Re: [gentoo-user] Reverse Proxy with Apache2
On 1/18/22 1:26 PM, Raphael Mejias Dias wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
I've modified a little my config file:
Okay.
ProxyPass "zmz" "http://raphaxx.intranet:8280/zm/
ProxyPassReverse "zmz" "http://raphaxx.intranet:8280/zm/;
I would expect the first parameter to be anchored / fully qualified from
within the site's URL. E.g.
ProxyPass "/zmz" "http://raphaxx.intranet:8280/zm/;
ProxyPassReverse "/zmz" "http://raphaxx.intranet:8280/zm/;
My expectation would be that for this to proxy any
requests to the "/zmz" path (sub-directory?) to the "/zm/" path on an
HTTP server on port 8280 of raphaxx.intranet.
Aside: Make sure that "raphaxx.intranet" resolves where you want it to.
Be mindful of IPv4 vs IPv6.
My ssl is ok, the ssl redirect is on default.conf
Okay.
But this ProxyReverse, I've been trying in many ways, another file, and
so on, but nothing works.
I have the following in a config file for a service that I disabled a
few months ago.
ProxyPass "/" "http://127.0.0.1:8080/;
ProxyPassReverse "/" "http://127.0.0.1:8080/;
This was in use in a Named Virtual Host that reverse proxied everything
to port 8080 listening on localhost (127.0.0.1).
Aside: Port 8080 on localhost (127.0.0.1) was actually an SSH remote
port forward to a web server running on the remote client machine.
You will want to adjust the source path ("/") and the destination
("http://127.0.0.1:8080/;) as you need. But this is copied verbatim
from a site that I disabled recently. (Disabling is typical Ubuntu /
Debian remove a sym-link so that the config is not in the sites-enabled
directory. No changes to the actual config file.)
About the VirtualHost for the 8280, I'm guessing it was not necessary,
because the 8280 is the VM and the VM has its own apache2.
ACK
I have a nat rule to redirect 192.168.0.15:8280 to my VM server
192.168.2.100:80 on my root server 192.168.0.15.
Okay. That could be a complicating factor.
You say "NAT rule". I'm taking that to mean a Destination NAT (DNAT)
rule for port forwarding. The important bit is that it doesn't alter
the source IP (SNAT). So you could potentially be running into a TCP
triangle scenario.
Unless you have a specific reason to use the NAT rule, I would strongly
suggest altering the ProxyPass(Reverse) rules to use the proper target.
ProxyPass "/zmz" "http://192.168.2.100:80/zm/;
ProxyPassReverse "/zmz" "http://192.168.2.100:80/zm/;
Just avoid the potential for a TCP triangle all together.
Considering the potential complexity, please share what sort of errors /
failures you are seeing. Given the remote nature of the real server
(from the point of view of the Apache HTTPD instance), please provide
output of a TCP dump for tests. Let's make sure that all the bases are
covered.
About Caddy, I do not want to install another server and deal with
another config.
I can fully understand and appreciate that.
Thanks!
You're welcome.
--
Grant. . . .
