On 13/02/2017 04:42, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> Hi,
>
> got a mysterious error message this morning (still building a new
> root...)
>
> One of the updates was gnutls:
> It ends with:
> ...
> checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config...
> /usr/bin/i686-pc-linux
Hogren [17-02-13 17:06]:
> On 13/02/2017 04:42, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > got a mysterious error message this morning (still building a new
> > root...)
> >
> > One of the updates was gnutls:
> > It ends with:
> > ...
> &g
Hi,
got a mysterious error message this morning (still building a new
root...)
One of the updates was gnutls:
It ends with:
...
checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config...
/usr/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0...
/var/tmp/portage/net-libs/gnutls
Hogren [17-02-13 17:06]:
> On 13/02/2017 04:42, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > got a mysterious error message this morning (still building a new
> > root...)
> >
> > One of the updates was gnutls:
> > It ends with:
> > ...
> &g
t;
>>> One of the updates was gnutls:
>>> It ends with:
>>> ...
>>> checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config...
>>> /usr/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config
>>> checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0...
>>> /var/tmp/portage/net-libs/gnut
(still building a new
> >>> root...)
> >>>
> >>> One of the updates was gnutls:
> >>> It ends with:
> >>> ...
> >>> checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config...
> >>> /usr/bin/i686-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config
>
>>>>
>>>>> got a mysterious error message this morning (still building a new
>>>>> root...)
>>>>>
>>>>> One of the updates was gnutls:
>>>>> It ends with:
>>>>> ...
>>>>> checking for
3/02/2017 04:42, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> got a mysterious error message this morning (still building a new
> >>>>> root...)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> One of the updates was
like this.
> checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config... no
> checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
> checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
> checking for XKBFILE... configure: error: Package requirements
> (x11 kbproto) were not met:
>
> No package
Hi,
it doesn't matter that much, but I use pkgconf, it's a rewrite of pkg-config
which does some things better ( like determining what has to be linked into the
binary ) and works fine for me.
Regards,
Rasmus
Original Message
On 8 Jul 2017, 19:57, wrote:
&g
s?
Sorry, stupid question. gtk-config is specifically for the 1.2
version. pkg-config is for the new version:
pkg-config --cflags gtk+-2.0
pkg-config --libs gtk+-2.0
Somebody should have RTFM'ed me:
http://gtk.org/tutorial/sec-compiling.html
Thanks!
Matt
amp; emerge xorg-x11
This didn't solve the problem.
# emerge =x11-libs/libXt-1.0.2
Calculating dependencies... done!
>>> Emerging (1 of 1) x11-libs/libXt-1.0.2 to /
[...]
appending configuration tag "F77" to libtool
checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config... no
checking fo
h of linesbefore the error message are usually enough for those who know thisstuff. Something like this.
> checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config... no> checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config> checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes> checking for XKBFILE.
Hello.
I am writing an ebuild for bookmarkbridge
(bookmarkbridge.sf.net), which depends on qt-4.0.1.
configure (by means of pkg-config) is not findind
QtGui, although the file QtGui.pc is installed
(as /usr/lib64/qt4/QtGui.pc).
First of all, why QtGui.pc is not installed on a
standard location
I have two blockers and not sure which one to remove.
It seems to me they are contradicting each other.
[blocks B ] dev-util/pkgconf[pkg-config] ("dev-util/pkgconf[pkg-config]" is
blocking dev-util/pkgconfig-0.28-r2)
[blocks B ] dev-util/pkgconfig ("dev-util/pkgconfig&qu
gt;> Hogren [17-02-13 17:06]:
>>>>>> On 13/02/2017 04:42, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> got a mysterious error message this morning (still building a new
>>>>>>> root..
--
[...]
