UserDir
public_html in your config file.
Or just add -D PUBLIC_HTML to APACHE2_OPTS in /etc/conf.d/apache2.
Regards,
Christian
--
Christian Heim phreak at gentoo.org
GPG key ID: 9A9F68E6
Fingerprint: AEC4 87B8 32B8 4922 B3A9 DF79 CAE3 556F 9A9F 68E6
signature.asc
Description
,
Christian
--
Christian Heim phreak at gentoo.org
GPG key ID: 9A9F68E6
Fingerprint: AEC4 87B8 32B8 4922 B3A9 DF79 CAE3 556F 9A9F 68E6
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
On Tuesday 07 August 2007 15:12:51 Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hi!
Is it just me, or is http://packages.gentoo.org/ not available?
Alexander Skwar
It's being closed until further notice.
Regards,
Christian
--
Christian Heim phreak at gentoo.org
GPG key ID: 9A9F68E6
Fingerprint: AEC4 87B8
ebuild to a local overlay and bump the
version yourself.
*OR* you just download the tarball[1] of the old version yourself and place
it into your /usr/portage/distfiles/ directory.
[1]: http://ossavant.org/apache/spamassassin/
It should be fixed by now.
Regards,
Christian
--
Christian
).
TIA, Christian
--
Christian Heim phreak at gentoo.org
GPG key ID: 9A9F68E6
Fingerprint: AEC4 87B8 32B8 4922 B3A9 DF79 CAE3 556F 9A9F 68E6
Your friendly treecleaner/mobile/kernel/vserver/openvz monkey
pgpiFEF4m5t6t.pgp
Description: PGP signature
and for all normal default-linux/{amd64,x86} thats gentoo-sources. So just
emerge sys-kernel/vanilla-sources and it should be fine (since
vanilla-sources also provides virtual/linux-sources).
--
Christian Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux Developer - vserver/openvz
pgp2cdXh2BlDr.pgp
.
try this one:
grep -H GetChi *.C
--
Christian Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux Developer - vserver
pgpQgrDYB0qqv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
..
Stroller.
--
Christian Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux Developer - vserver
pgpD6pzWjV004.pgp
Description: PGP signature
on or off ...
--
Christian Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Linux Developer - vserver
pgpgn6cWu6FR5.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Mark Knecht wrote:
Hi,
One more question if I might. What does this message mean? I'm
guessing that a patch in my patch file has already been applied in
gentoo-sources? If so then it would seem that I'd want to skip it. Is
that correct? Skipping the patch would seem reasonable if that's
Mark Knecht wrote:
QUESTIONS:
1) Can I assume that whatever happened with the Hunk #x succeeded
that everything is OK? Maybe this was just a line number issue?
Yeah .. or and indent change or something similar.
2) What can I do about the Hunk #x FAILED messages?
Well to get that patch
Mark Knecht wrote:
On 7/7/05, Christian Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Christian,
Thanks for the response. There were just two problems, as best I
can tell. One was in the upper level makefile which the second was in
a more tecnical piece of code. I'm providing the output here more
On Sunday 24 April 2005 10:25, Ryutaro Yamashita ( RY )wrote:
[ ]
thanks for your help! :)
normally, in gentoo, does ALSA be implemented with ebuild, not with kernel?
As Hiam already said, the alsa-driver ebuilds are most times more recent than
the kernel-driver.
--
Never volunteer for
13 matches
Mail list logo