On 4/1/24 15:53, Hoël Bézier wrote:
Hi,
Am Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 03:19:27PM +0200 schrieb n952162:
How do you see that radicale is marked for testing?
[snip]
The actual error mesg:
/ !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "radicale" have been masked.//
// !!! One of the following masked
Am Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 03:53:19PM +0200 schrieb Hoël Bézier:
That’s a different thing than masking a package using a package.mask file,
where the package is technically available for your architecture but someone
(usually you or the gentoo developpers) decided it wasn’t fit to be installed:
for
Hi,
Am Mon, Apr 01, 2024 at 03:19:27PM +0200 schrieb n952162:
How do you see that radicale is marked for testing?
[snip]
The actual error mesg:
/ !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "radicale" have been masked.//
// !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete
you
On 3/29/24 21:09, Jack wrote:
I see www-apps/radicale-3.1.8 marked as testing, but not masked. The
place to look for masking reasons is
/usr/portage/profiles/package.mask (or wherever your portage tree lives.)
However, if I search for radicale, I only see the one package, and the
associated acc
On 2024.03.29 15:53, n952162 wrote:
I'd like to emerge *radicale*, but see it's masked for amd, etc. I
looked at the portage meta data and the ebuild to see if I could find
out why it should be masked - it's just a python program, supposedly.
But I can't find out anything. This warnings are un
Hello.
I'd like to emerge *radicale*, but see it's masked for amd, etc. I
looked at the portage meta data and the ebuild to see if I could find
out why it should be masked - it's just a python program, supposedly.
But I can't find out anything. This warnings are unequivocal about
unmasking a p
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 2:06 PM, Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> How can you have a masked package installed but have not unmasked it?
By setting the ACCEPT_KEYWORDS flag in the command line when emerging?
Haven't done that for a while though, so I wouldn't know if
ACCEPT_KEYWORDS ha
On Wednesday 14 May 2008, Daniel Mendler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a lot of masked packages installed on my system. The packages
> are installed but not unmasked. Is there an easy way to find those
> packages?
How can you have a masked package installed but have not unmasked it?
To find all sorts
Daniel Mendler schrieb:
Hi,
I have a lot of masked packages installed on my system. The packages
are installed but not unmasked. Is there an easy way to find those
packages?
Daniel
See this
http://gentoo-wiki.com/Keywords
http://gentoo-wiki.com/TIP_Regenerate_package_keywords
Both tips c
cc:
Asunto: [gentoo-user] Masked Packages
Hi,
I have a lot of masked packages installed on my system. The packages are
installed but not unmasked. Is there an easy way to find those packages?
Daniel
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Hi,
I have a lot of masked packages installed on my system. The packages are
installed but not unmasked. Is there an easy way to find those packages?
Daniel
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
Johannes Skov Frandsen wrote:
> echo "dev-php5/phpunit-3.0.5 ~x86" >> /etc/portage/package.keywords
> emerge -av dev-php5/phpunit
> ..
> Invalid atom in /etc/portage/package.keywords: dev-php5/phpunit-3.0.5
You used the version number of the package, and that why portage complains.
The right lin
Johannes Skov Frandsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I posted a question yesterday about masked packages and got a lot of
> answers on how to use it, but didn't really needed it for the task I was
> trying to accomplish. Now however i fear there is no way around it.
>
> After reading trough the different posts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Etaoin Shrdlu said the following on 2007-04-13 12:28:
> Just put the name of the package without the version number:
>
> echo "dev-php5/phpunit ~x86" >> /etc/portage/package.keywords
...or put = before the specific version, as in
echo "=dev-php5/php
2007/4/13, Johannes Skov Frandsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Hi,
I posted a question yesterday about masked packages and got a lot of
answers on how to use it, but didn't really needed it for the task I was
trying to accomplish. Now however i fear
On Friday 13 April 2007 11:47, Johannes Skov Frandsen wrote:
> My problem is that emerge still ain't to happy... it prints out:
>
> Invalid atom in /etc/portage/package.keywords: dev-php5/phpunit-3.0.5
Just put the name of the package without the version number:
echo "dev-php5/phpunit ~x86" >> /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
I posted a question yesterday about masked packages and got a lot of
answers on how to use it, but didn't really needed it for the task I was
trying to accomplish. Now however i fear there is no way around it.
After reading trough the different po
On Sun, 21 May 2006 10:11:55 -0400, Daniel D Jones wrote:
> For more information, see MASKED PACKAGES section in the emerge man
> page or refer to the Gentoo Handbook.
> !!!(dependency required by "gnome-base/gnome-vfs-2.14.1" [ebuild])
>
> !!! Problem resolving dependencies for net-misc/unis
Jonathan Chocron wrote:
>Le Dimanche 21 Mai 2006 16:11, Daniel D Jones a écrit :
>
>
>>I get the following error:
>>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/db/pkg # emerge -uDvat world
>>
>>These are the packages that I would merge, in reverse order:
>>
>>Calculating world dependencies -
>>!!! All ebuilds tha
Le Dimanche 21 Mai 2006 16:11, Daniel D Jones a écrit :
> I get the following error:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/db/pkg # emerge -uDvat world
>
> These are the packages that I would merge, in reverse order:
>
> Calculating world dependencies -
> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=net-misc/neon-0.
I get the following error:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/db/pkg # emerge -uDvat world
These are the packages that I would merge, in reverse order:
Calculating world dependencies -
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy ">=net-misc/neon-0.25.3" have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is r
21 matches
Mail list logo