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for BLAS... configure: error: Package requirements (blas) were not met:
No package 'blas' found
Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you
installe
for glib-genmarshal... /usr/bin/glib-genmarshal
checking for gconftool-2... /usr/bin/gconftool-2
checking what warning flags to pass to the C compiler... -Wall
-Wmissing-prototypes
checking what language compliance flags to pass to the C compiler...
checking for i386-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config... no
LIBMPLIBDEP="/usr/$(get_libdir)/libmplib/mplib.la"
LDZZIPLIB="$(pkg-config --libs zziplib)" ZZIPLIBINC="$(pkg-config
--cflags zziplib)" LIBXPDFDEP="" LDLIBXPDF="$(pkg-config --libs
poppler)" LIBXPDFINCLUDE="$(pkg-config --cflags poppler)"
LIBXPDFCPP
namic linker characteristics... GNU/Linux ld.so
> (cached) (cached) checking how to hardcode library paths into
> programs... immediate
> checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes
> checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config... no
> checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
&g
Hi
I want to re-emerge firefox but it ends with this error message
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking for gtk+-2.0 >= 1.3.7... Package atk was not found in the
pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing
`atk.pc' to the PKG_CON
t; directory? Dunno where the real error is, but I'd start with the old
>> shotgun approach by running lafilefixer --justfixit and see if it helps.
>
> That was my first thought too. I ran lafixer and revdep-rebuild after
> emerging these and the error shown above came up.
gre
On 1/31/09, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
> I tried to emerge sonic-visualiser (1.4) and it fails to compile
>
> From the logfile (attached):
> Project MESSAGE: WARNING: Failed to find pkg-config package redland
> Project MESSAGE: Using pkg-config package rasqal with version 0.9.10
_gamin.so
> >> > /usr/bin: file not recognized: Is a directory
> >>
> >> Cool, a new libtool trick. It's trying to link an object file with a
> >> directory? Dunno where the real error is, but I'd start with the old
> >> shotgun approach
Hi,
I need webkitgtk-3.0.pc
I've used net-libs/webkit-gtk-1.4.0-r200 from the gnome overlay.
Unfortunately it installs only webkitgtk-1.0.pc (in /usr/lib64/
pkgconfig)
How to specify the name of the pkg-config file in an ebuild?
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut.
on
checking for python version... 2.7
checking for python platform... linux2
checking for python script directory...
${prefix}/lib64/python2.7/site-packages
checking for python extension module directory...
${exec_prefix}/lib64/python2.7/site-packages
checking for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config...
/usr/
essage:
>
> checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
> checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
> checking for XT... configure: error: Package requirements (sm x11
> xproto kbproto) were not met:
>
> No package 'x11' found
> No package 'kbp
_gamin.so
> >> > /usr/bin: file not recognized: Is a directory
> >>
> >> Cool, a new libtool trick. It's trying to link an object file with a
> >> directory? Dunno where the real error is, but I'd start with the old
> >> shotgun approach
evdep-rebuild) fails to build saying
> >
> > checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
> > checking for libwpd-0.8 ... Package libwpd-0.8 was not found in the
> > pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing
> > `libwpd-0.8.pc' to the
Hello,
Gentoo Humour Section strikes again, hitting me with a headshot, which
almost dropped me from my chair. This time it came with something
probably right out of Monty Python:
checking for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config... (cached) /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking pkg-config is at least version
Help?
It seems to be installing everything under /var/tmp/....
/var/db/pkg/dev-java/java-config-1.3.7/CONTENTS ===
hosting java_config # cat /var/db/pkg/dev-java/java-config-1.3.7/CONTENTS
dir /usr
dir /usr/lib
dir /usr/lib/python2.4
dir /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages
[snip]
d
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 10:21 AM, Arttu V. wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Gentoo Humour Section strikes again, hitting me with a headshot, which
> almost dropped me from my chair. This time it came with something
> probably right out of Monty Python:
>
> checking for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-
ly.
>
> I've done searches of Bugs, Forum & asked Google without much help.
>
> Can anyone suggest what might be causing this problem ?
As for libpng: the problem is that after libpng update many
pkg-config files still contain references to old libpng15.so.
Usual way to fix
for msgmerge... /usr/bin/msgmerge
checking for xgettext... /usr/bin/xgettext
checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config... no
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking pkg-config is at least version 0.9.0... yes
checking for backend libraries... checking for GST... yes
GStreamer-0
Hi, brand new system I am trying to install.
