On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 21:15:05 +
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> (media-libs/libpng-1.6.8::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for merge)
> pulled in by (no parents that aren't satisfied by other packages in
> this slot)
Whenever you see this, "(no parents that ...)", you'll want to be aware
that there is back
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 11:54:43 +
Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 01:32:36AM +0100, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 22.02.2014 um 21:15
>
> > > What do I have to do to get this thing emerged?
>
> > > Thanks!
>
>
> > Sometimes it is helpful to increase the backtrack
On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 18:59:14 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> Personally, I think portage has gone too far and the complex solutions
> are causing problems that are worse than what they attempt to solve.
> Amzing solutions (like sub-slots) aren't really much use in the real
> world if the package mai
I remember having past a similar problem by this steps:
unmerge it.
try to update and write the offered package choices on corresponding files,
i.e: *.mask/use.
update it with "--newuse" option. Doesn't work, try first installing the
aforementioned package and then update.
It's actually not a bug,
On 2014-02-23 12:42 PM, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 23 Feb 2014 17:25:18 Tanstaafl wrote:
You do realize that blind bottom posting is far WORSE than blind
top-posting (done here intentionally to make a point), don't you?
Please trim your posts.
Sorry for this, I wasn't being lazy. I usually do t
On Sunday 23 Feb 2014 17:25:18 Tanstaafl wrote:
> Mick,
>
> You do realize that blind bottom posting is far WORSE than blind
> top-posting (done here intentionally to make a point), don't you?
>
> Please trim your posts.
Sorry for this, I wasn't being lazy. I usually do trim my posts, except f
Mick,
You do realize that blind bottom posting is far WORSE than blind
top-posting (done here intentionally to make a point), don't you?
Please trim your posts.
On 2014-02-22 6:32 PM, Mick wrote:
On Saturday 22 Feb 2014 22:06:15 Alan McKinnon wrote:
On 22/02/2014 23:15, Alan Mackenzie wrot
On 23/02/2014 18:13, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hello, Alan.
>
> On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 05:22:15PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On 23/02/2014 14:13, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
- are you sure that's an emerge failure and not just a convoluted info
> message? Perhaps post the entire emerge outpu
Hello, Alan.
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 05:22:15PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 23/02/2014 14:13, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> >> - are you sure that's an emerge failure and not just a convoluted info
> >> > message? Perhaps post the entire emerge output.
> > I tried it again without the -p, and got t
On 23/02/2014 14:13, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
>> - are you sure that's an emerge failure and not just a convoluted info
>> > message? Perhaps post the entire emerge output.
> I tried it again without the -p, and got the same output.
>
> I think this is a portage bug. At the very least, it's poor
> d
Hi, Mick.
On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 11:32:42PM +, Mick wrote:
> On Saturday 22 Feb 2014 22:06:15 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > On 22/02/2014 23:15, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > > Hi, Gentoo.
> > > I've just tried an emerge -puND world, after a shockingly long interval.
> > > I got the error message:
>
Hi, Alan.
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 12:06:15AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 22/02/2014 23:15, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > Hi, Gentoo.
> > I've just tried an emerge -puND world, after a shockingly long interval.
> > I got the error message:
> >!!! Multiple package instances within a single pa
On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 01:32:36AM +0100, waben...@gmail.com wrote:
> Am Samstag, 22.02.2014 um 21:15
> > What do I have to do to get this thing emerged?
> > Thanks!
> Sometimes it is helpful to increase the backtrack value. Some weeks ago
> I had a similar problem and could I solve it with
>
Am Samstag, 22.02.2014 um 21:15
schrieb Alan Mackenzie :
> Hi, Gentoo.
>
> I've just tried an emerge -puND world, after a shockingly long
> interval. I got the error message:
>
>!!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have
> been pulled !!! into the dependency graph, resu
On Saturday 22 Feb 2014 22:06:15 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 22/02/2014 23:15, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> > Hi, Gentoo.
> >
> > I've just tried an emerge -puND world, after a shockingly long interval.
> >
> > I got the error message:
> >!!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot h
On 22/02/2014 23:15, Alan Mackenzie wrote:
> Hi, Gentoo.
>
> I've just tried an emerge -puND world, after a shockingly long interval.
> I got the error message:
>
>!!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been
> pulled
>!!! into the dependency graph, resulting in
Hi, Gentoo.
I've just tried an emerge -puND world, after a shockingly long interval.
I got the error message:
!!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
!!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
, etc.
To simplify the problem, I tried t
17 matches
Mail list logo
