo-user] My Snort server -- I Don't know whats wrong -- It seems to go to sleep

2006-11-12 Thread Timothy A. Holmes


 

 -Original Message-
 From: Hans-Werner Hilse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 Sent: Saturday, November 11, 2006 11:27 AM
 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] My Snort server -- I Don't know 
 whats wrong -- It seems to go to sleep
 
 Hi,
 
 On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 17:32:10 -0500
 Timothy A. Holmes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  The short summary is the box
  keeps going to sleep on me.  It wont respond to ssh or webpage 
  requests till I ping it about 10 times after that it works normally.
 
 First: I assume you've checked all cables and tried to 
 exchange them against some that are known working? Maybe even 
 tried another port on the switch for the administrative interface?
 
 Then it sounds like an ARP problem to me. I'd start with 
 running tcpdump on the administrative interface in order to 
 see what that machine's seeing, and when. My blind guess 
 would be that something irritates the routing, hence my guess 
 that ARP's a bit broken. The routing table entry would time 
 out and the machine you're using to connect to the admin 
 interface needs some time to get a proper ARP answer. Is that 
 snort machine's kernel somehow patched w/ regard to 
 ARP/Routing? Did you configure ARP via sysctl to non-default values?
 You can check that suggestion by setting a routing table 
 entry for the target machine manually on your SSH client 
 machine (arp -s).
 
 -hwh
 --
 gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
 
 

Hans:

Thanks for the suggestions,
It turned out that the problem was that the processor was entering a low
power state after a period of time and needed to be woken up again --
adding no-hld to the kernel line in grub.conf solved the problem
completely

Thanks again

TIM

Timothy A. Holmes
IT Manager / Network Admin / Web Master / Computer Teacher
 
Medina Christian Academy
A Higher Standard...
 
Jeremiah 33:3
Jeremiah 29:11
Esther 4:14


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OpenOffice help files

2006-11-12 Thread Bertram Scharpf
Hi Chris,

Am Freitag, 03. Nov 2006, 23:15:16 -0500 schrieb Chris Atkinson:
 On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 20:44:13 +0100
 Bertram Scharpf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  in OpenOffice, when hitting F1, I only get a dialog saying:
  The help file for this topic is not installed.
 
 Is it possible you don't have the java USE flag enabled? The openoffice
 ebuild contains the following warning:
 
 You are building with java-support disabled, [...]

I did something like emerge openoffice  halt and left
the computer alone for a night. So I couldn't see that
output. Sorry.

Now it works. Thanks.

Bertram


-- 
Bertram Scharpf
Stuttgart, Deutschland/Germany
http://www.bertram-scharpf.de
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] OpenOffice help files

2006-11-12 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 12 Nov 2006 18:15:46 +0100, Bertram Scharpf wrote:

 I did something like emerge openoffice  halt and left
 the computer alone for a night. So I couldn't see that
 output.

genlop -i openoffice will show you the USE flags used to emerge it.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Few women admit their age. Few men act theirs.


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[gentoo-user] vmware-player installation

2006-11-12 Thread Michael George
I am trying to install vmware-player, but things don't seem to be
working right.

Aftere doing the emerge, and starting /etc/init.d/vmware, I was told
that cupsd had to be started after vmware but that some of the vmware
dependencies required cupsd.  Since I don't need to pring from the VM, I
blew that off.

I ran vmware-config.pl and set up the bridged networking.  But after
answering the questions, I get:

 * Starting VMware services: [ ok ]
 *   Virtual machine monitor [ ok ]
 *   Virtual ethernet[ !! ]
 *   Bridged networking on /dev/vmnet0   [ !! ]

(on my first attempt I configured the bridged and NAT networking, but
I've re-run vmware-config.pl since then).

When I ran vmplayer, I was told that it wasn't configured as
/etc/vmware/not_configured was still in place.  Just to see what would
happen, I removed it and fired it up.

There was a complaint about vmmon not being loaded, and it appeared that
the install built vmmon.ko for kernel 2.6.15, rather than for 2.6.17, so
I rebuilt it and installed the module.

I re-ran vmplayer and I get errors that networking is not properly
configured.  Given the !! above, I'm not surprised.

I think I'll need to go back to the beginning, but I'm not sure what to
do differently that I might succeed.

Anyone have any advice?

-- 
-M

There are 10 kinds of people in this world:
Those who can count in binary and those who cannot.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Wierd ALSA sound problem

2006-11-12 Thread jeff
I'm having trouble getting ALSA working reliably.
The card is an nvidia MCP51 HD sound card, using the driver
snd-hda-intel.  I have sound support built into the kernel.