unix || die
Re: [gentoo-user] Reverse Proxy with Apache2
On 1/18/22 1:30 PM, Anatoly Laskaris wrote: Age migth mean a lot when we are talking about software. Modern software usually is easier to configure, has sane defaults, more secure and has integration with other modern software. I'll concede that those points are /possibilities/. But they are not guaranteed. And is much more popular in the community meaning better support. I do not agree that something being more common means, much less implies, better support. There are an awful lot of bad recommendations all over the Internet. I'm was not talking about adding software, I was talking about replacing software. But you are. Replacing something inherently implies adding and / or configuring something old with something new. Time saved in managing complex software that does a simple task can be applied elsewhere. Sometimes yes, sometimes no. In regards to "already having a software" most modern applications don't require "having" them. It works out of the box, usually with one command and you can switch parts of your infrastructure without pain thanks to containers (or statically linked binaries in golang and rust) without downtime (if done right). "if done right" is so over the top the /operative/ /phrase/ of that statement that it's not even remotely funny. Dynamic ports with service discovery == no port conflicts. There's no dynamic ports / service discovery in what the OP asked about. The OP asked how to configure a feature (reverse proxy) of the software that they are already (Apache HTTPD) using for a part of a URL (https://192.168.0.15:443/zv) for a service that's currently listening on a given IP and port pair (https://192.168.0.15:443/). So please elaborate on what the right way is to replace (as in add new and remove old) the existing software /or/ split the IP & port (192.168.0.15 TCP port 443) across multiple daemons is. I would very much be interested in learning how to do this the right way. I can think of many ways to do this, but all of which require something intercepting the port & IP pair at some point up stream. Not that old as apache. I take your statement to be that the Apache HTTPD developers and administrators have more experience than Nginx / caddy / traefik developers and administrators by the simple fact that it has existed longer. What /new/ thing are you using to communicate with caddy / traefik if you don't use the old crufty IPv4 / IPv6? Nginx is still widly used (contrast to apache), The first four reports I found when searching for web server popularity show that Apache and Nginx are the top two popular servers. Which one is number one depends on the report. Link - Global Web Server Market Share January 2022 - https://hostadvice.com/marketshare/server/ Link - Web and Application Servers Software Market Share - https://www.datanyze.com/market-share/web-and-application-servers--425 Link - Usage statistics of web servers - https://w3techs.com/technologies/overview/web_server Link - January 2022 Web Server Survey - https://news.netcraft.com/archives/category/web-server-survey/ My opinion is that being the first, or the close second is a good indication that Apache is still wildly used. but is being replaced by caddy/traefik. Apache is ancient and I've never seen it running in production. If you've never seen the first or second most popular web server running in production, I can only question where you are looking. I know multiple people that have run Apache HTTP Server (both by Apache and rebranded by IBM / Oracle) web server in production on multiple platforms for each and every year for the last two decades. I've personally run Apache in production for that entire time. -- Grant. . . . unix || die
Re: [gentoo-user] TLD for home LAN?
On 1/18/22 1:50 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: No, I'm talking about the opposite situation. I'm talking about you have foo.local resolvable via mDNS, but not DNS - then there is a chance you won't be able to access the host. It's the same problem just opposite directions. The solution is to use something to unify the .local name in the mDNS and uDNS name spaces. This can be done via a gateway that speaks both protocols. E.g. listens for mDNS queries as well as being an authoritative uDNS server for the .local domain / TLD. It's not /simple/ but nor is it /impossible/. -- Grant. . . . unix || die
RE: [gentoo-user] TLD for home LAN?
> >-Original Message- >From: Rich Freeman >Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 12:50 PM >To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org >Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] TLD for home LAN? > >On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 3:12 PM Laurence Perkins wrote: >> >> >> >> >>-Original Message- >> >>From: Rich Freeman >> >>Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 11:41 AM >> >>To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org >> >>Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] TLD for home LAN? >> >> >> >>On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 12:28 PM Laurence Perkins >> >>wrote: >> >>> >> >>> The standard does not prohibit the names being resolvable via unicast >> >>> DNS as well, though it does recommend that you make sure the two >> >>> resolution paths return consistent results since most systems will take >> >>> the first response they get. >> >> >> >>If a host queries DNS first, and obtains an NXDOMAIN from an authoritative >> >>name server, I'm not sure most would even check mDNS. I think I had that >> >>issue back when I was using .local before I heard of zeroconfig. >> >> >> >> Right. If you have .local names registered with your DNS, but not >> resolvable via mDNS... > >No, I'm talking about the opposite situation. I'm talking about you have >foo.local resolvable via mDNS, but not DNS - then there is a chance you won't >be able to access the host. Basically having an authoritative nameserver for >.local may disable mDNS on your network for some devices. > >-- >Rich > Yeah, I can see that also being a possibility, and it's likely to be annoying to deal with since different clients can have different preferred resolver orders and may or may not take the authoritative part seriously and any program hard-coded to use mDNS will work fine, so there could be a big wad of inconsistent behaviour that obscures what's going on. LMP
Re: [gentoo-user] TLD for home LAN?
