On Saturday 21 Mar 2015 03:37:59 »Q« wrote:
> > Second, I "fixed" the problem once by rebooting my wireless router,
> > but got the same error again early this morning -- which I "fixed"
> > once again by rebooting my wireless router. This makes me worry that
> > somebody out there in the evil int
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 06:41:31PM -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote
> Your CPU is an example of what I'm saying, not just because it
> doesn't have 64 bit extensions but because it doesn't have MMX
> (at least according to the specs) and according to the GCC manual
> -march=atom means: "Intel Atom
Michael Cook wrote:
>
> Have you tried running python-updater? I have no idea if it would fix
> it, but worth a try?
>
>
I don't know if it would or not but removing the links that was
triggering it then running revdep-rebuild did fix it. It seems this is
one of those times that portage just can'
Have you tried running python-updater? I have no idea if it would fix it,
but worth a try?
On Mar 23, 2015 17:38, "Dale" wrote:
Howdy,
For the past week or so, I been getting this endless loop with
preserved-rebuild. I did a emerge -ev world last night and it still
gives me the same thing. I'm
Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 03/23/2015 05:12 PM, Dale wrote:
>> Is it me or does the search function at fgo pretty much stink? I find a
>> lot of times I type in something and where it should show what I
>> searched for, it is blank which means it kicked all my search terms
>> out. Surely it ain't ju
On 03/23/2015 05:12 PM, Dale wrote:
> Is it me or does the search function at fgo pretty much stink? I find a
> lot of times I type in something and where it should show what I
> searched for, it is blank which means it kicked all my search terms
> out. Surely it ain't just me. o_O
It's not jus
On Monday, March 23, 2015 6:48:39 PM Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Fernando Rodriguez
> wrote:
> > On Monday, March 23, 2015 6:18:46 PM Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Walter Dnes
wrote:
> >> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 09:25:53PM -0400, Fernando
On Monday 23 March 2015 21:51:04 Walter Dnes wrote:
> I have one of the earliest Atom chips. Some people have a hard time
> believing this, but it's a 32-bit-only chip; a couple of lines from
> /proc/cpuinfo
>
> model name : Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU Z520 @ 1.33GHz
> address sizes : 32 bit
Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
>
> http://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Preserve-libs
>
Wow. I searched the forums, googled and nothing helped. I never
thought to check the wiki, of course, I rarely go to the wiki either. I
keep forgetting the thing exists.
Is it me or does the search function at fgo prett
What does it mean? It shows up on the screen at the start of
"emerge", but it's not in the log files. Is it possibly a message from
the server that emerge is grabbing the tarball from?
--
Walter Dnes
I don't run "desktop environments"; I run useful applications
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 6:41 PM, Fernando Rodriguez
wrote:
> On Monday, March 23, 2015 6:18:46 PM Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
>> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 09:25:53PM -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote
>> >
>> >> I guess gcc devs are careful when using t
On Monday, March 23, 2015 6:18:46 PM Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 09:25:53PM -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote
> >
> >> I guess gcc devs are careful when using the model numbers (Intel
> >> lists 3 for Atoms, gcc uses only two
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 09:25:53PM -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote
>
>> I guess gcc devs are careful when using the model numbers (Intel
>> lists 3 for Atoms, gcc uses only two so that may account for the
>> models I mentioned) but the chance o
Alan McKinnon gmail.com> writes:
> > Sounds like you're volunteering, Alan.
> I do have some of the required skills, and I have free time right now.
Ah; stepping up are we? I'll be hoping you are taking requests on
the 'portage thingy' ?
How'z about extending emerge with a few extra commands
On Monday, March 23, 2015 4:38:08 PM Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> For the past week or so, I been getting this endless loop with
> preserved-rebuild. I did a emerge -ev world last night and it still
> gives me the same thing. I'm stumped with the info emerge is giving me
> again.
>
> root@fireball
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 09:25:53PM -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote
> I guess gcc devs are careful when using the model numbers (Intel
> lists 3 for Atoms, gcc uses only two so that may account for the
> models I mentioned) but the chance of error is there. The -mno-xxx
> flags would safeguard aga
Howdy,
For the past week or so, I been getting this endless loop with
preserved-rebuild. I did a emerge -ev world last night and it still
gives me the same thing. I'm stumped with the info emerge is giving me
again.
root@fireball / # emerge @preserved-rebuild
These are the packages that would
On Sunday 22 Mar 2015 09:37:19 Julian Simioni wrote:
> Interesting. When I used IMAP in Mutt, rather than offlineimap, I was
> really frustrated by the constant lag within Mutt from syncing with the
> server.
