On 2012-05-19 8:09 AM, Pandu Poluan pa...@poluan.info wrote:
But stay away from OpenDNS like the plague. They are known to perform
false resolve, especially if the domain being resolved does not exist.
Simple to disable, been using OpenDNS for many years, no problems
whatsoever...
On Sun, 20 May 2012 06:15:42 +0530
Nilesh Govindrajan cont...@nileshgr.com wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 19 May 2012 07:45:56 +0530
Nilesh Govindrajan cont...@nileshgr.com wrote:
Hi,
Which is the best caching dns
On Saturday 19 May 2012 13:09:45 Pandu Poluan wrote:
On May 19, 2012 6:46 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Willie Matthews wrote:
[le snip]
You should really try changing you DNS server to some faster ones. I
was having this same problem with my ISP or DSL modem with built in
On May 21, 2012 3:19 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Saturday 19 May 2012 13:09:45 Pandu Poluan wrote:
On May 19, 2012 6:46 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Willie Matthews wrote:
[le snip]
You should really try changing you DNS server to some faster ones. *
I*
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Slow connection. See my previous reply to the list. I'm using pdnsd,
which can persist records and has every damn feature I wanted.
Fair enough, but consider this:
If your connection is slow, the only thing you
On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Nilesh Govindrajan
cont...@nileshgr.com wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:17 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Slow connection. See my previous reply to the list. I'm using pdnsd,
which can persist records and has every damn feature I wanted.
Which is the best caching dns server? I'm presently using pdns-recursor,
which is quite good, but doesn't have option to set minimum ttl (doesn't
make sense, but some sites like twitter have ridiculously low ttl of 30s).
The load balancing technology will be slow to respond if the TTLs are
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com wrote:
Which is the best caching dns server? I'm presently using pdns-recursor,
which is quite good, but doesn't have option to set minimum ttl (doesn't
make sense, but some sites like twitter have ridiculously low ttl of 30s).
On 05/19/12 04:13, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com wrote:
Which is the best caching dns server? I'm presently using pdns-recursor,
which is quite good, but doesn't have option to set minimum ttl (doesn't
make sense, but some sites
Willie Matthews wrote:
On 05/19/12 04:13, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com wrote:
Which is the best caching dns server? I'm presently using pdns-recursor,
which is quite good, but doesn't have option to set minimum ttl (doesn't
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Willie Matthews
matthews.wil...@gmail.com wrote:
On 05/19/12 04:13, Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Adam Carter adamcart...@gmail.com wrote:
Which is the best caching dns server? I'm presently using pdns-recursor,
which is quite
On May 19, 2012 6:46 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Willie Matthews wrote:
[le snip]
You should really try changing you DNS server to some faster ones. I was
having this same problem with my ISP or DSL modem with built in router
taking a long time. I changed my DNS servers to
On Sat, 19 May 2012 07:45:56 +0530
Nilesh Govindrajan cont...@nileshgr.com wrote:
Hi,
Which is the best caching dns server? I'm presently using
pdns-recursor, which is quite good, but doesn't have option to set
minimum ttl (doesn't make sense, but some sites like twitter have
ridiculously
On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 10:06 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, 19 May 2012 07:45:56 +0530
Nilesh Govindrajan cont...@nileshgr.com wrote:
Hi,
Which is the best caching dns server? I'm presently using
pdns-recursor, which is quite good, but doesn't have option to set
Hi,
Which is the best caching dns server? I'm presently using pdns-recursor,
which is quite good, but doesn't have option to set minimum ttl (doesn't
make sense, but some sites like twitter have ridiculously low ttl of 30s).
Also, it isn't able to save cached entries to file so that it can be
15 matches
Mail list logo
