Hi everybody,
I updated udev from 171-r5 to 171-r6 and now i get several udevd boot
message as :
udevd[1389]: can not find '/lib/udev/rules.d/90-network.rules': No such
file or directory
udevd[1389]: can not find '/lib/udev/rules.d/95-keymap.rules': No such
file or directory
On 21/05/2012 2:48 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 20/05/12 12:41, Jesús J. Guerrero Botella wrote:
Just for sake of correctness, what the op wants is called normalization,
in the world of sound edition.
Actually, no. That's not what he wants. Normalization simply adjusts to
0db. How loud
I updated udev from 171-r5 to 171-r6 and now i get several udevd boot
message as :
udevd[1389]: can not find '/lib/udev/rules.d/90-network.rules': No such
file or directory
udevd[1389]: can not find '/lib/udev/rules.d/95-keymap.rules': No such
file or directory
..
and
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Andrew Lowe a...@wht.com.au wrote:
On 21/05/2012 2:48 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 20/05/12 12:41, Jesús J. Guerrero Botella wrote:
Just for sake of correctness, what the op wants is called normalization,
in the world of sound edition.
Actually, no.
I love my Gentoo-devs, but what is the train of thought here?
skype-2.2.0.35-r1 was ~amd64 yesterday. It's installed and working
fine. Today 2.2.0.35-r99 is ~amd64, which is perfectly fine, but
they've completely removed -r1 and now I'm required to unmask
emulation packages that only came out
On May 21, 2012 9:18 PM, Andrew Lowe a...@wht.com.au wrote:
[ze schnipp]
Aarrrggghhh, I'm getting confused. More background on my original
question. I work in a liquor store and the manager insists on playing the
usual crappy FM radio station, MORE HITS WHEN YOU WANT THEM AND WE HAVE
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
I love my Gentoo-devs, but what is the train of thought here?
skype-2.2.0.35-r1 was ~amd64 yesterday. It's installed and working
fine. Today 2.2.0.35-r99 is ~amd64, which is perfectly fine, but
they've completely removed
On 21/05/2012 10:51 PM, Pandu Poluan wrote:
On May 21, 2012 9:18 PM, Andrew Lowe a...@wht.com.au
mailto:a...@wht.com.au wrote:
[ze schnipp]
Aarrrggghhh, I'm getting confused. More background on my
original question. I work in a liquor store and the manager insists on
playing the
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
Dipping only slightly further offtopic, are they still pressing vinyl?
Sales of vinyl LPs have actually gone up for the past 6 years, selling
3.5 million new LPs last year, according to Nielsen SoundScan which is
the
Le 21/05/2012 16:27, Michael Hampicke a écrit :
I updated udev from 171-r5 to 171-r6 and now i get several udevd boot
message as :
udevd[1389]: can not find '/lib/udev/rules.d/90-network.rules': No such
file or directory
udevd[1389]: can not find '/lib/udev/rules.d/95-keymap.rules': No such
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
Dipping only slightly further offtopic, are they still pressing vinyl?
Sales of vinyl LPs have actually gone up for the past 6 years,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
I love my Gentoo-devs, but what is the train of thought here?
skype-2.2.0.35-r1 was ~amd64 yesterday. It's installed and working
fine. Today
On 21 May 2012, at 02:06, Michael Mol wrote:
...
And the final stitch is here:
http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/2030/brum3068brum30702.jpg
All Firefox gives me is a black window : can you check ?
Works on my system. It comes up all-black in geeqie, though; I had to
load it in
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 4:55 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
I love my Gentoo-devs, but what is the train of thought here?
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2012, 08:55:25 schrieb Mark Knecht:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
I love my Gentoo-devs, but what is the train of thought here?
skype-2.2.0.35-r1 was
on 2012-05-21 at 22:14 Andrew Lowe wrote:
I have no intention of applying whatever process to the media machine,
the tracks on that remain as ripped. I only want to fiddle the tracks
on the memory stick.
your files are mp3, right? what you want to do is fairly simple, just use
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Stroller
strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk wrote:
On 21 May 2012, at 02:06, Michael Mol wrote:
...