When I initially configure it, using alsaconf, everything works fine.
As soon as I attempt to change the mixer settings, sound goes silent,
and the only way to correct it is to shut down the application using the
sound card, then re-run alsaconf.

Has anyone else experienced similar issues?

Thanks

Jeff


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] What's the use of mozilla-launcher?

2006-11-12 Thread Richard Fish

On 11/12/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

In Knode/KDE, I configured, that firefox is to be used as the browser,
so that when I click on a URL, it's loaded in firefox. I did this by
modifying .kde/share/config/kdeglobals and adding/changing:

[General]
BrowserApplication=!/usr/bin/firefox


You could also set this to /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/firefox to bypass
mozilla-launcher.


I now changed the /usr/bin/firefox script so, that it doesn't
use mozilla-launcher anymore. Up to now, I can't find any problems.

What problems did I overlook? And what's actually the use of
mozilla-launcher with current firefoxes?

What would break, if mozilla-launcher is no longer used?


Nothing that I can tell

It looks to me like the main purpose of Gentoo's mozilla-launcher was
to transparently support both firefox and firefox-bin (or mozilla and
mozilla-bin, or thunderbid and thunderbird-bin, etc), and to make sure
that new urls re-used an existing instance.  Current firefox versions
seem to support this internally, and you end up with firefox or
firefox-bin installed in /usr/bin depending upon which one you
install.  I don't see any reason why /usr/bin/firefox can't exec
/usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/firefox and /usr/bin/firefox-bin can't exec
/opt/firefox/firefox.


Cf. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150404


As you have probably already seen, I added a small patch to the bug,
just in case the Gentoo devs want to keep it around.


Or should I take this thread and purpose (ie. dump mozilla-launcher
for at least firefox) to the dev list?


Yeah, -dev would be the appropriate place to bring up dumping mozilla-launcher.

-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Remove prelink and purge prelinked exec

2006-11-12 Thread Marco Calviani

Hi list,
  i would like to remove prelink and put the system to the state it
has before the prelink procedure. I've read that a

# prelink -ua

can do the job but i would have some suggestions from you all. It is
enough to behave like this?

Regards,
mc
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] ipw3945 and 128 bit WEP encryption

2006-11-12 Thread Richard Fish

On 11/12/06, Peter Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Yes, the daemon is running.  It starts when you modprobe ipw3945.
There isn't a wifi switch that I've found.  There is an LED that blinks
slowly.  The card appears to be on.  I just can't get it configured.


Well I can attest that the wep will work with this card...I have it working.

What versions of net-wireless/ipw3945, net-wireless/ipw3945-ucode,
net-wireless/ipw3945d, and net-wireless/ieee80211 do you have
installed?  In other words, what is the output of:

emerge -pv net-wireless/ipw3945 net-wireless/ipw3945-ucode \
   net-wireless/ipw3945d net-wireless/ieee80211

And I suppose the outputs of iwconfig -v and iwconfig could help too.

-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] vmware-player installation

2006-11-12 Thread Michael George
I figured it out...  along with the vmmon module being built for the
wrong kernel was the vmnet module.  Once I built it for the right
kernel, put it into place and ran /etc/init.d/vmware start, it runs
without error.

Sorry for the intrusion. :)

On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 02:21:08PM -0500, Michael George wrote:
 I am trying to install vmware-player, but things don't seem to be
 working right.
 
 Aftere doing the emerge, and starting /etc/init.d/vmware, I was told
 that cupsd had to be started after vmware but that some of the vmware
 dependencies required cupsd.  Since I don't need to pring from the VM, I
 blew that off.
 
 I ran vmware-config.pl and set up the bridged networking.  But after
 answering the questions, I get:
 
  * Starting VMware services: [ ok ]
  *   Virtual machine monitor [ ok ]
  *   Virtual ethernet[ !! ]
  *   Bridged networking on /dev/vmnet0   [ !! ]
 
 (on my first attempt I configured the bridged and NAT networking, but
 I've re-run vmware-config.pl since then).
 
 When I ran vmplayer, I was told that it wasn't configured as
 /etc/vmware/not_configured was still in place.  Just to see what would
 happen, I removed it and fired it up.
 
 There was a complaint about vmmon not being loaded, and it appeared that
 the install built vmmon.ko for kernel 2.6.15, rather than for 2.6.17, so
 I rebuilt it and installed the module.
 
