Am Donnerstag, 12. Juni 2008 schrieb ext Nicolai Beuermann:
> You are right it´s not a real solution. Only a solution to get back the
> old (and working) system with two installed versions of glibc in package
> database.
So emerge -ep world shows it would re-install 2.3.4.
> > > > quickpkg glibc-
Am Donnerstag, 12. Juni 2008 schrieb ext Dimitrios Ropokis:
> This is not a real solution,
Yes, it is.
> a problem has to be solved with tools that gentoo offers,
Oh, didn't know emerge is not a Gentoo tool. Sorry.
> In my mind no,
> because the installed system must be ready to help itself!
You are right it´s not a real solution. Only a solution to get back the old
(and working) system with two installed versions of glibc in package
database.
thanks
Am Donnerstag 12 Juni 2008 schrieb Dimitrios Ropokis:
> This is not a real solution,
> a problem has to be solved with tools that gent
This is not a real solution,
a problem has to be solved with tools that gentoo offers,
is the livecd solution?
In my mind no,
because the installed system must be ready to help itself!
Στις 12-06-2008, ημέρα Πεμ, και ώρα 14:50 +0200, ο/η Nicolai Beuermann
έγραψε:
> Am Donnerstag 12 Juni 2008 schri
Am Donnerstag 12 Juni 2008 schrieb Dirk Heinrichs:
> Hi,
>
> I guess the best way to finally solve this would be to
>
> quickpkg glibc-2.3.4 (just in case...)
> emerge -C glib-2.3.4
you mean to unmerge glibc-2.3.4?
When I do this my system is no longer useable. emerge wouldn´t work.
Marvelously i´
Hi,
I guess the best way to finally solve this would be to
quickpkg glibc-2.3.4 (just in case...)
emerge -C glib-2.3.4
emerge -e world (or at least "system" if world is too much)
HTH...
Dirk
--
Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408
Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)
Am Dienstag 10 Juni 2008 schrieb Enrico Weigelt:
> IMHO, you've removed exactly that libc (or at least it's dynamic
> linker) your binaries are built against, so they can't be executed
> anymore - you'r system is unbootable.
>
> ldd output on these binaries should give your more enlightenment.
* Nicolai Beuermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unmerging the old glibc ends up in an error about commands are
> no longer found. Back at the prompt I can´t fire any command.
> Nothing was found. Even shutdown failed.
When you're trying to run some binary (which definitively exists
and is +
* Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The definitive way to find out exactly what is going on is to run emerge
> with the -t option and see from that what is pulling a package in.
Is there any way to let emerge assume certain package is not
installed (w/o tweaking /var/db/pkg) ?
This wo
>Nicolai Beuermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit:
>
>> Again
>> the result was an unbootable system.
>
>What is the error exactly ?
>
I cannot remember the exact words right now - when i´m back home i´ll consult
the log
Nicolai Beuermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit:
> Again
> the result was an unbootable system.
What is the error exactly ?
--
Nicolas Sebrecht
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On 09.06.2008 19:10:53, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Monday 09 June 2008, Nicolai Beuermann wrote:
> > After I'd reemerged listed packages the equery command from above
> > still lists the dependencies.
> >
> > what goes wrong?
> The definitive way to find out exactly what is going on is to run emerg
On Monday 09 June 2008, Nicolai Beuermann wrote:
> After I'd reemerged listed packages the equery command from above
> still lists the dependencies.
>
> what goes wrong?
equery depends is not accurate.
It does not list packages that are definitely dependencies, it lists
dependencies that might p
On 09.06.2008 14:10:00, Dirk Heinrichs wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 8. Juni 2008 schrieb Nicolai Beuermann:
> > Basic question: Why do I need two versions of glibc?
>
> You don't.
>
> > equery depends =sys-libs/glibc-2.6.1 lists about 30 entries
> > equery depends =sys-libs/glibc-2.3.4.20040808-r1 lists 27
Am Sonntag, 8. Juni 2008 schrieb Nicolai Beuermann:
> Basic question: Why do I need two versions of glibc?
You don't.
> equery depends =sys-libs/glibc-2.6.1 lists about 30 entries
> equery depends =sys-libs/glibc-2.3.4.20040808-r1 lists 27 entries of which
> some are the same some are different.
Basic question: Why do I need two versions of glibc?
The background:
After cleaning up non-sys stuff with help of eix-test-obsolete it now shows
Installed packages with a version not in the database (or masked):
[D] sys-libs/glibc (2.3.4.20040808-r1(i686-pc-linux-gnu-2.2)@08.11.2007 2.6.1
(2.2)@2
16 matches
Mail list logo
