On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 4:02 PM, Grant Edwards
wrote:
> ../../third_party/vulkan-validation-layers/src/loader/debug_report.c:50:5:
> error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 or C11 mode
>
As stated by others, switching to GCC-5 or newer would be best.
Otherwise, try adding
Ühel kenal päeval, E, 31.07.2017 kell 21:00, kirjutas Grant Edwards:
> On 2017-07-31, Mateusz Lenik wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:02:34PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> > > ../../third_party/vulkan-validation-
> > > layers/src/loader/debug_report.c:50:5:
> > > note: use option -std=c99, -s
On 31/07/2017 18:30, R0b0t1 wrote:
>> The problem i see is that admin. is not free to change the packages
>> set, that is dictated by a profile. -- Like i have pointed out, once i
>> tried to remove SSH (for the example, so that here can be another
>> package, and it was the first (base?) profile),
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 5:00 PM, Grant Edwards
wrote:
> On 2017-07-31, Mateusz Lenik wrote:
>
>> otherwise you'd have to pass one of the suggested flags to the
>> compiler somehow.
>
> Aren't required gcc versions and/or flags supposed to be specified
> in the ebuild?
>
Yes, if a newer version o
On 2017-07-31, Mateusz Lenik wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:02:34PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> ../../third_party/vulkan-validation-layers/src/loader/debug_report.c:50:5:
>> note: use option -std=c99, -std=gnu99, -std=c11 or -std=gnu11 to
>> compile your code
>> ../../third_party/vulkan-
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 08:02:34PM +, Grant Edwards wrote:
> ../../third_party/vulkan-validation-layers/src/loader/debug_report.c:50:5:
> note: use option -std=c99, -std=gnu99, -std=c11 or -std=gnu11 to
> compile your code
> ../../third_party/vulkan-validation-layers/src/loader/debug_report.c
It looks like chromeium 60 just went stable for AMD64. Unfortunately,
it doesn't seem to build for me. I've googled the gcc error message
from the build log, and the only thing I can find is somebody claiming
it's caused by a bungled upgrade to gcc 5.x. I haven't upgrade to gcc
5.x, so that does
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Ста Деюс wrote:
> Hi, Neil.
>
>
> On Sun, 30 Jul 2017 20:48:38 +0100, among other, you wrote:
>
>> > A profile is only a starting point, a default set of packages and
>> > USE
>> flags for common scenarios. It is up to the user/admin to decide which
>> packages th
On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 11:29 AM, Ста Деюс wrote:
>
> The problem i see is that admin. is not free to change the packages
> set, that is dictated by a profile. -- Like i have pointed out, once i
> tried to remove SSH (for the example, so that here can be another
> package, and it was the first (ba
Hi, Rich.
On Sun, 30 Jul 2017 16:03:48 -0400, among other, you wrote:
> > You should note that nobody with an @gentoo.org game is playing your
> 20 questions game either.
And that's OK.
Sthu.
Hi, Neil.
On Sun, 30 Jul 2017 20:48:38 +0100, among other, you wrote:
> > A profile is only a starting point, a default set of packages and
> > USE
> flags for common scenarios. It is up to the user/admin to decide which
> packages they want to install on each system, so a one size fits all
> ap
On 2017-07-30, tu...@posteo.de wrote:
> I found this:
>
> "This is a basic, but useful command that simply screenshots the current
> active window.
> $ maim -i $(xdotool getactivewindow) ~/mypicture.jpg
> "
[...]
> For what such a command is good for?
It's only an example. If yo
Am Sonntag, 30. Juli 2017, 01:44:27 CEST schrieb Peter Humphrey:
>
> They are trying though. Daniel Vratil wrote this on the KDE-PIM list
>
> yesterday:
> > If you use KMail (or Kontact), please help us, the KDE PIM developers, to
> > get a better picture of how you use it so that we know which pa
On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 1:04 PM, wrote:
> Giving this via commandline it always shoots the terminal window (I
> see no way to edit a commandline without activateing the terminal
> window).
>
> For what such a command is good for?
>
maim is typically used by the type of person who wants to take
14 matches
Mail list logo