 I re-ran vmplayer and I get errors that networking is not properly
 configured.  Given the !! above, I'm not surprised.
 
 I think I'll need to go back to the beginning, but I'm not sure what to
 do differently that I might succeed.

-- 
-M

There are 10 kinds of people in this world:
Those who can count in binary and those who cannot.
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] mounttool

2006-11-12 Thread Richard Fish

On 11/11/06, Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi folks,

some distros come with a little utility called mounttool. I can loop mount
images of encrypted filesystems (cryptsetup but for loop mounting). I can't
seem to find it in gentoo. Does it hide somewhere? Or can someone recommend a
similar tool in portage?


What's wrong with:

losetup /dev/loop/0 image
cryptsetup create decrypted_image /dev/loop/0
mount /dev/mapper/decrypted_image /mnt/encrypted

-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Remove prelink and purge prelinked exec

2006-11-12 Thread Jesús Guerrero
El Domingo, 12 de Noviembre de 2006 20:58, Marco Calviani escribió:
 Hi list,
i would like to remove prelink and put the system to the state it
 has before the prelink procedure. I've read that a

 # prelink -ua

 can do the job but i would have some suggestions from you all. It is
 enough to behave like this?

 Regards,
 mc

I never trusted prelink. So, I dont trust it to un-prelink either. 

The best way to make sure your binaries are not altered by 3rd party tools is 
this:

emerge -euD world

Regards, Jesús.

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] bzflag runs then crashes

2006-11-12 Thread James
Hello,

I have bzflag running quite nicely on a portable
(intel 3GHz p4) with gentoo.
I'm trying to get bzflag  [Installed: 2.0.8]
running an [AMD Athlon(TM) XP 2400+) with 
1.5 M or ram. Both the 2.0.8 and the 2.0.4
versions crash with the same symptoms, so
it seems like the problem is not with bzflag,
but in how glx/aiglx/dri/x/kde/whatever is set up.

Video card is:[GeForce2 MX/MX 400] 

It runs but crashes after about 10 seconds.
Is there a log I should look at for any detailed
information as to why it crashes? When It crashes
it kills off the entire kde login session, and
put the kdm login-in screen back up on the system.
The OS does not reboot the machine, just kde.

It could be the nvidia driver and aiglx or the 
underlying kernel (2.6.17-gentoo-r8) being messed up.

The only error message I get in /var/log/messages is:
Nov 12 20:55:48 crystal kde(pam_unix)[7491]: session 
opened for user james by (uid=0)
Nov 12 20:59:16 crystal kdm[6629]: X server for display 
:0 terminated unexpectedly
Nov 12 20:59:16 crystal kde(pam_unix)[7491]: session closed 
for user james
Nov 12 20:59:16 crystal agpgart: Found an AGP 3.5 compliant 
device at :00:00.0.
Nov 12 20:59:17 crystal agpgart: Device is in legacy mode, 
falling back to 2.x
Nov 12 20:59:17 crystal agpgart: Putting AGP V2 device at 
:00:00.0 into 2x mode
Nov 12 20:59:17 crystal agpgart: Putting AGP V2 device at 
:01:00.0 into 2x mode



Nothing in /var/log/Xorg.0.log

x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers
 Available versions:  1.0.8774 1.0.8776 1.0.9629 [M]1.0.9742
 Installed:   1.0.9629

lsmod shows:
Module  Size  Used by
nvidia   4714740  16
i2c_viapro  8596  0
bt878  11016  0
tuner  46124  0
bttv  161524  1 bt878
video_buf  23620  1 bttv
ir_common  27396  1 bttv
compat_ioctl32  1728  1 bttv
v4l2_common14528  2 tuner,bttv
btcx_risc   5064  1 bttv
tveeprom   14224  1 bttv
videodev9536  1 bttv

Any ideas?


James

-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] USB mass storage - WD My Book

2006-11-12 Thread David Relson
You might also consider upgrading your kernel to 2.6.18.

I use BackupPC with an external USB HD.  With the 2.6.17 the usb
subsystem would choke before a full backup would complete.  By choke
I mean that 'ps' would show a 'D' state for all USB related processes.
Once the USB subsystem had choked, a command as simple as
'ls /mnt/usbhd' would result in another process hung in 'D' state.  

I've upgraded to 2.6.18 and it's doing much better, though its USB
support is not yet totally solid.

HTH,

David
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] skypemate

2006-11-12 Thread Thufir

I'm looking at:  https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/usbb2k-api/.
Does anyone have this working with
http://support.a-link.com/phonemate/IPU1.htm?