I experienced the same problem, but this was more pronounced on IMAP accounts
with many
On Monday, March 23, 2015 5:37:28 PM hw wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> syslog-ng keeps reporting:
>
>
> Mar 23 17:34:41 sunflo-mx syslog-ng[27532]: Error suspend timeout has
> elapsed, attempting to write again; fd='15'
> Mar 23 17:34:41 sunflo-mx syslog-ng[27532]: Suspending write operation
> because of
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 01:17:12PM -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> On Friday, March 20, 2015 10:15:03 AM Michael Mair-Keimberger wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 04:44:55PM -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote:
> > > On Thursday, March 19, 2015 9:11:02 PM Michael Mair-Keimberger wrote:
> > > > Hi L
Hi,
syslog-ng keeps reporting:
Mar 23 17:34:41 sunflo-mx syslog-ng[27532]: Error suspend timeout has
elapsed, attempting to write again; fd='15'
Mar 23 17:34:41 sunflo-mx syslog-ng[27532]: Suspending write operation
because of an I/O error; fd='15', time_reopen='60'
while there's plenty o
On 23/03/15 14:16, Matti Nykyri wrote:
On Mar 23, 2015, at 14:13, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 23/03/15 11:46, Peter Humphrey wrote:
The consensus seems to be that there's no point in trying to prevent a user
from rebooting the machine, and I'm happy to go along with that.
The remaining questi
On 23 March 2015 at 10:46, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday 22 March 2015 14:36:36 Jc García wrote:
> > 2015-03-22 4:30 GMT-06:00 Peter Humphrey :
> > > On Saturday 21 March 2015 16:20:17 Jc García wrote:
> > >> > Interesting. But as I said ealier, I can reboot the system when I am
> > >> > a
>
> On Mar 23, 2015, at 14:13, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>
>> On 23/03/15 11:46, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> The consensus seems to be that there's no point in trying to prevent a user
>> from rebooting the machine, and I'm happy to go along with that.
>>
>> The remaining question is: why is the user
On 23/03/15 11:46, Peter Humphrey wrote:
The consensus seems to be that there's no point in trying to prevent a user
from rebooting the machine, and I'm happy to go along with that.
The remaining question is: why is the user not allowed to halt it?
Because there's no keyboard shortcut for halt
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 5:46 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
> The remaining question is: why is the user not allowed to halt it?
>
Keep in mind there are many ways that a unix-like OS can be used. It
could be running on a laptop, or it could be running on a multi-user
system where 50 people are log
just security problem. server should not be that easy to be interrupted!
在2015年03月23日 17:46，Peter Humphrey 写道:
On Sunday 22 March 2015 14:36:36 Jc García wrote:
> 2015-03-22 4:30 GMT-06:00 Peter Humphrey :
> > On Saturday 21 March 2015 16:20:17 Jc García wrote:
> >> > Interesting. But as I said e
On Monday 23 March 2015 11:59:23 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Maybe I'll have a deeper look into portage's code with a view to
> improving this area. No promises thought :-)
So we'll expect to see you again, wringing your hands and shivering, in
about six months then...
:)
--
Rgds
Peter.
On 23/03/2015 11:55, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday 22 March 2015 23:22:33 Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
>> This is one of the things that is starting to real get on my damn tits
>> about portage, for about 2 years now. It's not an easy problem to solve,
>> and to be honest, portage is not helping at
On Sunday 22 March 2015 23:22:33 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> This is one of the things that is starting to real get on my damn tits
> about portage, for about 2 years now. It's not an easy problem to solve,
> and to be honest, portage is not helping at all. You have two options in
> running it: don't u
On Sunday 22 March 2015 14:36:36 Jc García wrote:
> 2015-03-22 4:30 GMT-06:00 Peter Humphrey :
> > On Saturday 21 March 2015 16:20:17 Jc García wrote:
> >> > Interesting. But as I said ealier, I can reboot the system when I am
> >> > a
> >> > user by Ctrl+Alt+Delete. The user can reboot the system,
31 matches
Mail list logo
