On Sat, Jan 28, 2023 at 9:10 AM Jack
wrote:
>
> On 1/28/23 05:35, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Saturday, 28 January 2023 09:17:35 GMT Michael wrote:
> >
> >> Since my coding ability is even worse than Dale's I join him in kindly
> >> asking for a maintainer/dev to take it on and keep it running.
On Saturday, 28 January 2023 16:08:04 GMT Jack wrote:
> On 1/28/23 05:35, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Saturday, 28 January 2023 09:17:35 GMT Michael wrote:
> >> Since my coding ability is even worse than Dale's I join him in kindly
> >> asking for a maintainer/dev to take it on and keep it
Jack wrote:
> On 1/28/23 05:35, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> On Saturday, 28 January 2023 09:17:35 GMT Michael wrote:
>>
>>> Since my coding ability is even worse than Dale's I join him in kindly
>>> asking for a maintainer/dev to take it on and keep it running.
>> I too am finding it hard to imagine
On 1/28/23 05:35, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday, 28 January 2023 09:17:35 GMT Michael wrote:
Since my coding ability is even worse than Dale's I join him in kindly
asking for a maintainer/dev to take it on and keep it running.
I too am finding it hard to imagine life without gkrellm. I
On Friday, 27 January 2023 22:31:17 GMT Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2023 at 12:24:41 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
--->8
> > I've attached the reject files.
>
> Thanks for these! It looks like it'll probably be straightforward to
> amend the patch for 6.1.8. Are you currently
Wol wrote:
> LWN tipped off. If they run an article, we might get a new upstream.
>
> Cheers,
> Wol
>
> On 28/01/2023 06:20, Dale wrote:
>> Michał Górny wrote:
>>> # Michał Górny (2023-01-27)
>>> # GKrellM and a variety of plugins. It's unmaintained for some time.
>>> # Upstream homepage is
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 11:37:20 +, Michael wrote:
> haven't used conky for some years now, its development must have
> improved since. [...] Anyway,
> even after spending time configuring it to suit my requirements, I
> found gkrellms to be better in every respect.
Same here, which is why I
LWN tipped off. If they run an article, we might get a new upstream.
Cheers,
Wol
On 28/01/2023 06:20, Dale wrote:
Michał Górny wrote:
# Michał Górny (2023-01-27)
# GKrellM and a variety of plugins. It's unmaintained for some time.
# Upstream homepage is gone, and the whole suite is
On Saturday, 28 January 2023 11:12:26 GMT Dale wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Saturday, 28 January 2023 09:17:35 GMT Michael wrote:
> >> Since my coding ability is even worse than Dale's I join him in kindly
> >> asking for a maintainer/dev to take it on and keep it running.
> >
> > I too
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Saturday, 28 January 2023 09:17:35 GMT Michael wrote:
>
>> Since my coding ability is even worse than Dale's I join him in kindly
>> asking for a maintainer/dev to take it on and keep it running.
> I too am finding it hard to imagine life without gkrellm. I think it
On Saturday, 28 January 2023 09:17:35 GMT Michael wrote:
> Since my coding ability is even worse than Dale's I join him in kindly
> asking for a maintainer/dev to take it on and keep it running.
I too am finding it hard to imagine life without gkrellm. I think it needs more
than just a
On Saturday, 28 January 2023 08:05:47 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 00:20:03 -0600, Dale wrote:
> > Second, if no one takes it over, what could be used in its place? I'll
> > be honest, I don't know of anything that could replace it but I've never
> > thought about looking
On 2023-01-20, Dr Rainer Woitok wrote:
[...]
> Either these mail identification numbers should be somehow visible and
> in particular searchable at
>
>https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-user/
>
> or the mail that some mail couldn't be delivered should contain more in-
> formation like
On Sat, 28 Jan 2023 00:20:03 -0600, Dale wrote:
> Second, if no one takes it over, what could be used in its place? I'll
> be honest, I don't know of anything that could replace it but I've never
> thought about looking either. I'm looking into app-admin category but
> don't see anything
14 matches
Mail list logo
