Calvin Spealman wrote:
Simply put, the list just works. And it works because we have all agreed on
how we're going to make it work. If you want to be part of the process and
want to live under the established standard that we're all happy with, fine
and welcome.
So you say both follow
Holly Bostick wrote:
Calvin Spealman schreef:
On 5/9/05, Dave Nebinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You're looking at years worth of standards that have been built up and
saying after all of that time they need to be changed.
Yeah, things change.
Two words: the wheel.
Holly
Holly,
On Sat, 7 May 2005 16:56:09 +, Calvin Spealman wrote:
If the mailers follow the proper multipart protocols and also make it
easy to hide quoted emails, move to see the original ones, etc (to add
incentives to use the protocol), then support for it can grow until
everyone will have updated
If the mailers follow the proper multipart protocols and also make it
easy to hide quoted emails, move to see the original ones, etc (to add
incentives to use the protocol), then support for it can grow until
everyone will have updated just over time. once you know someone's
reader has
The replies would include instructions for which sections of the
original messages to quote.
On 5/9/05, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 7 May 2005 16:56:09 +, Calvin Spealman wrote:
If the mailers follow the proper multipart protocols and also make it
easy to hide quoted
On Mon, 9 May 2005 10:38:39 -0400, Calvin Spealman wrote:
The replies would include instructions for which sections of the
original messages to quote.
From where would it get those instructions when the person proposing the
method can't even place his replies in context?
--
Neil Bothwick
If the mailers follow the proper multipart protocols and also make it
easy to hide quoted emails, move to see the original ones, etc (to add
incentives to use the protocol), then support for it can grow until
everyone will have updated just over time. once you know someone's
reader has support for
7 matches
Mail list logo
