[gentoo-user] Re: A plea for calm

Allan Gottlieb ha scritto: I am a delighted gentoo user who neither uses plaudis nor has any complaint with it or its developers. I also don't use kde, but have no complaint with it or its developers. I wonder if we could end this plaudis argument, as I don't see how the argument can actually h

[gentoo-user] Re: recent update broke meld

On 2008-09-15, Grant Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> After updating, meld no longer works. When started with no >>> command parameters, it works fine. When started with two file >>> names this happens: >>> >>># meld /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf /etc/ssmtp/._cfg_ssmtp.conf >>>ImportEr

[gentoo-user] Re: recent update broke meld

On 2008-09-15, Dale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Grant Edwards wrote: >> After updating, meld no longer works. When started with no >> command parameters, it works fine. When started with two file >> names this happens: >> >># meld /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf /etc/ssmtp/._cfg_ssmtp.conf >>I

[gentoo-user] recent update broke meld

After updating, meld no longer works. When started with no command parameters, it works fine. When started with two file names this happens: # meld /etc/ssmtp/ssmtp.conf /etc/ssmtp/._cfg_ssmtp.conf ImportError: could not import bonobo.ui (meld:7012): GnomeUI-WARNING **: While conne

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH fixed; now su doesn't work

Norberto Bensa wrote: Quoting Iain Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: sudo echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq scaling_governor won't work because the redirection is done as the user :) echo performace | sudo tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq scaling_governor now it do

Re: [gentoo-user] passwd won't work [SOLVED]

On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 20:57 -0300, Norberto Bensa wrote: > Quoting Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > I think this is the same problem that wouldn't let me use su -. > > > > Post /etc/pam.d/system-auth > > > > > This mes

[gentoo-user] Re: KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:11:18 +0200 "b.n." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What I mean is, for people that do not want to mess with overlays, at > what point is kde 4 on the path towards being x86 stable? Any news? No timetables, but some news recently.

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH fixed; now su doesn't work

Quoting Iain Buchanan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: sudo echo performance > /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq scaling_governor won't work because the redirection is done as the user :) echo performace | sudo tee /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq scaling_governor now it does :-P

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH fixed; now su doesn't work

Michael Sullivan wrote: I can ssh over to the old box now, but my su command doesn't work: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ su - su: Authentication failure From /var/log/messages: Sep 13 23:23:07 bullet sshd[24134]: pam_unix(sshd:session): session opened for user michael by (uid=0) Sep 13 23:23:10 bul

[gentoo-user] Re: Trying to block third party ip address with iptables...

On 2008-09-14, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 14 September 2008 11:04:47 pk wrote: > >> That was the intention. The site in question is my banks site. >> And they have a marketing survey company linked to their site >> which I want to hide from. If I want to use the banks inte

Re: [gentoo-user] passwd won't work

Quoting Michael Sullivan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: I think this is the same problem that wouldn't let me use su -. Post /etc/pam.d/system-auth This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

Freedom to surf with UnblockLists.com

t;http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=mothers-that-mean-business@googlegroups.com&q=from:%22[EMAIL PROTECTED]%22">[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat, 13 Sep 2008 23:05:03 GMT http://www.mail-archive.com/mothers-that-mean-business@googlegroups.com/msg00095.html Are You Looking For A Mo

Re: [gentoo-user] passwd won't work

On Sunday 14 September 2008 23:38:08 Michael Sullivan wrote: > On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 23:35 +0200, Pintér Tibor wrote: > > Michael Sullivan írta: > > > I think this is the same problem that wouldn't let me use su -. > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ passwd > > > passwd: Authentication token manipula

A plea for calm (was: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...)