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 3:12 PM Laurence Perkins wrote: > > > > >>-Original Message- > >>From: Rich Freeman > >>Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 11:41 AM > >>To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > >>Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] TLD for home LAN? > >> > >>On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 12:28 PM Laurence Perkins > >>wrote: > >>> > >>> The standard does not prohibit the names being resolvable via unicast DNS > >>> as well, though it does recommend that you make sure the two resolution > >>> paths return consistent results since most systems will take the first > >>> response they get. > >> > >>If a host queries DNS first, and obtains an NXDOMAIN from an authoritative > >>name server, I'm not sure most would even check mDNS. I think I had that > >>issue back when I was using .local before I heard of zeroconfig. > >> > > Right. If you have .local names registered with your DNS, but not resolvable > via mDNS... No, I'm talking about the opposite situation. I'm talking about you have foo.local resolvable via mDNS, but not DNS - then there is a chance you won't be able to access the host. Basically having an authoritative nameserver for .local may disable mDNS on your network for some devices. -- Rich
Re: [gentoo-user] Reverse Proxy with Apache2
On 2022-01-18 22:17, Grant Taylor wrote: Age of something doesn't mean a lot. - TCP/IP is from the 80s and yet we are still using it. - OSI is newer than IPv4. - IPv6 is newer than IPv4 and OSI. Yet we are still talking about the venerable IPv4. Age migth mean a lot when we are talking about software. Modern software usually is easier to configure, has sane defaults, more secure and has integration with other modern software. And is much more popular in the community meaning better support. I view adding /additional/ software / daemons as poor form, especially when the /existing/ software can do the task at hand. I'm was not talking about adding software, I was talking about replacing software. Time saved in managing complex software that does a simple task can be applied elsewhere. In regards to "already having a software" most modern applications don't require "having" them. It works out of the box, usually with one command and you can switch parts of your infrastructure without pain thanks to containers (or statically linked binaries in golang and rust) without downtime (if done right). Don't overlook the port conflict. Dynamic ports with service discovery == no port conflicts. Why start the email asking why something old is used and then finish the email suggesting the possibility of using something else old? Not that old as apache. Nginx is still widly used (contrast to apache), but is being replaced by caddy/traefik. Apache is ancient and I've never seen it running in production. Nginx is from the same (premicroservice) age as apache and will probably we easier to understand than something like Traefik.
Re: [gentoo-user] Reverse Proxy with Apache2
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 4:17 PM Grant Taylor <
gtay...@gentoo.tnetconsulting.net> wrote:
> On 1/18/22 11:24 AM, Anatoly Laskaris wrote:
> > I'm sorry for not answering to the question directly, but why use
> apache2?
>
> - Because Apache is already installed and listening on the port in
> question.
> - Because that's what the OP asked about.
> - Because it might be IBM / Oracle HTTP Server which are re-rolls of
> Apache HTTP Server.
> - $REASONS
>
> > There are modern alternatives ...
>
> Age of something doesn't mean a lot.
>
> - TCP/IP is from the 80s and yet we are still using it.
> - OSI is newer than IPv4.
> - IPv6 is newer than IPv4 and OSI.
>
> Yet we are still talking about the venerable IPv4.
>
> > And something completely different like Traefik
> > (https://doc.traefik.io/traefik/getting-started/quick-start/) which is
> > geared towards modern cloud native infrastructure with containers and
> > workload orchestrators like Nomad or Kubernetes.
> > Usually you don't configure Traefik with static config file, but with
> > metadata and annotations in K8S and Consul so it is dynamic and reactive.
>
> I view adding /additional/ software / daemons as poor form, especially
> when the /existing/ software can do the task at hand.
>
> Don't overlook the port conflict.
>
> > Or you can use nginx (which is already considered pretty old and clunky,
> > but it is much easier than apache still).
>
> Why start the email asking why something old is used and then finish the
> email suggesting the possibility of using something else old?
>
>
>
> --
> Grant. . . .
> unix || die
>
> Hello,
I've modified a little my config file:
ServerName raphaxx.intranet
ServerAdmin raph...@gmail.com
DocumentRoot /var/www/html
ErrorLog ${APACHE_LOG_DIR}/error.log
CustomLog ${APACHE_LOG_DIR}/access.log combined
ProxyRequests Off
ProxyPreserveHost On
Order deny,allow
Allow from all
ProxyPass "zmz" "http://raphaxx.intranet:8280/zm/;
ProxyPassReverse "zmz" "http://raphaxx.intranet:8280/zm/;
SSLEngine on
SSLCertificateFile
/etc/ssl/certs/apache-selfsigned_raphaxx.crt
SSLCertificateKeyFile
/etc/ssl/private/apache-selfsigned_raphaxx.key
SSLOptions +StdEnvVars
SSLOptions +StdEnvVars
My ssl is ok, the ssl redirect is on default.conf
But this ProxyReverse, I've been trying in many ways, another file, and so
on, but nothing works.