How about the skypemate software?

(Yes, I want to use closed source software, skypemate, for a
proprietary VoIP network on linux--the irony is thicker than...)

thanks,

Thufir
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] LDAP + Samba as PDC

2006-11-12 Thread Raphael Melo de Oliveira Bastos Sales

Hi everyone,

  I've been trying to set up an authentication server for a mixed LAN
(Windows and Linux clientes ) and I'm having problems with Samba.

  The way it is today, the Windows clients can access the Samba
server and each user can access it's home, by double-clicking on the
server icon on the screen that shows all the machines on the network.

  But I'm unable to register the client workstations on the server.
It says something like user name not found when I try to do it. But
the odd thing is, when I look in the LDAP server, there is a registry
of the client there.

  I'd like to know if anyone has managed to do this type of thing
and, if possible, could send me the Samba config file (smb.conf) so I
can see what I'm doing wrong.

 Here is my smb.conf file. If anyone detects what I'm doing wrong,
I'd be grateful.  :)

[global]
server string = %L
workgroup = WORKGROUP
announce as = NT Server

hosts allow = 192.168.0.0/24
security = user
encrypt passwords = yes
socket options = TCP_NODELAY SO_RCVBUF=8192 SO_SNDBUF=8192
interfaces = lo eth1
bind interfaces only = yes

local master = yes
os level = 100
domain master = yes
preferred master = yes

null passwords = no
#hide unreadable = yes

enable privileges = yes

domain logons = yes
logon script = login.bat
logon path = \\%L\profiles\%U
logon drive = H:
logon home = \\%L\%U\.9xprofile

wins support = yes
name resolve order = wins lmhosts host bcast
dns proxy = no

time server = yes
log file = /var/log/samba/log.%m
max log size = 50

passdb backend = ldapsam:ldaps://127.0.0.1:636/

ldap admin dn = cn=Laboratorio,dc=lara,dc=cic,dc=unb,dc=br
ldap port = 636
ldap suffix = dc=lara,dc=cic,dc=unb,dc=br
ldap server = ldaps://127.0.0.1:636/
ldap machine suffix = ou=Computers
ldap user suffix = ou=Users
ldap group suffix = ou=Groups
ldap idmap suffix = ou=Idmap
ldap delete dn = Yes
ldap password sync = yes

add group script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-groupadd -p %g
add machine script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-useradd -w %u
add user script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-useradd -m %u
add user to group script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-groupmod -m %u %g
delete group script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-groupdel %g
delete user script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-userdel %u
delete user from group script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-groupmod -x %u %g
passwd program = /usr/sbin/smbldap-passwd
passwd chat = *New password:* %n\r *New password (again):* %n\r \
*Password changed*
set primary group script = /usr/sbin/smbldap-usermod -g %g %u

idmap backend = ldap:ldaps://127.0.0.1:636/
idmap uid = 1-2
idmap gid = 1-2

unix charset = ISO8859-1

profile acls = yes

[netlogon]
path = /var/lib/samba/netlogon
guest ok = no
read only = yes
browseable = no

[profiles]
path = /var/lib/samba/profiles
browseable = no
writeable = yes
default case = lower
preserve case = no
short preserve case = no
case sensitive = no
hide files = /desktop.ini/ntuser.ini/NTUSER.*/
write list = @smbusers @root
create mask = 0600
directory mask = 0700
csc policy = disable

[homes]
path = /home/%U
browseable = no
valid users = %S
read only = no
guest ok = no
inherit permissions = yes
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Encrypting a file containing confidential info

2006-11-12 Thread Javier

  I'm using this :
 
  http://dev.gentoo.org/~agriffis/userpass/


I'm using KeePassX [1] to store my passwords and my private keys. This
is a gpl application with a windows version to use at work =) I think
keepassx is by far the best application to store passwords and
personal files I've found. I also found upm [2] but it  seems to be
with no mantainer


Best regards,
Javier

[1] http://keepassx.sf.net
[2] http://upm.sf.net
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Remove prelink and purge prelinked exec

2006-11-12 Thread Marco Calviani

Hi,


emerge -euD world


but: is this going to recompile everything (e option) or only those
that needs upgrade?

Regards,
mc
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] mounttool

2006-11-12 Thread Uwe Thiem
On 12 November 2006 22:35, Richard Fish wrote:
 On 11/11/06, Uwe Thiem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Hi folks,
 
  some distros come with a little utility called mounttool. I can loop
  mount images of encrypted filesystems (cryptsetup but for loop mounting).
  I can't seem to find it in gentoo. Does it hide somewhere? Or can someone
  recommend a similar tool in portage?

