On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 14:32:36 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Fact is, there are a lot of people out there who hate systemd because
> > it's been successful, and it's been successful because it sticks to
> > the nix philosophy of "do one thing, and do it well".
>
> ...but not the other *nix
On Mon, 11 Nov 2019 06:54:31 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
> > > It was obviously a semi-trollish comment.
> > >
> > Now that's harsh! Although yes I'm sure he was tweaking tails - hence
> > the "tongue in cheek" smiley.
>
> I didn't intend to suggest that I thought it was mean-spirited. Just
On Monday, 11 November 2019 10:38:50 GMT Wols Lists wrote:
> Fact is, there are a lot of people out there who hate systemd because
> it's been successful, and it's been successful because it sticks to the
> nix philosophy of "do one thing, and do it well".
...but not the other *nix tradition of
On 11/11/19 11:54, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 5:38 AM Wols Lists wrote:
>>
>> On 09/11/19 19:51, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>>
>>> Only if somebody has created a generator for openrc, which I doubt.
>>> It was obviously a semi-trollish comment.
>>>
>> Now that's harsh! Although yes
On Monday, 11 November 2019 11:54:31 GMT Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 5:38 AM Wols Lists wrote:
>
> > Fact is, there are a lot of people out there who hate systemd because
> > it's been successful, and it's been successful because it sticks to the
> > nix philosophy of "do one
On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 5:38 AM Wols Lists wrote:
>
> On 09/11/19 19:51, Rich Freeman wrote:
> >
> > Only if somebody has created a generator for openrc, which I doubt.
> > It was obviously a semi-trollish comment.
> >
> Now that's harsh! Although yes I'm sure he was tweaking tails - hence
> the
On 09/11/19 19:51, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 7:01 AM J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>
>> On 9 November 2019 11:42:38 CET, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>> On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 21:03:13 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>>>
I had a similar issue and ended up checking every init-script, conf.d
On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 7:01 AM J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
> On 9 November 2019 11:42:38 CET, Neil Bothwick wrote:
> >On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 21:03:13 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> >
> >> I had a similar issue and ended up checking every init-script, conf.d
> >> file and rc.conf entry and making a
On 9 November 2019 11:42:38 CET, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 21:03:13 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
>
>> I had a similar issue and ended up checking every init-script, conf.d
>> file and rc.conf entry and making a dependency-tree manually on a big
>> white-board.
>>
>> I haven't found
On Fri, 08 Nov 2019 21:03:13 +0100, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> I had a similar issue and ended up checking every init-script, conf.d
> file and rc.conf entry and making a dependency-tree manually on a big
> white-board.
>
> I haven't found a tool that does this automatically yet.
systemd's systemctl
On 9/11/19 4:03 am, J. Roeleveld wrote:
> On Thursday, November 7, 2019 4:06:10 PM CET Daniel Frey wrote:
>> On 2019-11-07 04:37, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
>>> I have run into some problems creating openrc initscripts for moosefs -
>>> is there something that will display the start order/dependency
On Thursday, November 7, 2019 1:37:21 PM CET Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> I have run into some problems creating openrc initscripts for moosefs -
> is there something that will display the start order/dependency tree?
> Text or graphical doesn't matter.
>
> Bill K.
The closest to this is:
On Thursday, November 7, 2019 4:06:10 PM CET Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 2019-11-07 04:37, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
> > I have run into some problems creating openrc initscripts for moosefs -
> > is there something that will display the start order/dependency tree?
> > Text or graphical doesn't matter.
>
On 2019-11-07 04:37, Bill Kenworthy wrote:
I have run into some problems creating openrc initscripts for moosefs -
is there something that will display the start order/dependency tree?
Text or graphical doesn't matter.
Bill K.
rc-status does try to resolve dependencies and list them in
14 matches
Mail list logo