I am a delighted gentoo user who neither uses plaudis nor has any complaint with it or its developers. I also don't use kde, but have no complaint with it or its developers. I wonder if we could end this plaudis argument, as I don't see how the argument can actually help anyone. thanks, allan

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

On Sunday 14 September 2008 22:38:42 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > yeah, sure. But no. Not lies. Or why were this guys forcefully retired? For > their behaviour. No, to prevent Gentoo from losing a major sponsor. > Also: > http://r0bertz.blogspot.com/2007/01/be-careful-when-you-are-on-paludis.htm

Re: [gentoo-user] passwd won't work

On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 23:35 +0200, Pintér Tibor wrote: > Michael Sullivan írta: > > I think this is the same problem that wouldn't let me use su -. > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ passwd > > passwd: Authentication token manipulation error > > > > I'd like to change my password, but I can't. Any

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

On Sunday 14 September 2008, David Leverton wrote: > On Sunday 14 September 2008 21:37:21 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > On Sunday 14 September 2008, David Leverton wrote: > > > On Sunday 14 September 2008 19:28:28 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > > > because not everybody wants to install that blo

Re: [gentoo-user] passwd won't work

On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 23:35 +0200, Pintér Tibor wrote: > Michael Sullivan írta: > > I think this is the same problem that wouldn't let me use su -. > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ passwd > > passwd: Authentication token manipulation error > > > > I'd like to change my password, but I can't. Any

Re: [gentoo-user] passwd won't work

Michael Sullivan írta: I think this is the same problem that wouldn't let me use su -. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ passwd passwd: Authentication token manipulation error I'd like to change my password, but I can't. Any thoughts? readonly filesystem? missing suid? t

Re: [gentoo-user] Is there a way to force python-updater to remerge python modules?

On Sun, 2008-09-14 at 22:09 +0200, Erik Hahn wrote: > > I'm trying to upgrade phpmyadmin and it fails saying it can't find a > > module called 'WebappConfig.config'. I googled this and found a Gentoo > > bug saying that it was because the OP didn't rebuild his python modules > > after upgrading py

[gentoo-user] passwd won't work

I think this is the same problem that wouldn't let me use su -. [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ passwd passwd: Authentication token manipulation error I'd like to change my password, but I can't. Any thoughts?

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

On Sunday 14 September 2008 21:35:08 David Leverton wrote: > On Sunday 14 September 2008 20:27:52 Mariusz Przygodzki wrote: > > Maybe "they" were waiting so many years because "they" have never > > asked users about what users really need and think about it. > > What? > > > "It's not that we hate y

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

On Sunday 14 September 2008 21:11:18 b.n. wrote: > Mariusz Przygodzki ha scritto: > > On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 7:41 PM, b.n. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Mariusz Przygodzki ha scritto: > >>> On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Erik Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > If only 4.1.1 was there... :

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

On Sunday 14 September 2008 22:02:08 Mariusz Przygodzki wrote: > You has just confirmed again your attitude towards Gentoo users who > want to use KDE4. Er, I have no attitude, either positive or negative, towards Gentoo users who want to use KDE 4. Kindly explain what the hell you're talking ab

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 10:55 PM, David Leverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 14 September 2008 21:39:39 Mariusz Przygodzki wrote: >> That's simple :) >> The mentioned quotation is an accurate conclusion > > That phrase does not make sense. > >> of discussion about "why Gentoo users shoud

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

On Sunday 14 September 2008 21:39:39 Mariusz Przygodzki wrote: > That's simple :) > The mentioned quotation is an accurate conclusion That phrase does not make sense. > of discussion about "why Gentoo users shoud use paludis to install > and test KDE4 desktop efficiently ?". That quotation is no

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

On Sunday 14 September 2008 21:37:21 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > On Sunday 14 September 2008, David Leverton wrote: > > On Sunday 14 September 2008 19:28:28 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > > because not everybody wants to install that bloated thing > > > > Not bloated. > > I am sorry: > extremly

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

Am Sonntag, 14. September 2008 22:37:21 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: > Oh, does paludis support and equivalent to 'keep-going' or > '--ignore-failures' Yes. Bye... Dirk

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 9:41 PM, David Leverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 14 September 2008 20:38:49 Mariusz Przygodzki wrote: >> No, it is NOT. > > Then what is it? If you're not sniping at me (or possibly the genkdesvn team) > for being involved with Exherbo, why did you post that h

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

On Sunday 14 September 2008, David Leverton wrote: > On Sunday 14 September 2008 19:28:28 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > because not everybody wants to install that bloated thing > > Not bloated. I am sorry: extremly bloated. > > > watch it devour config files > > Lies. oh really? what happens

Re: [gentoo-user] Is there a way to force python-updater to remerge python modules?