About the VirtualHost for the 8280, I'm guessing it was not necessary,
because the 8280 is the VM and the VM has its own apache2.
I have a nat rule to redirect 192.168.0.15:8280 to my VM server
192.168.2.100:80 on my root server 192.168.0.15.
About Caddy, I do not want to install another server and deal with another
config.
Thanks!
RE: [gentoo-user] TLD for home LAN?
>>-Original Message- >>From: Rich Freeman >>Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 11:41 AM >>To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org >>Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] TLD for home LAN? >> >>On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 12:28 PM Laurence Perkins >>wrote: >>> >>> The standard does not prohibit the names being resolvable via unicast DNS >>> as well, though it does recommend that you make sure the two resolution >>> paths return consistent results since most systems will take the first >>> response they get. >> >>If a host queries DNS first, and obtains an NXDOMAIN from an authoritative >>name server, I'm not sure most would even check mDNS. I think I had that >>issue back when I was using .local before I heard of zeroconfig. >> Right. If you have .local names registered with your DNS, but not resolvable via mDNS, then if you plug in a device which tries to assign a conflicting name and it only checks mDNS for conflicts (the standard only *says* to check mDNS for conflicts, even though checking DNS as well would seem to always be a good idea) you could end up with DNS and mDNS returning different results. This can be confusing if different devices have different resolver preference orders. So, if you're going to have your DNS resolve .local names it's a really good idea to provide those names via mDNS as well. At least if there's any significant chance of a conflict arising. LMP
Re: [gentoo-user] TLD for home LAN?
On Tue, Jan 18, 2022 at 12:28 PM Laurence Perkins wrote: > > The standard does not prohibit the names being resolvable via unicast DNS as > well, though it does recommend that you make sure the two resolution paths > return consistent results since most systems will take the first response > they get. If a host queries DNS first, and obtains an NXDOMAIN from an authoritative name server, I'm not sure most would even check mDNS. I think I had that issue back when I was using .local before I heard of zeroconfig. Obviously do as you will but I see no point in not having it available. After all, if for whatever reason you plug in a host and it doesn't end up configuring the IP you expected, it would be useful to be able to access it via hostname.local and actually reach the host instead of whatever your DNS server things the host ought to be. I have DNS set up for just about everything on my LAN but it is still really handy when I get some new device and it broadcasts itself as raspbian.local or whatever. Granted, I can just check my DHCP logs but zeroconfig is handy. It even works on a switch without any DHCP/DNS server at all (there is an IP space set aside for this purpose which hosts will autoconfigure for and discover each other). -- Rich
Re: [gentoo-user] Reverse Proxy with Apache2
On 1/18/22 11:24 AM, Anatoly Laskaris wrote: I'm sorry for not answering to the question directly, but why use apache2? - Because Apache is already installed and listening on the port in question. - Because that's what the OP asked about. - Because it might be IBM / Oracle HTTP Server which are re-rolls of Apache HTTP Server. - $REASONS There are modern alternatives ... Age of something doesn't mean a lot. - TCP/IP is from the 80s and yet we are still using it. - OSI is newer than IPv4. - IPv6 is newer than IPv4 and OSI. Yet we are still talking about the venerable IPv4. And something completely different like Traefik (https://doc.traefik.io/traefik/getting-started/quick-start/) which is geared towards modern cloud native infrastructure with containers and workload orchestrators like Nomad or Kubernetes. Usually you don't configure Traefik with static config file, but with metadata and annotations in K8S and Consul so it is dynamic and reactive. I view adding /additional/ software / daemons as poor form, especially when the /existing/ software can do the task at hand. Don't overlook the port conflict. Or you can use nginx (which is already considered pretty old and clunky, but it is much easier than apache still). Why start the email asking why something old is used and then finish the email suggesting the possibility of using something else old? -- Grant. . . . unix || die
Re: [gentoo-user] Reverse Proxy with Apache2
On 1/18/22 9:57 AM, Raphael Mejias Dias wrote: Hello, Hi, I'm trying to setup a reverse proxy on my apache2 server to serve an another apache2 server running on a vm, basically my root apache2 is at 192.168.0.15 and my second apache2 is at 192.168.0.15:8280. My idea is to have 192.168.0.15/zm as 192.168.0.15:8280. If I understand you correctly, you want to take a sub-directory / path from a site on one port (80) and reverse proxy it to the root of another site on a different port (8280) on the same host. Am I understanding you correctly? The question is, how to do it? I need to finish my $CAFFEINE before I formulate a complete answer. But I'm sharing an incomplete answer to hopefully get you down the road sooner. I've looked up some guides, but it is difficult to setup. Like most things Apache, it's mostly difficult the first (few) time(s) you do it. Once you've done it, it's not as bad. My config: I'm redacting the things that I think aren't germane to the question at hand. ServerName 192.168.0.15 