emerge gets to xorg-server-1.7.3.901-r1 and dies with the message that
the config script cannot find package gl. And it is true, if I issue
pkg-config --libs gl
I get, instead of the expected -IGL
Package gl was not found in the pkg-config search
"${COMMON_DEPEND}
nsplugin? ( || ( net-libs/xulrunner:1.8 net-libs/xulrunner:1.9
=www-client/seamonkey-1* )
>=dev-libs/nspr-4.6.6
>=dev-libs/nss-3.11-r1 )
And later we have this snippet:
pkg_setup() {
if use nsplugin; then
r a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p
> > checking for gawk... gawk
> > checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
> > checking how to create a ustar tar archive... gnutar
> > checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
> > checking for pkg-con
-config? It doesn't make much sense, does
it? In the libidn ebuild, I find:
inherit java-pkg
And that's what pulling in java-config. Is there a way to wrap the
inherit around some "if" statements, so that "inherit java-pkg" is
only "executed" when "java&
: No such file or directory
gottlieb@ajglap ~ $
There is no libxcb-aux now on my system nor is there an libxcb-atom,
which revdep rebuild mentioned.
openoffice (picked up by revdep-rebuild) fails to build saying
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking for libwpd-0.8 ... Package
errors
still occur
> There is no libxcb-aux now on my system nor is there an libxcb-atom,
> which revdep rebuild mentioned.
>
> openoffice (picked up by revdep-rebuild) fails to build saying
>
> checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
> checking for libwpd-0.8 ... Package
t java-config is not java so it
>> shouldn't be a big deal either.
>
> On the other hand, he has set USE=-java for libidn (at least), so
> why is it pulling in java-config? It doesn't make much sense, does
> it? In the libidn ebuild, I find:
>
> inherit java-p
#x27;s a hackish way I managed to put together,
---
# This is a hack to be able to dynamically determine which directories
# scons will try to create .scons* files in.
get_config() {
for lib in `grep "ParseConfig('pkg-config" SConstruct |
tr "'" ' &
SD-compatible install...
>>> /usr/lib/portage/python2.7/ebuild-helpers/xattr/install -c
>>> checking whether build environment is sane... yes
>>> checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p
>>> checking for gawk... gawk
>>> checking whether
s into programs... immediate
appending configuration tag "F77" to libtool
checking for ANSI C header files... (cached) yes
checking whether byte ordering is bigendian... no
checking for vasnprintf... no
checking for cos in -lm... yes
checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config... no
checking for p
direction
> to start trying to figure this out.
This isn't exactly portage determining the installed version of
gnome-icon-theme. It's the configure script of gnome-applets which is unaware
of the existance of portage checking the environment before the actual compile.
It uses the return
> in the first place? Why mangle uper/lower case characters in library
> file names?
>
> I guess that's why "autoconf" "configure" et al exists... But never
> tried to learn about them, so perhaps it's time now?
No, it's why pkg-config(1) et al exists
http://www.gnome.org/
> Description: Applets for the Gnome2 Desktop and Panel
> License: GPL-2 FDL-1.1
Al gnome2 based libs will use pkg-config, if you see gnome-config in
Makefile, most likely, it is referring to gnome1 stuffs.
So obviously, you need to the gnome applet libra
; system. The safest way to recreate it is probably to move the pkg
> directory elsewhere and then run "emerge -e @world".
>
Yep! I think that would be a polite way of putting it! ;)
> gcc is slotted, so emerging 4.9.4 will not touch your 5.4.0 installation,
> you use gcc-co
> My system is ~amd64.
> [SNIP]
>> > openoffice (picked up by revdep-rebuild) fails to build saying
>> >
>> > checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
>> > checking for libwpd-0.8 ... Package libwpd-0.8 was not found in the
>> > pkg-config search
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 12:27:47PM -0500, Penguin Lover Willie Wong squawked:
> Hi, brand new system I am trying to install.
>
> emerge gets to xorg-server-1.7.3.901-r1 and dies with the message that
> the config script cannot find package gl. And it is true, if I issue
>
>
is DEPRECATED. Use pkg-config instead.
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall -Wl,-O1 -Wl,--as-needed cxfe.o post.o
termio/getch2.o `xine-config --libs` -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lXext -lxine
-lncurses -lm -lXext \-lX11 -lX11 -o cxfe
xine-config is DEPRECATED. Use pkg-config instead.
cxfe.o: In function
HOME points to /root.
I'm not sure what you mean by "emerge --config output"? Running
`emerge --config` just gives:
# emerge --config nodejs
Configuring pkg...
