On Nov 7, 2013 9:47 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Mine isn't skewed to one side, it's just a fraction to large. It seems
to be cut off by a few pixels all the way around. Watching a movie tho, no
problem. Using it for a puter monitor tho, slight issue. To give a bit of
a idea, about
Daniel Frey wrote:
On Nov 7, 2013 9:47 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com
mailto:rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Mine isn't skewed to one side, it's just a fraction to large. It
seems to be cut off by a few pixels all the way around. Watching a
movie tho, no problem. Using it for a puter
On 2013-11-08, Daniel Frey djqf...@gmail.com wrote:
I am assuming this is a TV? All TVs apply overscan to inputs and that
is what you are seeing.
FWIW, the history of overscan (why it existed in CRT-based TVs and why
it was kept when they switched to Plasma/LCD) is rather interesting:
Does sys-fs/udev-init-scripts serve any purpose on a system that:
1. Has systemd installed and openrc uninstalled
2. Has INSTALL_MASK=/etc/init.d/ set in make.conf
I'm asking because sys-fs/udev-init-scripts is a dependency of sys-
apps/systemd and I can't figure out why.
I currenly added it to
Here is a very interesting read, posted by GKH:
http://kroah.com/log/blog/2013/09/02/booting-a-self-signed-linux-kernel/
Anyone tried this yet?
curiously,
James
On Nov 8, 2013 4:27 PM, Pavel Volkov negai...@gmail.com wrote:
Does sys-fs/udev-init-scripts serve any purpose on a system that:
1. Has systemd installed and openrc uninstalled
2. Has INSTALL_MASK=/etc/init.d/ set in make.conf
I'm asking because sys-fs/udev-init-scripts is a dependency of
6 matches
Mail list logo
