On 23.04.2015 23:06, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> I am sure it will enter portage soon ...
btw ... there you go:
https://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/sys-devel/gcc/gcc-5.1.0.ebuild?view=markup
On 23.04.2015 19:18, james wrote:
> Stefan G. Weichinger xunil.at> writes:
>> I now try to build gcc-5.1.0 with itself ... and maybe later I will try
>> system in a btrfs-subvolume.
>
> Hello Stephan,
>
> Very interesting.
emerge -e @system
didn't get very far in my btrfs-subvolume (a snaps
"J. Roeleveld" writes:
> On 8 April 2015 14:43:02 GMT-07:00, lee wrote:
>>hydra writes:
>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 3:20 PM, lee wrote:
>>>
symack writes:
Other than that, unless you really do need full virtualization: I'm
finding Linux containers to be far more manageab
hydra writes:
> You mean the documentation at Gentoo about Xen sucks or the upstream
> documentation? What information are you missing from there? Maybe we can
> add the missing pieces for Xen being more accessible and easier to use,
> what do you think? :)
I mean the documentation they have o
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 3:08 PM, Guillaume Poulin
wrote:
> I'm currently contributing to a python project still supporting python
> 2.6. Since python 2.6 is no more in portage tree, I currently have no
> way to run the unit tests locally.
>
> Is there an easy way to install python 2.6? I don't nee
I'm currently contributing to a python project still supporting python
2.6. Since python 2.6 is no more in portage tree, I currently have no
way to run the unit tests locally.
Is there an easy way to install python 2.6? I don't need other
packages support for python 2.6, just a python 2.6 installa
On 04/22/2015 12:17 PM, walt wrote:
> I just did a huge update on an older ~amd64 machine, and now only
> three out of a dozen or so kernel modules load during bootup, which
> leaves a lot of hardware in an unusable state.
Thanks to everyone who replied. The infuriating thing about this problem
i
On 23.04.2015 18:57, james wrote:
> Stefan G. Weichinger xunil.at> writes:
>
>>
>> On 23.04.2015 17:43, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>>
>>> I will see if I get that figured out ... got to get the kernel-options
>>> and dracut modules right.
>>
>> first try started booting but couldn't mount rootfs
Stefan G. Weichinger xunil.at> writes:
>
> On 23.04.2015 10:12, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
>
> > I've just renamed the gcc-6.0.0_alpha20150412.ebuild (the 6 must be
typo) from toolchain overlay
> > to gcc-5.1.0.ebuild which I have attached.
> > It worked just fine here.
very cool! thx.
> I no
Am Donnerstag, 23. April 2015, 07:51:30 schrieb james:
> I'll wait at least until there is an ebuild of some kind. Those folks
> (toolchain) that put out the 5.0.x builds should have one for 5.1
> soon.. I do agree with the subliminal suggestion that I should
> find those gcc compile and in
Stefan G. Weichinger xunil.at> writes:
>
> On 23.04.2015 17:43, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> > I will see if I get that figured out ... got to get the kernel-options
> > and dracut modules right.
>
> first try started booting but couldn't mount rootfs ... and now the box
> hangs there and I
On 23.04.2015 17:43, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
> I will see if I get that figured out ... got to get the kernel-options
> and dracut modules right.
first try started booting but couldn't mount rootfs ... and now the box
hangs there and I can't press the power button (only PS/2 attached
keyboard
On my amd64 laptop, on resume from hibernation, wicd almost always
fails to restart. This problem goes back to when I set up the machine,
over a year ago, but it seems to have gotten a lot worse in the last
month or so.
I'm using openrc and sys-power/hibernate-script. I run mostly stable;
AFAIK
2015-04-23 10:52 GMT-03:00 J. Roeleveld :
> On Thursday, April 23, 2015 08:41:42 AM Francisco Ares wrote:
> > 2015-04-22 14:10 GMT-03:00 Francisco Ares :
>
>
>
> > > Thanks for the tip, gonna try to understand everything from that
> thread,
> > > but meanwhile I'm going to do what Alon has sugges
On 23.04.2015 17:09, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Some pointers:
> - Unpack your stage tarball.
> - Build the kernel and initramfs on an existing Gentoo system and copy
> them over.
> - Add the gentoo kernel and initramfs to menu.lst.
> - Clear out the root password in /etc/shadow.
> - Reboot the box.
>
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 10:49 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
>
> I plan to install a fresh gentoo linux in parallel to an existing SLES
> 10 server.
>
> The server runs with /boot and / on 2 raid1 devices, there is a large
> RAID6 array building the PV for several logical volumes with data on it.
I plan to install a fresh gentoo linux in parallel to an existing SLES
10 server.
The server runs with /boot and / on 2 raid1 devices, there is a large
RAID6 array building the PV for several logical volumes with data on it.
The idea is to have the server booted from live media (chroot does not
On Thu, 23 Apr 2015 07:32:54 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
> What I'd like is the output you get with
>
> 'grep -ir "searchstring" .'
>
> which includes the line of text from each matching file that contains
> the searchstring, like this:
>
> > ./user/Maildir/cur/1429731479.M511050P25876.hostname,S=3
On Thursday, April 23, 2015 08:41:42 AM Francisco Ares wrote:
> 2015-04-22 14:10 GMT-03:00 Francisco Ares :
> > Thanks for the tip, gonna try to understand everything from that thread,
> > but meanwhile I'm going to do what Alon has suggested.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Francisco
>
> Hi, again.
2015-04-22 14:10 GMT-03:00 Francisco Ares :
>
>
> 2015-04-22 10:54 GMT-03:00 Neil Bothwick :
>
> On Wed, 22 Apr 2015 10:34:05 -0300, Francisco Ares wrote:
>>
>> > A few months ago I got rid of oracle's java jre and jdk in favor of
>> > icedtea.
>> >
>> > Now, when issuing an "emerge -tpvuDN world"
On 4/17/2015 5:59 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> Since you want to search the entire contents f the current directory,
> there is no need to pass grep a list of directories (especially not an
> incomplete list), use "grep -lr ."
Ok, thanks Neil, but this is still not what I'm looking for... here's a
On 23.04.2015 10:12, Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> I've just renamed the gcc-6.0.0_alpha20150412.ebuild (the 6 must be typo)
> from toolchain overlay
> to gcc-5.1.0.ebuild which I have attached.
> It worked just fine here.
same here, just a bit later ;-)
I now try to build gcc-5.1.0 with itself ...
On 04/23/2015 07:51:30 AM, james wrote:
> Nikos Chantziaras gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> > > So is my best hope the "toolchain" repo ?
>
> > You can always compile and install locally in your $HOME directory.
> 5.1
> > was just released, so you can try that.
>
> I hear you. It'd take me a long tim
23 matches
Mail list logo
