On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 07:01:47AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 2011-06-05 11:44 PM, Indi wrote:
I see what you mean about the default config, LOL.
Been trying to change the font sizes used for the message list and
folder pane, but no success yet. Makes it a bit hard to see things but
other
On 2011-06-06 7:19 AM, Indi wrote:
Anyone can point to a google search, smartass. :)
I've been called worse... ;)
Of course, the search turns up nothing that works for tbird3.
It doesn't state specifically, but the very first hit works fine for
3.1.10 for me...
Do you *really* imagine I'd
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:13:31AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
As to your last - yes, I'm on Windows (as I stated before) - but nothing
says this hack only works on Windows...
It doesn't work in linux.
It was the first thing I tried.
***[Snip all the rest of the advice that doesn't work in
On 6/6/2011 5:36 AM, Indi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 08:13:31AM -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
As to your last - yes, I'm on Windows (as I stated before) - but nothing
says this hack only works on Windows...
It doesn't work in linux.
It was the first thing I tried.
***[Snip all the rest of
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 09:42:01AM -0700, kashani wrote:
I'd like to point out that the PEBCAK was on your end.
Sorry, no.
And you just used your one shot at trolling me.
Do it again and it's the bozo bin for you.
--
klaatu virada nicto
On 06/06/2011 09:52 AM, Indi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 09:42:01AM -0700, kashani wrote:
I'd like to point out that the PEBCAK was on your end.
Sorry, no.
And you just used your one shot at trolling me.
Do it again and it's the bozo bin for you.
Well, Indi, you are now right
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 10:16:12AM -0700, Bill Longman wrote:
On 06/06/2011 09:52 AM, Indi wrote:
On Mon, Jun 06, 2011 at 09:42:01AM -0700, kashani wrote:
I'd like to point out that the PEBCAK was on your end.
Sorry, no.
And you just used your one shot at trolling me.
Do it
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 04:35:46PM -0700, walt wrote:
Thunderbird is my every-day news and email client and I don't switch because
it just works for me.
Oh that reminds me, one of the annoyances which seems to be common among
GUI MUAs is they create a fixed set of IMAP folders which one is
Am 05.06.2011 11:29, schrieb Indi:
Oh that reminds me, one of the annoyances which seems to be common among
GUI MUAs is they create a fixed set of IMAP folders which one is then
stuck with whether or not they correspond to the IMAP structure
already established. Does t-bird still do that?
Apparently, though unproven, at 01:58 on Sunday 05 June 2011, Volker Armin
Hemmann did opine thusly:
On Saturday 04 June 2011 23:53:50 Mick wrote:
... as mud!
This reply of yours (unlike your previous) is shown as a new thread in
Knode, not as a threaded reply to Dale's message. :@
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 01:00:01 +0200, Mick wrote about [gentoo-user] Re:
Threads changing Was: OT: website design:
David W Noon wrote:
[snip]
I hope all is clear now.
... as mud!
This reply of yours (unlike your previous) is shown as a new thread in
Knode, not as a threaded reply to Dale's
On 06/04/2011 02:59 PM, Indi wrote:
Maybe I'll put the next person who complains about evolution on
thunderbird and see how they do with it...
I absolutely love Thunderbird, but with one caveat...
I love it because of its stability, how well it does IMAP, but most
importantly, how
On Sunday 05 Jun 2011 16:48:19 David W Noon wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 01:00:01 +0200, Mick wrote about [gentoo-user] Re:
Threads changing Was: OT: website design:
David W Noon wrote:
[snip]
I hope all is clear now.
... as mud!
This reply of yours (unlike your previous) is shown
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 08:20:01PM +0200, Mick wrote:
The Usenet headers do not show any X-Original-References: in your message, at
least not in my Knode.
They do, but apparently knode isn't showing you all headers.
The email headers also do not show any X-Original-References: at least in
On Sunday 05 Jun 2011 19:35:52 Indi wrote:
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 08:20:01PM +0200, Mick wrote:
The Usenet headers do not show any X-Original-References: in your
message, at least not in my Knode.
They do, but apparently knode isn't showing you all headers.
