Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Qt 4 programs segfault on startup

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Gille wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >> >>Peter Gille wrote: >> >>Hello list, >> >>All of the programs on m

[gentoo-user] Re: Qt 4 programs segfault on startup

Peter Gille wrote: On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Peter Gille wrote: Hello list, All of the programs on my computer using qt4 segfaults on startup. Did you try revdep-rebuild? Yes. The onl

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Qt 4 programs segfault on startup

On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 1:02 AM, Nikos Chantziaras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Gille wrote: > >> Hello list, >> >> All of the programs on my computer using qt4 segfaults on startup. >> > > Did you try revdep-rebuild? > > > Yes. The only broken binaries I have are from virtualbox, which shou

[gentoo-user] Re: Qt 4 programs segfault on startup

Peter Gille wrote: Hello list, All of the programs on my computer using qt4 segfaults on startup. Did you try revdep-rebuild?

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: QT 4

On 17 March 2006 18:48, James wrote: > Hello Uwe, > > So when will we see KDE-4? My personal opinion? At the earliest end of this year - but honestly, I doubt it. More probably, there will be a a "developer alpha" or some such by the end of 2006. One with a stabilised API but not necessarily fe

[gentoo-user] Re: QT 4

Uwe Thiem iway.na> writes: > > Just out of interest how far along is qt4? Last time I looked the next > > major release of kde *might* be using it, if it becomes stable in time. Is > > this still the case? > The current version is Qt-4.1.1 AFAIK and it's pretty stable. > KDE4 will be based on

[gentoo-user] Re: QT 4

Bo Andresen gmail.com> writes: > Slotted means that several versions of a package can coexist at the same > system. In the case of qt version 3 goes into /usr/qt/3 and version 4 goes > into /usr/qt/4. > > how do I determine when a packages is slotted, and where do I read > > more about 'slott

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: QT 4

On Thursday 16 March 2006 23:03, James wrote: > Dmitry S. Makovey athabascau.ca> writes: > > since packages you use (I assume KDE etc.) are not using qt4 (i.e. > > require specifically qt3 branch) portage doesn't find any reasons to > > bump version of qt. AFAIR Qt is a slotted package and you can

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: QT 4

Dmitry S. Makovey schreef: > there are quite a few "slotted" packages in portage so you might bump > into this every now and then (KDE is slotted AFAIR). Even easier-- so are kernel sources. Install a new one, and it's always going to be [ NS ], not [ U ] . Looking at how kernel sources are hand

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: QT 4

On Thursday 16 March 2006 23:43, Shawn Haggett wrote: > Although I don't know why portage doesn't also want to install the 4.1.1 > version of qt if they are slotted... That's because qt is neither in the world file or a depency of any package which is in the world file. It wants to upgrade to new

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: QT 4

On Thursday 16 March 2006 15:03, James wrote: > Dmitry S. Makovey athabascau.ca> writes: > > since packages you use (I assume KDE etc.) are not using qt4 > > (i.e. require specifically qt3 branch) portage doesn't find any > > reasons to bump version of qt. AFAIR Qt is a slotted package and > > you

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: QT 4

James wrote: > Dmitry S. Makovey athabascau.ca> writes: > >> since packages you use (I assume KDE etc.) are not using qt4 (i.e. >> require specifically qt3 branch) portage doesn't find any reasons to >> bump version of qt. AFAIR Qt is a slotted package and you can safely >> go ahead and do >>

[gentoo-user] Re: QT 4

Dmitry S. Makovey athabascau.ca> writes: > since packages you use (I assume KDE etc.) are not using qt4 (i.e. > require specifically qt3 branch) portage doesn't find any reasons to > bump version of qt. AFAIR Qt is a slotted package and you can safely > go ahead and do > emerge =x11-libs/qt-4