> I'm trying to upgrade phpmyadmin and it fails saying it can't find a > module called 'WebappConfig.config'. I googled this and found a Gentoo > bug saying that it was because the OP didn't rebuild his python modules > after upgrading python. I run python-updater and it dumps me back at > the pr

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

Am Sonntag, 14. September 2008 20:28:28 schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann: > Just another little trick by the paludis-group to > convert people. I started using paludis long before that overlay even existed. Didn't need any tricks. Bye... Dirk

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

On Sunday 14 September 2008 20:38:49 Mariusz Przygodzki wrote: > No, it is NOT. Then what is it? If you're not sniping at me (or possibly the genkdesvn team) for being involved with Exherbo, why did you post that here?

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 9:35 PM, David Leverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 14 September 2008 20:27:52 Mariusz Przygodzki wrote: >> Maybe "they" were waiting so many years because "they" have never >> asked users about what users really need and think about it. > > What? > >> "It's not t

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

On Sunday 14 September 2008 20:27:52 Mariusz Przygodzki wrote: > Maybe "they" were waiting so many years because "they" have never > asked users about what users really need and think about it. What? > "It's not that we hate you (unless we do). It's just that we have > nothing to offer you, and y

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 9:14 PM, David Leverton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 14 September 2008 19:28:28 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >> 'We need the features of paludis' was shown as bs. > > No-one said any such thing. They did say that they were sick of waiting years > and years for Port

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

On Sunday 14 September 2008 19:28:28 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > because not everybody wants to install that bloated thing Not bloated. > watch it devour config files Lies. > and be insulted by the troll-brigade. The only people who get insulted are those who repeatedly and deliberately sp

[gentoo-user] Is there a way to force python-updater to remerge python modules?

I'm trying to upgrade phpmyadmin and it fails saying it can't find a module called 'WebappConfig.config'. I googled this and found a Gentoo bug saying that it was because the OP didn't rebuild his python modules after upgrading python. I run python-updater and it dumps me back at the prompt with

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

Mariusz Przygodzki ha scritto: On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 7:41 PM, b.n. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mariusz Przygodzki ha scritto: On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Erik Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If only 4.1.1 was there... :') You know, there's an overlay... But unfortunately it requires p

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 14 September 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: >> Am Sonntag, 14. September 2008 19:16:08 schrieb Mariusz Przygodzki: >> > But unfortunately it requires plaudis ... >> >> Why is it unfortunate? > > because not ev

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

On Sunday 14 September 2008, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > Am Sonntag, 14. September 2008 19:16:08 schrieb Mariusz Przygodzki: > > But unfortunately it requires plaudis ... > > Why is it unfortunate? because not everybody wants to install that bloated thing - watch it devour config files and be insulte

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying to block third party ip address with iptables...

On Sunday 14 September 2008 11:04:47 pk wrote: > That was the intention. The site in question is my banks site. And they > have a marketing survey company linked to their site which I want to > hide from. If I want to use the banks internet services, which I pay > for, I don't want third parties to

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

On Sunday 14 September 2008 19:16:08 Mariusz Przygodzki wrote: > On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Erik Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If only 4.1.1 was there... :') > > > > You know, there's an overlay... > > But unfortunately it requires plaudis ... There's *two* kde overlays, developed in

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

Am Sonntag, 14. September 2008 19:16:08 schrieb Mariusz Przygodzki: > But unfortunately it requires plaudis ... Why is it unfortunate? Bye... Dirk

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

Not this one layman -a kdesvn-portage On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Mariusz Przygodzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Erik Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> If only 4.1.1 was there... :') >> You know, there's an overlay... > > But unfortunately it requires pla

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

On Sunday 14 September 2008, Mariusz Przygodzki wrote: > On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Erik Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If only 4.1.1 was there... :') > > > > You know, there's an overlay... > > But unfortunately it requires plaudis ... no it does not. kdesvn-portage has ebuilds for:

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 7:41 PM, b.n. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Mariusz Przygodzki ha scritto: >> >> On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Erik Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If only 4.1.1 was there... :') >>> >>> You know, there's an overlay... >> >> But unfortunately it requires plaudis

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

Mariusz Przygodzki ha scritto: On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Erik Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If only 4.1.1 was there... :') You know, there's an overlay... But unfortunately it requires plaudis ... At what point "stabilization" of KDE 4 is?