Warning: ccache requested but no masquerade dircan be found in
/usr/lib*/ccache/bin
* pkg_config() is not defined: 'nodejs-8.11.1.ebuild'
--
Regards,
Christoph
little more
maintainable:
--- from /etc/make.conf --
PORTAGE_TMPDIR="/var/portage"
DISTDIR="${PORTAGE_TMPDIR}/distfiles"
PKGDIR="${PORTAGE_TMPDIR}/portage-pkg"
DISTCC_DIR="${PORTAGE_TMPDIR}/distcc"
KBUILD_OUTPUT="${PORTAGE_TMPDIR}/kernel"
ls for me - Big Ben sized bells.
Did you run java-config?
> NV_DEPEND: tcl? ( >=dev-lang/tcl-8.4 )
> java? ( >=virtual/jdk-1.4 )
>
> >=sys-devel/binutils-2.16.1 test? ( >=dev-lang/tcl-8.4 )
>
> java? ( >=dev-java/java-config-2.0.33-r1 >=sys-app
aemon-0.4.0-r1". the error found in the build
log is: cannot find -lpng12
i have both libpng-1.2.43-r1 and libpng-1.4.2 installed, but i do not
have libpng12.a in my /usr/lib64 directory. and 'pkg-config libpng
--libs' only show '-lpng14'.
This looks to me like a major p
that, some ideas:
(of course, yet limited to C and similar languages ;-o)
* libraries with (incompatible) interface changes should install
their headers under some own versioned prefix
* library imports should _always_ happen via pkg-config
(dont use .la files)
* pkg-config descriptors are ext
on an generic design for that, some ideas:
(of course, yet limited to C and similar languages ;-o)
* libraries with (incompatible) interface changes should install
their headers under some own versioned prefix
* library imports should _always_ happen via pkg-config
(dont use .la files)
* pkg-c
s are missing. Anyway the relevant
command from the configure script would be:
# pkg-config --exists firefox-xpcom
which returns false in your case. You'd be more interested in:
# pkg-config --exists --print-errors firefox-xpcom
though, as that prints a human readable error message. I bet `equ
ue to
> >> > problems in libxcb and others.
> >> >
> >> > My system is ~amd64.
> > [SNIP]
> >> > openoffice (picked up by revdep-rebuild) fails to build saying
> >> >
> >> > checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
> >>
Hi,
I just emerged bind and at the end I tried to set-up chroot
for it just as it is adviced in messages:
# emerge --config '=net-dns/bind-9.4.3_p2'
Configuring pkg...
*
* Setting up the chroot directory...mount: permission denied
Done.
Where can I
amd64 elibc_glibc kernel_linux multilib userland_GNU
!!! ERROR: Package ant-junit was not found!
* Unable to determine VM for building from dependencies:
NV_DEPEND: >=virtual/jdk-1.4
!dev-java/ant-tasks
!dev-java/ant-optional >=dev-java/java-config-2.1.9-r1
source? ( a
clone.
Assuming that disks are formatted, a stage3 has been freshly extracted,
bossman is installed, and the role/config files are on a mounted
filesystem, it should be similar to the role below:
file /etc/portage/make.conf root:root 644
! emerge-webrsync
! emerge --sync
file /e
ient, and on
> to a web-based thing.
>
>
> If you copied over /var/db/pkg you have a rather confused and messed up
> system. The safest way to recreate it is probably to move the pkg
> directory elsewhere and then run "emerge -e @world".
>
>
> Yep! I think
g.
>
>
> If you copied over /var/db/pkg you have a rather confused and
> messed up
> system. The safest way to recreate it is probably to move the pkg
> directory elsewhere and then run "emerge -e @world".
>
>
> Yep! I think that would be a poli
On 07/04/2010 06:38 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Hi folks,
> * library imports should _always_ happen via pkg-config
> (dont use .la files)
+1 (Am I allowed +100?)
ngs.h... yes
checking for inttypes.h... yes
checking for stdint.h... yes
checking for unistd.h... yes
checking for long int... yes
checking size of long int... 4
checking for i686-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config... no
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking pkg-config is at least versio
ust need java-config to point
> to various places to get other things to happen?
>
Yes, "java-config -L" will list every installed java vm. The actual portage
database for installed packages is located in /var/db/pkg.
Zac
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Mark Shields wrote:
I just emerged bind and at the end I tried to set-up chroot
for it just as it is adviced in messages:
# emerge --config '=net-dns/bind-9.4.3_p2'
Configuring pkg...
*
* Setting up the chroot directory...mount: permission denied
Done.
