Re: [gentoo-user] trouble downgrading systemd and virtual/udev

2013-09-25 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:00 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > On 26/09/13 04:30, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: >> >> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:24 PM, wrote: >>> >>> I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable). >>> >>> I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents >

Re: [gentoo-user] trouble downgrading systemd and virtual/udev

2013-09-25 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 26/09/13 04:30, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:24 PM, wrote: I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable). I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents systemd-204. OK. So I need to downgrade virtual/udev to 200. I thought e

Re: [gentoo-user] trouble downgrading systemd and virtual/udev

2013-09-25 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:00 PM, wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > >> On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:24 PM, wrote: >>> I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable). >>> >>> I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents >>> systemd-204. >>

Re: [gentoo-user] trouble downgrading systemd and virtual/udev

2013-09-25 Thread gottlieb
On Wed, Sep 25 2013, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:24 PM, wrote: >> I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable). >> >> I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents >> systemd-204. >> >> OK. So I need to downgrade virtual/udev to 200

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: trouble downgrading systemd and virtual/udev

2013-09-25 Thread gottlieb
On Wed, Sep 25 2013, walt wrote: > On 09/25/2013 03:24 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote: >> I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable). >> >> I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents >> systemd-204. >> >> OK. So I need to downgrade virtual/udev to 200. >> >

Re: [gentoo-user] trouble downgrading systemd and virtual/udev

2013-09-25 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 5:24 PM, wrote: > I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable). > > I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents > systemd-204. > > OK. So I need to downgrade virtual/udev to 200. > > I thought >emerge -1 =virtual/udev-200 =sys-ap

[gentoo-user] Re: trouble downgrading systemd and virtual/udev

2013-09-25 Thread walt
On 09/25/2013 03:24 PM, gottl...@nyu.edu wrote: > I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable). > > I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents > systemd-204. > > OK. So I need to downgrade virtual/udev to 200. > > I thought >emerge -1 =virtual/udev-200

Re: [gentoo-user] Problems building www-client/uzbl-9999

2013-09-25 Thread Walter Dnes
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:33:47AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote > > That looks like a horrible bug in the ebuild - it's trying to install to > the live filesystem. ebuilds install to the work directory in > /var/tmp/portage/ and the merge phase moves the files over to /usr. > > You can either file

[gentoo-user] trouble downgrading systemd and virtual/udev

2013-09-25 Thread gottlieb
I want to downgrade systemd from 207-r2 to 204 (highest stable). I currently have virtual/udev-206-r2 installed, which prevents systemd-204. OK. So I need to downgrade virtual/udev to 200. I thought emerge -1 =virtual/udev-200 =sys-apps/systemd-204 would do it. But this failed (see below)

Re: [gentoo-user] Managing multiple systems with identical hardware

2013-09-25 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 25/09/2013 23:18, Grant wrote: > I'm trying to reduce the number of systems I spend time managing. My > previous plan was to set up multiseat on a small number of systems. > Now I'm wondering if it would be better to use multiple systems with > identical hardware and manage them in some sort of

[gentoo-user] Managing multiple systems with identical hardware

2013-09-25 Thread Grant
I'm trying to reduce the number of systems I spend time managing. My previous plan was to set up multiseat on a small number of systems. Now I'm wondering if it would be better to use multiple systems with identical hardware and manage them in some sort of an optimized way so that each set of iden

Re: [gentoo-user] what does this mean:rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks

2013-09-25 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 25/09/2013 16:31, 东方巽雷 wrote: > Yes,I have search some webpages.But not sure if this question can be > solved and how to be solved. But did you read THAT page in the kernel docs? p.s. 2 things, - please do not top-post - please do not post in HTML > > > 2013/9/25 Alan McKinnon

Re: [gentoo-user] what does this mean:rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks

2013-09-25 Thread 东方巽雷
Yes,I have search some webpages.But not sure if this question can be solved and how to be solved. 2013/9/25 Alan McKinnon > On 25/09/2013 12:56, 东方巽雷 wrote: > > My pc have a random boot problem.I can hardly make it clear when will > occur. > > The kern.log shows INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge reminder

2013-09-25 Thread Bruce Hill
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 05:12:06PM +0400, the wrote: > On 09/25/13 16:42, Bruce Hill wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:40:41PM +0400, the wrote: > >> > >> emerge reminder to use dispatch-conf after autounmask > >> disappeared. want it back > > > > autounmask should disappear. It's a bad idea,