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 7:05 PM, Erik Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> If only 4.1.1 was there... :') > You know, there's an overlay... But unfortunately it requires plaudis ...

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying to block third party ip address with iptables... [SOLVED]

Tony Stohne wrote: Yes, putting the domain/IP address in the host file works, but has the negative side effect of being slower (at least if your host file is big. Parsing a big hosts file slows down networking overall because of the parsing process. If the file is small/short it's not a big prob

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

> If only 4.1.1 was there... :') You know, there's an overlay...

[gentoo-user] Re: Trying to block third party ip address with iptables...

On 2008-09-14, pk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote: >> DROP causes the packet to get blackholed without a trace. It >> sometimes happens to packets on internet so it is usual to try >> again and again until it succeeds or timeout (usually in tens >> of seconds) is reached.

[gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

In case you've missed it... the latest of the 3.5 version KDE is now in portage. It's still keyworded and masked, but still usable. Compiling it now. Cheers... If only 4.1.1 was there... :') Cheers again... -- "I was once told that adding ice to Makers Mark was alcohol abuse... Thank God!

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying to block third party ip address with iptables... [SOLVED]

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 pk said the following on 2008-09-14 13:25: > Ok, good to know. I tried something simpler; putting the domain in > /etc/hosts pointing to 127.0.0.1 (as suggested by Neil Bothwick). But > I'll keep this in mind for the future. Thanks for the input! >

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying to block third party ip address with iptables... [SOLVED]

On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 13:25:45 +0200, pk wrote: > Ok, good to know. I tried something simpler; putting the domain in > /etc/hosts pointing to 127.0.0.1 (as suggested by Neil Bothwick). Incidentally, you can get a file to add to your /etc/hosts that blocks all sorts of ad and popup server from http

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying to block third party ip address with iptables... [SOLVED]

Tony Stohne wrote: HTTP requests are sent over TCP, so try a REJECT with TCP reset instead. Something like this should do the trick, since the connection would be reset more or less instantly avoiding the timeout: iptables -A INPUT -s -p tcp -j REJECT --reject-with tcp-reset iptables -A

Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-server-1.5 and xf86-video-i810 [SOLVED]

On 9/14/08, Michal 'vorner' Vaner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > glxgears won't start for me any longer (Error: couldn't get an RGB, > Double-buffered visual). Not that I would really need that one, nor any [..] > Have you seen this error too? > Not this particular one, but I still get an error wi

Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-server-1.5 and xf86-video-i810 [SOLVED]

On 9/14/08, Sascha Hlusiak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since the driver was renamed from i810 to intel in upstream, I vote for > Gentoo to rename the package as well, from xf86-video-i810 to > xf86-video-intel. > Second this. Liviu

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying to block third party ip address with iptables...

On Sun, 14 Sep 2008 11:04:47 +0200, pk wrote: > That was the intention. The site in question is my banks site. And they > have a marketing survey company linked to their site which I want to > hide from. If I want to use the banks internet services, which I pay > for, I don't want third parties

Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-server-1.5 and xf86-video-i810 [SOLVED]

Am Sonntag, den 14.09.2008, 12:03 +0200 schrieb Liviu Andronic: > Dear all, > > === > Short version: > If you upgrade to xorg-x11-7.4, xorg-server-1.5 and > xf86-video-i810-2.4.2-r1, and X does not start, change Section > "Device" Driver "i810" to "intel" in your xorg.conf. Would have been > n