DocumentRoot /var/www/html ServerName 192.168.0.15/zm ProxyPass /zm http://192.168.0.15:8280/zm ProxyPassReverse /zm http://192.168.0.15:8280/zm Does it look any good? I question the use of "_default_" and "*", both of which on port 443. My fear is that there is a large potential for confusion ~> conflict between these two named virtual hosts. I'm also not seeing the config for the instance listening on port 8280. If the second named virtual host was put in place specifically in support of the reverse proxy, then I think you want to refactor it as a ... under the original named virtual host. The other thing that I'm not seeing is the ... configuration that I would expect to see. E.g. Orderdeny,allow Deny fromall Allow from 192.0.2.0/24 Allow from 198.51.100.0/24 Allow from 203.0.113.0/24 Beyond that, I need to finish my $CAFFEINE, have some clarification from you, and look at specific failures. N.B.: The access and error log files are going to be your friend when configuring this (or really anything Apache httpd related) as they will let you know when your configuration is correct but things like permission (Allow from) are the problem. Also apache(2)ctl configtest is your friend. Thanks. You're welcome. -- Grant. . . . unix || die
Re: [gentoo-user] Reverse Proxy with Apache2
On 2022-01-18 19:57, Raphael Mejias Dias wrote: Hello, I'm trying to setup a reverse proxy on my apache2 server to serve an another apache2 server running on a vm, basically my root apache2 is at 192.168.0.15 and my second apache2 is at 192.168.0.15:8280 [1]. My idea is to have 192.168.0.15/zm [2] as 192.168.0.15:8280 [1]. The question is, how to do it? I've looked up some guides, but it is difficult to setup. I'm sorry for not answering to the question directly, but why use apache2? There are modern alternatives with very simple configuration and low operational overhead like Caddy (https://caddyserver.com/) where reverse proxy is just one command: caddy reverse-proxy --to 127.0.0.1:9000 And something completely different like Traefik (https://doc.traefik.io/traefik/getting-started/quick-start/) which is geared towards modern cloud native infrastructure with containers and workload orchestrators like Nomad or Kubernetes. Usually you don't configure Traefik with static config file, but with metadata and annotations in K8S and Consul so it is dynamic and reactive. Or you can use nginx (which is already considered pretty old and clunky, but it is much easier than apache still).
RE: [gentoo-user] TLD for home LAN?
-Original Message- From: tastytea Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2022 2:54 AM >To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org >Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] TLD for home LAN? > >On 2022-01-15 10:33+ Peter Humphrey wrote: > >> Hello list, >> >> Rich F said recently, "I'd avoid using the .local TLD due to RFC >> 6762." >> > Glancing at that RFC, if you want to be compliant (which, it's *your* network, and this is all link-local only, so there's no reason you *have* to be), all you need to do is make sure that any .local addresses you assign are resolvable via multicast DNS. The standard does not prohibit the names being resolvable via unicast DNS as well, though it does recommend that you make sure the two resolution paths return consistent results since most systems will take the first response they get. If you assign .local addresses which aren't resolvable via mdns then there is the possibility that some piece of software will only check mdns and not regular dns before grabbing a name and cause a conflict. But as long as it's your network and your devices that's not terribly hard to sort out should it ever happen. LMP
Re: [gentoo-user] How to find a bounced message
Jack wrote: > On 1/18/22 11:45, Neil Bothwick wrote: >> On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 16:39:13 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: >> >>> I got a bounced-message message yesterday, giving its number. How can I >>> find it? The Gentoo archives site doesn't include a search function, >>> nor message IDs. >> Send a mail to the List-Help address in the headers of any list message. >> It will send you a list of the commands you can use, including the >> one to >> retrieve a message by number. > > That message number is used by mlmmj, the mailing list manager > software, but unfortunately, it doesn't translate to anything that > lets you find the message in any archive. You can request a re-send > of the message, as Neil says, which will work if the problem was > transient. However, if the message was blocked by any filter (spam > related?) between the list server and you, the resent version will get > blocked the same way. As far as I can tell, the only way to get a > reference to find the message in the archives is to send a message to > an admin. I've been meaning to ask about this on the mlmmj mailing > list, but have not yet done so. > > Jack > > > > I've followed the instructions in the past and never got the lost messages. I think what it is, the list software is blocking spam, as you suggest, that we shouldn't even know about but for some reason, the software tells us anyway. I suspect it is deleted which means there is nothing to retrieve. Therefore, when we request it, we get nothing. Either way, I've never had it work. Whatever the reason is. Dale :-) :-)
[gentoo-user] Reverse Proxy with Apache2
Hello,
I'm trying to setup a reverse proxy on my apache2 server to serve an
another apache2 server running on a vm, basically my root apache2 is at
192.168.0.15 and my second apache2 is at 192.168.0.15:8280.
