Peter Humphrey wrote:
> I assumed the two terms were interchangeable. Is that not so?
SATA: based on the IDE legacy over a serial bus, caps out at about
530mb/sec,
NVME: connects directly to a PCIe 4x bus, no overhead of any kind, caps
out at ~2gb/sec...
(legacy HDD: 50mb/sec ideal sequential
чт, 18 февр. 2021 г. в 01:10, Michael :
>
> On Wednesday, 17 February 2021 21:45:35 GMT gevisz wrote:
>
> > Most probably, both my SATA disks have connection problems as
> > Oli Schmidt suggested from the very beginning, and because they
> > both have it, it points to the motherboard that already
On 2021-02-18, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> That's what I was using, but I now run my own BitWarden server, so I get
> the convenience and the security.
Ah-ha! And _that's_ what I could use an $11 VPS for!
Am Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 08:14:59PM + schrieb Peter Humphrey:
> > Provided the M.2 is using NVME instead of SATA
>
> I assumed the two terms were interchangeable. Is that not so?
M.2 is the physical connector. SATA and NMVE are logical protocols (well,
there are also SATA-specific connectors
Am Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 10:07:17AM -0600 schrieb Dale:
> > Call me Ishmael^wold-fashioned. I don’t trust the Internet with anything
> > sensitive. Even if the other party behaves trustworthy (trustwortily?). If
> > it’s on someone else’s system, it’s out of my reach. A password database not
> >
Am Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 03:04:21PM + schrieb Neil Bothwick:
> > So the natural answer for my password needs is keepass (by now the XC
> > variant). I sync it between my Linux machines with all other files using
> > unison.
>
> That's what I was using, but I now run my own BitWarden server,
On Thursday, 18 February 2021 11:12:44 GMT J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thursday, February 18, 2021 12:10:45 PM CET Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Thursday, 18 February 2021 08:20:54 GMT Hund wrote:
> > > A SSD is just fine. You're not gaining any performance with a M.2 disk
> > > anyway.
> >
> >
Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Am Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 06:04:01PM -0600 schrieb Dale:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> Lastpass is forcing people to use only one device type or pay a fee.
>> I've used the free version of Lastpass for years and it works well for
>> me.
> Call me Ishmael^wold-fashioned. I don’t trust
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 10:36:46 -0500, John Covici wrote:
> > That's what I was using, but I now run my own BitWarden server, so I
> > get the convenience and the security.
>
> If I were to run my own bitwarden server, which seems not to be in
> the tree, is there a way I can use windows, mac
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 10:04:21 -0500,
Neil Bothwick wrote:
>
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:22:52 +0100, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
>
> > Call me Ishmael^wold-fashioned. I don’t trust the Internet with anything
> > sensitive. Even if the other party behaves trustworthy (trustwortily?).
> > If it’s on
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 08:12:02 -0500,
Michael wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> On Thursday, 18 February 2021 06:54:29 GMT Alan Grimes wrote:
>
> > The other discovery was that my /home drive is a 3.0 tb Toshiba unit
> > from 2014... man time flies!!! =P This means that the thing should
> > probably be replaced
On Thu, 18 Feb 2021 15:22:52 +0100, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> Call me Ishmael^wold-fashioned. I don’t trust the Internet with anything
> sensitive. Even if the other party behaves trustworthy (trustwortily?).
> If it’s on someone else’s system, it’s out of my reach. A password
> database not
Am Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 06:04:01PM -0600 schrieb Dale:
> Howdy,
>
> Lastpass is forcing people to use only one device type or pay a fee.
> I've used the free version of Lastpass for years and it works well for
> me.
Call me Ishmael^wold-fashioned. I don’t trust the Internet with anything
On Thursday, 18 February 2021 06:54:29 GMT Alan Grimes wrote:
> The other discovery was that my /home drive is a 3.0 tb Toshiba unit
> from 2014... man time flies!!! =P This means that the thing should
> probably be replaced due to being old as hell...
I've got disks spinning around for more
On Thursday, February 18, 2021 12:10:45 PM CET Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Thursday, 18 February 2021 08:20:54 GMT Hund wrote:
> > A SSD is just fine. You're not gaining any performance with a M.2 disk
> > anyway.
>
> Sorry, but that just isn't true. The difference is dramatic. I speak from
>
On Thursday, 18 February 2021 08:20:54 GMT Hund wrote:
> A SSD is just fine. You're not gaining any performance with a M.2 disk
> anyway.
Sorry, but that just isn't true. The difference is dramatic. I speak from
experience.
--
Regards,
Peter.
I overhauled my computer today, found two things...
My waterblock is clogged again, down to a trickle of flow, not bad
enough to be dangerous at idle but I've had to order some fresh O-rings
from Germany and will need to rebuild the damn thing again.
Some of the nickel plating is scraped off
Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
> Dale,
>
> On Wednesday, 2021-02-17 23:08:12 -0600, you wrote:
>
>> ...
>> Still, they are closed source. If
>> their code was open source then it could be that the hack would not have
>> happened since someone would have spotted the
Dale,
On Wednesday, 2021-02-17 23:08:12 -0600, you wrote:
> ...
> Still, they are closed source. If
> their code was open source then it could be that the hack would not have
> happened since someone would have spotted the hole the hackers used.
I don't
On 18/02/2021 08:20, Hund wrote:
Any thoughts about running a drive this old, and what I should be
looking at as a replacement?
No matter how old or new your disk is, keep your backups current and in working
shape.
If it's old, I would just keep an extra eye on the S.M.A.R.T. status and
>My waterblock is clogged again, down to a trickle of flow, not bad
>enough to be dangerous at idle but I've had to order some fresh O-rings
>from Germany and will need to rebuild the damn thing again.
Unless you're a hardcore overclocker, there's really no reason to bother with
it, especially
21 matches
Mail list logo