 What's wrong with:

 losetup /dev/loop/0 image
 cryptsetup create decrypted_image /dev/loop/0
 mount /dev/mapper/decrypted_image /mnt/encrypted

Simply that I didn't know about losetup. ;-)

Thanks!

Uwe

-- 
Mark Twain: I rather decline two drinks than a German adjective.
http://www.SysEx.com.na
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Re: What's the use of mozilla-launcher?

2006-11-12 Thread Alexander Skwar
· Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 On 11/12/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 In Knode/KDE, I configured, that firefox is to be used as the browser,
 so that when I click on a URL, it's loaded in firefox. I did this by
 modifying .kde/share/config/kdeglobals and adding/changing:

 [General]
 BrowserApplication=!/usr/bin/firefox
 
 You could also set this to /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/firefox to bypass
 mozilla-launcher.
 
 I now changed the /usr/bin/firefox script so, that it doesn't
 use mozilla-launcher anymore. Up to now, I can't find any problems.

 What problems did I overlook? And what's actually the use of
 mozilla-launcher with current firefoxes?

 What would break, if mozilla-launcher is no longer used?
 
 Nothing that I can tell

That's my impression as well.

 It looks to me like the main purpose of Gentoo's mozilla-launcher was
 to transparently support both firefox and firefox-bin (or mozilla and
 mozilla-bin, or thunderbid and thunderbird-bin, etc),

Hm, I don't understand. As it is right now, firefox-bin will install
/usr/bin/firefox-bin, won't it? Or will it also install /usr/bin/firefox?

 and to make sure 
 that new urls re-used an existing instance.

Yes, old versions of Mozilla  Firefox required this. But, just
like you say, current versions don't require this anymore.

 Current firefox versions 
 seem to support this internally, and you end up with firefox or
 firefox-bin installed in /usr/bin depending upon which one you
 install.

Yep.

 I don't see any reason why /usr/bin/firefox can't exec 
 /usr/lib/mozilla-firefox/firefox and /usr/bin/firefox-bin can't exec
 /opt/firefox/firefox.
 
 Cf. https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150404
 
 As you have probably already seen, I added a small patch to the bug,
 just in case the Gentoo devs want to keep it around.

Thanks!

I was thinking about this at the weekend. Is it a *MUST* that a
server understands that %2c is a ,?

 Or should I take this thread and purpose (ie. dump mozilla-launcher
 for at least firefox) to the dev list?
 
 Yeah, -dev would be the appropriate place to bring up dumping 
 mozilla-launcher.

Thanks.

Alexander Skwar
-- 
Tussman's Law:
Nothing is as inevitable as a mistake whose time has come.


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



Re: [gentoo-user] Remove prelink and purge prelinked exec

2006-11-12 Thread Uwe Thiem
On 12 November 2006 22:40, Jesús Guerrero wrote:

 I never trusted prelink. So, I dont trust it to un-prelink either.

Just out of curiosity: Why? As in it doesn't do its job or as in it makes 
the system unstable?

My whole system is prelinked and it is very stable. Startup times of C++ 
applications are shorter.


 The best way to make sure your binaries are not altered by 3rd party tools
 is this:

 emerge -euD world

Probably right.

Uwe

-- 
Mark Twain: I rather decline two drinks than a German adjective.
http://www.SysEx.com.na
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list



[gentoo-user] Re: Re: [OT] VMware legal question

2006-11-12 Thread Alexander Skwar
· Daniel Iliev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 Alexander Skwar wrote:
 · Daniel Iliev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

   
 Is it legal to do the following:

 1) emerge vmware-workstation
 2) build some images (within the 30 day trial period)
 3) emerge -C vmware-workstation (within the 30 day trial period)
 4) emerge vmware-player and use it to play the images created by
 vmware-workstation
 

 That might be legal, but why don't you go the absolutely legal
 way and use vmware-server instead of vmware-workstation?

 Alexander Skwar
   
 
 I have no strong reason for choosing vmw-workstation. There are two
 minor things that make me prefer it:
 
 - I am familiar with vmw-workstation and I've never seen vmw-server

There's no difference (as far as the interface is concerned).

 - VMW-Server is beta version 

It is not.

 and masked as testing package 

That might be.

Alexander Skwar
-- 
If God hadn't wanted you to be paranoid, He wouldn't have given you such
a vivid imagination.


-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list