My idea is to have 192.168.0.15/zm as 192.168.0.15:8280.
The question is, how to do it?
I've looked up some guides, but it is difficult to setup.
My config:
ServerAdmin root@192.168.0.15
ServerName 192.168.0.15
DocumentRoot /var/www/html
ErrorLog ${APACHE_LOG_DIR}/error.log
CustomLog ${APACHE_LOG_DIR}/access.log combined
SSLEngine on
SSLCertificateFile /etc/ssl/certs/apache-selfsigned.crt
SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/ssl/private/apache-selfsigned.key
SSLOptions +StdEnvVars
SSLOptions +StdEnvVars
ServerName 192.168.0.15/zm
ServerAlias zm
ErrorLog ${APACHE_LOG_DIR}/error.log
CustomLog ${APACHE_LOG_DIR}/access.log combined
ProxyPass /zm http://192.168.0.15:8280/zm
ProxyPassReverse /zm http://192.168.0.15:8280/zm
SSLEngine On
SSLProxyEngine On
SSLCertificateFile /etc/ssl/certs/apache-selfsigned.crt
SSLCertificateKeyFile /etc/ssl/private/apache-selfsigned.key
Does it look any good?
Thanks.
M.S. Raphael Mejias Dias
Nuclear Engineer | Reactors
Secure e-mail: raphael.mejias.d...@protonmail.com
PGP Key for raph...@gmail.com:
https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?op=get=0x87BC5A746072F951
Re: [gentoo-user] How to find a bounced message
On 1/18/22 11:45, Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 16:39:13 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: I got a bounced-message message yesterday, giving its number. How can I find it? The Gentoo archives site doesn't include a search function, nor message IDs. Send a mail to the List-Help address in the headers of any list message. It will send you a list of the commands you can use, including the one to retrieve a message by number. That message number is used by mlmmj, the mailing list manager software, but unfortunately, it doesn't translate to anything that lets you find the message in any archive. You can request a re-send of the message, as Neil says, which will work if the problem was transient. However, if the message was blocked by any filter (spam related?) between the list server and you, the resent version will get blocked the same way. As far as I can tell, the only way to get a reference to find the message in the archives is to send a message to an admin. I've been meaning to ask about this on the mlmmj mailing list, but have not yet done so. Jack
Re: [gentoo-user] How to find a bounced message
On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 16:39:13 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: > I got a bounced-message message yesterday, giving its number. How can I > find it? The Gentoo archives site doesn't include a search function, > nor message IDs. Send a mail to the List-Help address in the headers of any list message. It will send you a list of the commands you can use, including the one to retrieve a message by number. -- Neil Bothwick SITCOM: Single Income, Two Children, Oppressive Mortgage pgpQEi5c_wuGM.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-user] How to find a bounced message
Hello list, I got a bounced-message message yesterday, giving its number. How can I find it? The Gentoo archives site doesn't include a search function, nor message IDs. It was 197963 in case anyone knows what that was. -- Regards, Peter.
[gentoo-user] Contributing ebuild
Dear Gentoo Users! I would like to send my Technical documentations and programs. See attached files. Sincerely xbx. mariadb-connector-python-1.0.5.ebuild Description: Binary data