Re: [gentoo-user] xorg-server-1.5 and xf86-video-i810 [SOLVED]

Hello On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 12:03:34PM +0200, Liviu Andronic wrote: > Short version: > If you upgrade to xorg-x11-7.4, xorg-server-1.5 and > xf86-video-i810-2.4.2-r1, and X does not start, change Section > "Device" Driver "i810" to "intel" in your xorg.conf. Would have been > nice if Portage had

[gentoo-user] xorg-server-1.5 and xf86-video-i810 [SOLVED]

Dear all, === Short version: If you upgrade to xorg-x11-7.4, xorg-server-1.5 and xf86-video-i810-2.4.2-r1, and X does not start, change Section "Device" Driver "i810" to "intel" in your xorg.conf. Would have been nice if Portage had informed us of this. If nothing else works, revert to "vesa"

Re: [gentoo-user] OT joomla, defacement and remote shell

I was infected with PatriotCracker c99shell if someone know it. I'd like to know how can i protect php from the execution on particular function. I'dont know exactly what because i don't good php. that's why i attached the php file, until now i didn't think this is a virus. Searching on goog

Re: [gentoo-user] OT joomla, defacement and remote shell

Michele Schiavo wrote: > How can i prevent the execution of this file ? > > Please don't spread an infected file to the whole list, just give a description of your problem and people might be able to help. Right now it just looks like you're trying infect list members with something. Matt

RE: [gentoo-user][SOLVED] ldap samba pdc problem

Hi, Yes, this is the problem, stupid typo mistake. Arunas -Original Message- From: Norberto Bensa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Saturday, September 13, 2008 10:04 PM To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] ldap samba pdc problem Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: >> Sett

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying to block third party ip address with iptables...

Alan McKinnon wrote: On Saturday 13 September 2008 23:36:13 pk wrote: Hello, I am using shorewall on my local computer (the same I'm surfing the web with). My skills with iptables are not really good and my understanding of networking also has some holes in it... However, I'm trying to preve

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying to block third party ip address with iptables...

Michal 'vorner' Vaner wrote: DROP causes the packet to get blackholed without a trace. It sometimes happens to packets on internet so it is usual to try again and again until it succeeds or timeout (usually in tens of seconds) is reached. That was the intention. The site in question is my banks

[gentoo-user] OT joomla, defacement and remote shell

How can i prevent the execution of this file ? FILE QUARANTINED Antigen for SMTP removed ii4.php since it was found to be infected with Mal/PHPShell-A virus. signature.asc Description: Questa è una parte del messaggio firmata digitalmente

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying to block third party ip address with iptables...

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > On Saturday 13 September 2008 23:36:13 pk wrote: > Hello, > > I am using shorewall on my local computer (the same I'm surfing the web > ... > original site) shows up. While trying to block the additional ip address > with both "iptables -A INPUT -s x

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying to block third party ip address with iptables...

Alan McKinnon wrote: That's always going to be problematic. Firefox does not know that you have firewalled that address, so will continue doing exactly what it always did - send a SYN and wait for the response. So you'll need to tell Firefox that that IP is banned, in which case you don't ne

Re: [gentoo-user] Trying to block third party ip address with iptables...

On Saturday 13 September 2008 23:36:13 pk wrote: > Hello, > > I am using shorewall on my local computer (the same I'm surfing the web > with). My skills with iptables are not really good and my understanding > of networking also has some holes in it... However, I'm trying to > prevent firefox from

Re: [gentoo-user] How to minimise resource usage during emerge

On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 3:01 AM, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > Yeah, funny that. Maybe you can write the new RFC to synchronize all reply > mail to all other replies anywhere in the world. > > -- > alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com > > When they figure out how to use quantum entangl

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH fixed; now su doesn't work

Am Sonntag, 14. September 2008 06:27:05 schrieb Michael Sullivan: > I can ssh over to the old box now, but my su command doesn't work: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ su - > su: Authentication failure > > >From /var/log/messages: > > Sep 13 23:23:07 bullet sshd[24134]: pam_unix(sshd:session): session >