On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Jarry wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just emerged bind and at the end I tried to set-up chroot
> for it just as it is adviced in messages:
>
>
> # emerge --config '=net-dns/bind-9.4.3_p2'
> Configuring pkg...
> *
> *
case.
> Sometimes
> a little context which shows that there is nothing more of relevance is
> useful to make sure no error messages are missing. Anyway the relevant
> command from the configure script would be:
>
> # pkg-config --exists firefox-xpcom
>
> which re
On 7/4/2010 10:05 PM, walt wrote:
> On 07/04/2010 06:38 PM, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>
>> * library imports should _always_ happen via pkg-config
>> (dont use .la files)
>
> +1 (Am I allowed +100?)
If so, allow me to +1billion
On Friday 08 May 2009 18:10:10 Jarry wrote:
> Mark Shields wrote:
> >> I just emerged bind and at the end I tried to set-up chroot
> >> for it just as it is adviced in messages:
> >> --------
> >> # emerge --config '=net-dns/bind-9.4.3_p2'
ages installed.
Maybe stating the obvious here, but have you tried to remove and then install
gnome-icon-theme again?
" I've resynced and reemerged gnome-icon-theme with no success. "
Happy new year all !!!
Try :
"pkg-config gnome-icon-theme --modversion"
if th
r/lib/python2.4/optparse.py", line 707, in process
return self.take_action(
File "/usr/lib/python2.4/optparse.py", line 726, in take_action
self.callback(self, opt, value, parser, *args, **kwargs)
File "/usr/bin/depend-java-query", line 49, in get_vm
in FEATURES at the time of
>> emerging them. Doing this now by hand sounds kinda fatigue unless...
>> the output of --pretend was parsable so I do what I want by..
>>
>> for pkg in ${PKGS}; do quickpkg --include-config\=y $pkg; done
>>
>> or by something better?
>
FEATURES at the time of
emerging them. Doing this now by hand sounds kinda fatigue unless...
the output of --pretend was parsable so I do what I want by..
for pkg in ${PKGS}; do quickpkg --include-config\=y $pkg; done
or by something better?
Thanks for ideas in advance.
--
Fatih
!! ]
'modprobe x86_pkg_temp_thermal' says:
modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'x86_pkg_temp_thermal': No such device
'modinfo x86_pkg_temp_thermal'
filename:
/lib/modules/3.12.13-gentoo/kernel/drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.ko
license:GPL v2
author: Srin
080629 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Doesn't that give you a huge world file ...
No: of course, I 'emerge -1' when the pkg is not marked 'W/S' in my pkg.ref.
Currently, 'world' lists 97 pkgs ; pkg.ref lists 513 pkgs.
> ... and no easy way to identify redunda
a old (<4.0.24 ??) mysql start from here ]]]
quickpkg dev-db/mysql
cmd# emerge -av --buildpkg =mysql-4.0.25-r2
cmd# ebuild \
/var/db/pkg/dev-db/mysql-4.0.25-r2/mysql-4.0.25-r2.ebuild config
# Insert some kind of data fex attached "backup_mysql_4.0.sql.gz"
[[[ User with a recen
or a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p
checking for gawk... gawk
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking how to create a ustar tar archive... gnutar
checking whether to enable maintainer-specific portions of Makefiles... no
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking f
gparam
db2omf.help_dir "/usr/share/gnome/help" --stringparam
db2omf.omf_in"`pwd`/./evince.omf.in" `/usr/bin/pkg-config --variable
db2omf
gnome-doc-utils` C/evince.xml
xsltproc -o evince-bg.omf --stringparam db2omf.basename evince --stringparam
db2omf.format 'docbook' --
ot;, ...
emerge mysql does not do ebuild config.
the config step only needs to be carried out the very first time mysql
is emerged. Thats why the instructions that appear at the end of the
emerge say:
"You might want to run:
"ebuild /var/db/pkg/dev-db/mysql-4.0.24-r1/mysql-4.0.24-r1.e
ot.
I'm not sure what you mean by "emerge --config output"? Running
`emerge --config` just gives:
# emerge --config nodejs
Configuring pkg...
