On 2014-02-06, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On 5 February 2014 15:58:22 CET, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2014-02-05, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On 4 February 2014 22:27:03 CET, Grant Edwards
grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Are the VLAN
On 6 February 2014 15:31:58 CET, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2014-02-06, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On 5 February 2014 15:58:22 CET, Grant Edwards
grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2014-02-05, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On 4 February 2014 22:27:03
On 2014-02-06, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
If the switch supports bonding, use that as well. I have 4 interfaces
in a single bond. On that bond I have the vlans configured.
Helps with the throughput as I have multiple machines pulling data
from there connected to the same switch.
On 2014-02-05, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On 4 February 2014 22:27:03 CET, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com
wrote:
Are the VLAN configuration docs up to date?
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=4chap=3#doc_chap10
The reason I ask is that the Gentoo
On 5 February 2014 15:58:22 CET, Grant Edwards grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 2014-02-05, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org wrote:
On 4 February 2014 22:27:03 CET, Grant Edwards
grant.b.edwa...@gmail.com wrote:
Are the VLAN configuration docs up to date?
5 matches
Mail list logo