And the final stitch is here:
http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/2030/brum3068brum30702.jpg
All Firefox gives me is a black window : can you check ?
Works on
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:45 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
Dipping only slightly further offtopic, are they still pressing
On 2012-05-19 8:09 AM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
But stay away from OpenDNS like the plague. They are known to perform
false resolve, especially if the domain being resolved does not exist.
Simple to disable, been using OpenDNS for many years, no problems
whatsoever...
On 21 May 2012, at 02:07, Michael Mol wrote:
...
All digital Led Zep releases (i.e. including all CDs) are notoriously
poorly remastered, with excessive gain applied.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Loudness_war
So far they have deteriorated with each remastering / re-release.
Huge
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:31 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
I'm seriously wondering if there might not be something broken with
the .jpeg files I'm spitting out. That laptop (saffron) is in the
middle of an overdue emerge --update --deep --newuse @world, though.
(And I saw
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm seriously wondering if there might not be something broken with
the .jpeg files I'm spitting out. That laptop (saffron) is in the
middle of an overdue emerge --update --deep --newuse @world, though.
(And I saw it was
el 2012-05-20 a las 21:48 Nikos Chantziaras escribió:
On 20/05/12 12:41, Jesús J. Guerrero Botella wrote:
Just for sake of correctness, what the op wants is called
normalization, in the world of sound edition.
Actually, no. That's not what he wants. Normalization simply adjusts
to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/21/2012 05:10 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2012, 08:55:25 schrieb Mark Knecht:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Markos Chandras
hwoar...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Mark Knecht
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm seriously wondering if there might not be something broken with
the .jpeg files I'm spitting out. That laptop (saffron) is in the
After a recent update of dev-libs/libffi from version 3.0.10 to 3.0.11
the ebuild log suggests to run:
# revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib64/libffi.so.5'
and once finished running revdep-rebuild, it should be safe to
delete the old libraries, like so:
# rm '/usr/lib64/libffi.so.5'
However
On May 21, 2012 11:22 PM, luis jure l...@internet.com.uy wrote:
on 2012-05-21 at 22:14 Andrew Lowe wrote:
I have no intention of applying whatever process to the media machine,
the tracks on that remain as ripped. I only want to fiddle the tracks
on the memory stick.
your files are mp3,
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org wrote:
After a recent update of dev-libs/libffi from version 3.0.10 to 3.0.11
the ebuild log suggests to run:
# revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib64/libffi.so.5'
and once finished running revdep-rebuild, it should be safe to
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
SNIP
if you use testing, you have to deal with such kind of situations.
Using a known broken version is just stupid. There isn't a choice
between those two. There is only a choice between: use unstable or
stable. And
Am Montag, 21. Mai 2012, 10:54:08 schrieb Mark Knecht:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 10:13 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org
wrote: SNIP
if you use testing, you have to deal with such kind of situations.
Using a known broken version is just stupid. There isn't a choice
between those two.
on 05/21/2012 08:49 PM Michael Mol wrote the following:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org wrote:
After a recent update of dev-libs/libffi from version 3.0.10 to 3.0.11
the ebuild log suggests to run:
# revdep-rebuild --library '/usr/lib64/libffi.so.5'
and
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org wrote:
on 05/21/2012 08:49 PM Michael Mol wrote the following:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Thanasis thana...@asyr.hopto.org wrote:
After a recent update of dev-libs/libffi from version 3.0.10 to 3.0.11
the ebuild log
It looks like the @INC list (the directory list perl uses for finding
its modules) is not right or is not processed right. Only one
directory is looked into? (You can see @INC with perl -V, it should
be up to about ten directories on a Gentoo install.)