Warning: ccache requested but no masquerade dircan be found in
/usr/lib*/ccache/bin
* pkg_config() is not defined: 'nodejs-8.11.1.ebuild'
--
Regards,
Christoph
Jack
110328 Florian Philipp wrote:
> Am 27.03.2011 20:51, schrieb Philip Webb:
>> Wanting to try Firefox 4.0 , I tried to emerge Xulrunner 2.0
>> & ran into this problem :
>> root:527 profile> emerge xulrunner
>> checking for alsa... Package alsa was not found
e fail), I have accidentally copied over files that do not
> belong. My guess is a completely useless /var/db/pkg/* is confusing the
> hell out of portage/emerge.
If you copied over /var/db/pkg you have a rather confused and messed up
system. The safest way to recreate it is probably to move th
rnel/drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.ko
> license:GPL v2
> author: Srinivas Pandruvada
> description:X86 PKG TEMP Thermal Driver
> alias: x86cpu:vendor::family:*:model:*:feature:*00E6*
> depends:
> intree: Y
> vermagic: 3
uild /var/db/pkg/dev-db/mysql-4.1.14/mysql-4.1.14.ebuild config
phase must avoid "'" charachters and is not checked at all.
Just to be sure avoid [_%'] charachters (more to add?)
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Harry Putnam writes:
> I've never used autofs and am trying to get it setup.
>
> Following the debian wiki and an Ubuntu howto.
>
> I've installed the pkg:
>
> aptitude search ^autofs|grep ^i
> i autofs - kernel-based automoun
to build XML Security support... yes
checking whether to build LDAP configuration backend... no
checking which mozilla to use... external
checking which Mozilla flavour to use... Firefox
checking for firefox-xpcom ... Package firefox-firefox-nspr was not
found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps
have about 20 packages to unmerge or remerge with new use flags. But
> >> I want to keep binary copies (with old use settings) before unmerging
> >> them. Unfortunately I did not have buildpkg in FEATURES at the time of
> >> emerging them. Doing this now by hand sounds k
on2.7/ebuild-helpers/xattr/install -c
> checking whether build environment is sane... yes
> checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p
> checking for gawk... gawk
> checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
> checking how to create a ustar tar archive... gnutar
> chec
ng for a BSD-compatible install...
> /usr/lib/portage/python2.7/ebuild-helpers/xattr/install -c
> checking whether build environment is sane... yes
> checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... /bin/mkdir -p
> checking for gawk... gawk
> checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
> checki
When I update my
gentoo I get this message.
x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
-c -I. -I../../../include
-I../../../include/GL/internal -I../../../src/mesa/main
-I../../../src/mesa/glapi -I../../../src/mesa/drivers/dri/common
`pkg-config
--cflags libdrm` -I/usr/X11R6/include -Wall -O2 -fomit-frame
was parsable so I do what I want by..
>
> for pkg in ${PKGS}; do quickpkg --include-config\=y $pkg; done
>
> or by something better?
>
> Thanks for ideas in advance.
> --
>Fatih
Write a wrapper script around quickpkg and emerge.
And set buildpkg in FEATURES so this doesn't happen again :-)
--
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
the second computer, no update to these files was proposed.
>
>
> What is the output from
>
> emerge --info | grep CONFIG
>
> on both computers?
On the one that did the update:
CONFIG_PROTECT="/etc /usr/kde/2/share/config /usr/kde/3/share/config
/usr/share/config /
erly borked my system
> the moment I updated my kernel.
>
> Okay, the problem is where you mix user and system config in the same
> file, but this would have deleted lvm and mdadm from my boot config,
> rendering any kernel unbootable. :-(
>
> Like it tried to update postfix
ether x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc and cc understand -c and -o
together... yes
checking for glib-genmarshal... /usr/bin/glib-genmarshal
checking for glib-mkenums... /usr/bin/glib-mkenums
checking for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-pkg-config... no
checking for pkg-config... /usr/bin/pkg-config
checking pkg-con
r to build static libraries... no
> checking for library containing strerror... none required
> checking for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc... (cached) x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
> checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... (cached) yes
> checking whether x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc acc
ed) x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
> checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... (cached) yes
> checking whether x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc accepts -g... (cached) yes
> checking for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc option to accept ISO C89... (cached)
> none needed
> checking dependency style o
of things. Am I right in surmising that
> > I have all those old versions, and I just need java-config to point
> > to various places to get other things to happen?
> >
>
> Yes, "java-config -L" will list every installed java vm. The actual portage
> datab
1 - 100 of 355 matches
Mail list logo