Well, under View source it
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 08:17:53PM +0100, Mick wrote:
On Sunday 05 Jun 2011 19:35:52 Indi wrote:
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 08:20:01PM +0200, Mick wrote:
The Usenet headers do not show any X-Original-References: in your
message, at least not in my Knode.
They do, but apparently knode
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:36 on Sunday 05 June 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
This post was done that way, so let me know.
:)
This post only shows:
Message-ID: 20110605183552.ga23...@gaurahari.merseine.nu
Yes, but does it appear correctly threaded?
Yes,
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:20:01 +0200, Mick wrote about Re: [gentoo-user]
Re: Threads changing Was: OT: website design:
[snip]
This is what Knode is showing as header references in your message
that I thereafter responded using Knode and news.gmane.org:
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
Bingo
David W Noon wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 20:20:01 +0200, Mick wrote about Re: [gentoo-user]
Re: Threads changing Was: OT: website design:
[snip]
This is what Knode is showing as header references in your message
that I thereafter responded using Knode and news.gmane.org:
Path
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David W Noon wrote:
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 21:30:01 +0200, Mick wrote about Re: [gentoo-user]
Threads changing Was: OT: website design:
On Sunday 05 Jun 2011 19:59:59 David W Noon wrote:
[snip]
Are we all confused enough for this weekend? ... :-)
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 17:06:28 -0500, Dale wrote about Re: [gentoo-user]
Re: Threads changing Was: OT: website design:
[snip]
By the way, your reply started a new thread, either yours or the
previous message broke something.
That's because I was replying to Mick's message from the NNTP server
David W Noon wrote:
Well, I'm glad we have sorted out the mystery. I don't know if we can
get the sysadmin to fix the rogue newsserver.
I know one thing, ya'll beat it to death trying to figure out what was
breaking it. You are likely right tho, they may not care if it is fixed
or
On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 23:20:22 +0100, Mick wrote about [gentoo-user] Re:
Threads changing Was: OT: website design:
I guess next step is to contact the offending NNTP server admin and
ask them to fix their header munging algorithms?
I wouldn't hold my breath.
PS. This is sent via Knode
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 10:16:01PM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 21:36 on Sunday 05 June 2011, Indi did opine
thusly:
This post was done that way, so let me know.
:)
This post only shows:
Message-ID:
On 06/05/2011 11:51 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 06/04/2011 02:59 PM, Indi wrote:
Maybe I'll put the next person who complains about evolution on
thunderbird and see how they do with it...
I absolutely love Thunderbird, but with one caveat...
I love it because of its stability, how well it does
David W Noon wrote:
On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 22:10:02 +0200, Dale wrote about Re: [gentoo-user]
Threads changing Was: OT: website design:
[snip]
Well, something works now. This is threaded as it should be. So,
whatever you are doing, keep doing it that away. lol
I don't want you to think I
Mick wrote:
... as mud!
This reply of yours (unlike your previous) is shown as a new thread in
Knode, not as a threaded reply to Dale's message. :@
PS. I'm responding using Knode and news.gmane.org as an NNTP server, to see
what difference this may make.
Interesting. Here the thread
On 06/04/2011 02:59 PM, Indi wrote:
On Sat, Jun 04, 2011 at 11:44:30PM +0200, Sebastian Beßler wrote:
Am 04.06.2011 23:10, schrieb Indi:
Every single GUI MUA I ever tried would lock up and become unresponsive
at times when dealing with IMAP.
I use Thunderbird and IMAP for 3 years now and in
On Saturday 04 June 2011 23:53:50 Mick wrote:
... as mud!
This reply of yours (unlike your previous) is shown as a new thread in
Knode, not as a threaded reply to Dale's message. :@
PS. I'm responding using Knode and news.gmane.org as an NNTP server, to see
what difference this may
On Sun, Jun 05, 2011 at 01:58:12AM +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Saturday 04 June 2011 23:53:50 Mick wrote:
... as mud!
This reply of yours (unlike your previous) is shown as a new thread in
Knode, not as a threaded reply to Dale's message. :@
PS. I'm responding using
30 matches
Mail list logo
