Re: [gentoo-user] Blocks with xz-utils lzma-utils

2009-12-18 Thread Helmut Jarausch
On 17 Dec, Dale wrote: I'm trying to get KDE 4 where I can use it so I used the layman to get the latest. Anyway, I seem to have ran into a Block, may not be related to KDE4 tho, that I just can't make sense of. This is the error I get: [blocks b ] kde-base/kde-meta:4.3[-kdeprefix]

Re: [gentoo-user] Blocks with xz-utils lzma-utils

2009-12-18 Thread Paul Hartman
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 3:12 AM, Helmut Jarausch jarau...@igpm.rwth-aachen.de wrote: I had a similar problem since I wanted to use the -J option of tar (telling it to use the xz compressor) There's also a --use-compress-prog switch for tar so you can make it use any program you like. (unless

Re: [gentoo-user] Blocks with xz-utils lzma-utils

2009-12-18 Thread Dale
Neil Bothwick wrote: On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:12:19 -0600, Dale wrote: You are both right. I tried installing a later version on the blockers but not the packages that depended on them. So, I added the following to my package.keyword and package.unmask files: =app-portage/eix-0.18.3

Re: [gentoo-user] Blocks with xz-utils lzma-utils

2009-12-18 Thread Dale
Well, this ain't working as well as I would like. I'm getting a lot of failures. Something like this: * subversion check out start -- * repository: svn://anonsvn.kde.org/home/kde/trunk/KDE/kdesdk svn: Network connection closed unexpectedly * ERROR: kde-base/kate- failed: *

Re: [gentoo-user] Blocks with xz-utils lzma-utils

2009-12-18 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:44:41 -0600, Dale wrote: How did this end up in the lzma/xz thread? Well, this ain't working as well as I would like. I'm getting a lot of failures. Something like this: * subversion check out start -- * repository:

Re: [gentoo-user] Blocks with xz-utils lzma-utils

2009-12-18 Thread Dale
Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 10:44:41 -0600, Dale wrote: How did this end up in the lzma/xz thread? Well, this ain't working as well as I would like. I'm getting a lot of failures. Something like this: * subversion check out start -- * repository:

Re: [gentoo-user] Blocks with xz-utils lzma-utils

2009-12-18 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:35:20 -0600, Dale wrote: I may just go back to a more stable setup. Like the standard KDE 4 in portage? Which doesn't do what I need for it to be usable? Like? I only switched to 4 recently, but I'm quite happy with it in the main. Oh well. I

Re: [gentoo-user] Blocks with xz-utils lzma-utils

2009-12-18 Thread Dale
Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:35:20 -0600, Dale wrote: I may just go back to a more stable setup. Like the standard KDE 4 in portage? Which doesn't do what I need for it to be usable? Like? I only switched to 4 recently, but I'm quite happy

[gentoo-user] Blocks with xz-utils lzma-utils

2009-12-17 Thread Dale
I'm trying to get KDE 4 where I can use it so I used the layman to get the latest. Anyway, I seem to have ran into a Block, may not be related to KDE4 tho, that I just can't make sense of. This is the error I get: [blocks b ] kde-base/kde-meta:4.3[-kdeprefix]

Re: [gentoo-user] Blocks with xz-utils lzma-utils

2009-12-17 Thread Paul Hartman
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to get KDE 4 where I can use it so I used the layman to get the latest. Anyway, I seem to have ran into a Block, may not be related to KDE4 tho, that I just can't make sense of. This is the error I get: [blocks b

Re: [gentoo-user] Blocks with xz-utils lzma-utils

2009-12-17 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:55:06 -0600, Dale wrote: I didn't post the whole thing but the part about the Blocks with a capital B. I have unmerged both lzma-utils and xz-utils but I still get this error. How can they block it when they are not installed yet? I'm missing something here. I just

Re: [gentoo-user] Blocks with xz-utils lzma-utils

2009-12-17 Thread Dale
Paul Hartman wrote: On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to get KDE 4 where I can use it so I used the layman to get the latest. Anyway, I seem to have ran into a Block, may not be related to KDE4 tho, that I just can't make sense of. This is the

Re: [gentoo-user] Blocks with xz-utils lzma-utils

2009-12-17 Thread Dale
Neil Bothwick wrote: On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:55:06 -0600, Dale wrote: I didn't post the whole thing but the part about the Blocks with a capital B. I have unmerged both lzma-utils and xz-utils but I still get this error. How can they block it when they are not installed yet? I'm missing

Re: [gentoo-user] Blocks with xz-utils lzma-utils

2009-12-17 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Donnerstag 17 Dezember 2009 19:32:54 schrieb Dale: I have tried a few things but just to make sure, I tried this just to be sure. I unmerged both blockers and emerged xz-utils again, same block as before. Ideas? The solution is in the ebuilds (as always): eix 0.17.0 still depends on

Re: [gentoo-user] Blocks with xz-utils lzma-utils

2009-12-17 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
Dale schrieb am 17.12.2009 16:55: [blocks b ] kde-base/kde-meta:4.3[-kdeprefix] (kde-base/kde-meta:4.3[-kdeprefix] is blocking kde-base/kde-meta-) [blocks B ] app-arch/lzma-utils (app-arch/lzma-utils is blocking app-arch/xz-utils-) [blocks B ] app-arch/xz-utils

Re: [gentoo-user] Blocks with xz-utils lzma-utils

2009-12-17 Thread Dale
Daniel Pielmeier wrote: Dale schrieb am 17.12.2009 16:55: [blocks b ] kde-base/kde-meta:4.3[-kdeprefix] (kde-base/kde-meta:4.3[-kdeprefix] is blocking kde-base/kde-meta-) [blocks B ] app-arch/lzma-utils (app-arch/lzma-utils is blocking app-arch/xz-utils-) [blocks B ]

Re: [gentoo-user] Blocks with xz-utils lzma-utils

2009-12-17 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 15:12:19 -0600, Dale wrote: You are both right. I tried installing a later version on the blockers but not the packages that depended on them. So, I added the following to my package.keyword and package.unmask files: =app-portage/eix-0.18.3