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge reminder

2013-09-25 Thread the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/25/13 16:42, Bruce Hill wrote: > On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:40:41PM +0400, the wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >> >> emerge reminder to use dispatch-conf after autounmask >> disappeared. want it back > > autounmask shoul

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge reminder

2013-09-25 Thread Bruce Hill
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:40:41PM +0400, the wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > emerge reminder to use dispatch-conf after autounmask disappeared. > want it back autounmask should disappear. It's a bad idea, because it *creates* single version (=) unmasked packages that

Re: [gentoo-user] what does this mean:rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks

2013-09-25 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 25/09/2013 12:56, 东方巽雷 wrote: > My pc have a random boot problem.I can hardly make it clear when will occur. > The kern.log shows INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 0} > (detected by 1, t=10002 jiffies, g=18446744073709551325, > c=18446744073709551324, q=13). > When this happen on

[gentoo-user] what does this mean:rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks

2013-09-25 Thread 东方巽雷
My pc have a random boot problem.I can hardly make it clear when will occur. The kern.log shows INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 0} (detected by 1, t=10002 jiffies, g=18446744073709551325, c=18446744073709551324, q=13). When this happen on boot,the kernel seems hung and will take a

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge reminder

2013-09-25 Thread Hinnerk van Bruinehsen
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 01:40:41PM +0400, the wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > emerge reminder to use dispatch-conf after autounmask disappeared. > want it back > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird -

[gentoo-user] emerge reminder

2013-09-25 Thread the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 emerge reminder to use dispatch-conf after autounmask disappeared. want it back -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSQq+YAAoJEK64IL1uI2hafn4H/

Re: [gentoo-user] Btrfs: how to fix slow sequential write performance?

2013-09-25 Thread William Kenworthy
On 25/09/13 16:54, Marc Stürmer wrote: > Greetings fellow Gentooistas, > > at the moment I am doing some testing and evaluating of Btrfs on my own > system. Why? Just because I can and I am curious about it. > > Because I am doing that for evaluation purpose please don't give advise > like "go ZF

[gentoo-user] Btrfs: how to fix slow sequential write performance?

2013-09-25 Thread Marc Stürmer
Greetings fellow Gentooistas, at the moment I am doing some testing and evaluating of Btrfs on my own system. Why? Just because I can and I am curious about it. Because I am doing that for evaluation purpose please don't give advise like "go ZFS" or something like that, thank you. Kernel is

Re: [gentoo-user] Problems building www-client/uzbl-9999

2013-09-25 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 25/09/2013 09:33, Walter Dnes wrote: > Since this is a ebuild, I'm not filing a bugzilla bug. Note that > www-client/uxbl-2012.05.14 built OK. Apparently, the latest git sources > have some features I really want, that are not in any of the other > ebuilds. So I'm trying to build it.

Re: [gentoo-user] Problems building www-client/uzbl-9999

2013-09-25 Thread Walter Dnes
Arrgh; forgot to attach the log. Here it is. -- Walter Dnes I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications buildlog.txt.gz Description: Binary data

[gentoo-user] Re: Unable to catch kernel crash dump

2013-09-25 Thread Grant
> I've been getting a kernel oops for awhile that is worse than ever in > 3.11.1. It seems to be related to my XHCI USB port. I followed the > instructions here: > > http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Kernel_Crash_Dumps > > but /proc/vmcore doesn't exist after I reboot the system after a > crash. I did

[gentoo-user] Problems building www-client/uzbl-9999

2013-09-25 Thread Walter Dnes
Since this is a ebuild, I'm not filing a bugzilla bug. Note that www-client/uxbl-2012.05.14 built OK. Apparently, the latest git sources have some features I really want, that are not in any of the other ebuilds. So I'm trying to build it. The build first pulled down and installed g

Re: [gentoo-user] LVM2+mdraid5+LUKS+systemd (was Re: LVM2+mdraid+systemd)

2013-09-25 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 23/09/13 17:37, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: On Sep 23, 2013 6:01 AM, "Tanstaafl" mailto:tansta...@libertytrek.org>> wrote: > > Man... watching this discussion just makes me want to avoid systemd like the plague/all the more... Please don't top post. Please disable HTML from your mail clie