Unless you really, really want to know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/21/2012 07:16 PM, Thanasis wrote:
on 05/21/2012 08:49 PM Michael Mol wrote the following:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Thanasis
thana...@asyr.hopto.org wrote:
After a recent update of dev-libs/libffi from version 3.0.10 to
3.0.11 the
Hi,
since some update (which I was not able to trace back
but I think it was either baselayout or udev) I see
this message whenever I start any of my vserver
gentoo-guests:
OpenRC 0.9.8.4 is starting up Gentoo Linux (x86_64) [VSERVER]
* /proc is already mounted, skipping
* Mounting /run ...
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Jarry mr.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
since some update (which I was not able to trace back
but I think it was either baselayout or udev) I see
this message whenever I start any of my vserver
gentoo-guests:
OpenRC 0.9.8.4 is starting up Gentoo Linux (x86_64)
On 21-May-12 21:43, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
OpenRC 0.9.8.4 is starting up Gentoo Linux (x86_64) [VSERVER]
* /proc is already mounted, skipping
* Mounting /run ... mount: permission denied [ !! ]
...
What does it mean and how can I fix it?
Does the directory /run exists?
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Jarry mr.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21-May-12 21:43, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
OpenRC 0.9.8.4 is starting up Gentoo Linux (x86_64) [VSERVER]
* /proc is already mounted, skipping
* Mounting /run ... mount: permission denied [ !! ]
...
What does it
Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Jarry mr.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
On 21-May-12 21:43, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote:
OpenRC 0.9.8.4 is starting up Gentoo Linux (x86_64) [VSERVER]
* /proc is already mounted, skipping
* Mounting /run ... mount: permission denied
on 05/21/2012 09:52 PM Markos Chandras wrote the following:
I believe the old library appears to be owned by the new version
because it is preserved. Once you run the revdep-rebuild command,
everything should link to the new linker name and you should be safe
to remove the old library. See
On 05/21/2012 03:27 PM, Michael Hampicke wrote:
I updated udev from 171-r5 to 171-r6 and now i get several udevd
boot message as : udevd[1389]: can not find
'/lib/udev/rules.d/90-network.rules': No such file or directory
udevd[1389]: can not find '/lib/udev/rules.d/95-keymap.rules': No
On 05/21/2012 09:50 PM, Thanasis wrote:
on 05/21/2012 09:52 PM Markos Chandras wrote the following:
I believe the old library appears to be owned by the new version
because it is preserved. Once you run the revdep-rebuild
command, everything should link to the new linker name and you
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:38:34AM +0200, David Haller wrote:
I bought my current internal laptop disk for Christmas 2008. It's a Samsung
HM500JI (with 500 GB). Early on I noticed that, according to smartctl, its
Load_Cycle_Count is increasing every 2 or 3 seconds. I even asked Samsung
Hello,
have someone installed XFCE in Version 4.10 and can me tell, has same
with the windows which are now in the back of the menupanel?
Screenshot:
Old: http://silviosiefke.de/img/ext/old.png
New: http://silviosiefke.de/img/ext/new.png
They are others Relation in Screenshots, one is my
You guys might find this study from google interesting:
http://static.googleusercontent.com/external_content/untrusted_dlcp/research.google.com/en/us/archive/disk_failures.pdf
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Frank Steinmetzger war...@gmx.de wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 11:38:34AM +0200,
well, because that expanding option for window buttons is
disappeared in this (4.10) version.
so You'd better to check below link and find Window Buttons section.
http://www.xfce.org/about/tour?lang=en
It will helps you. cheers :D
Seong-ho, Cho.
2012/5/22 Silvio Siefke siefke_lis...@web.de:
You need to add a spacer to your panel.
Right click on the panel.
Select the panel pop out menu.
Select Add New Items
Select Separator.
It will add it to the panel at the end, from what is see you might want
it to the right of your Windows List. When you do get it to where you
want it just
Hello,
Today during an emerge -Dauvt world, portage asked me to update a
bunch of Ruby USE flags and install a bunch of new RUBY projects.
Here is a snippet:
http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=PK8ubZeB
Normally I just give portage the green light to install whatever it
wants, but the USE change
48 matches
Mail list logo
