On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 16:37:57 -0400,
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>
> On 2017-08-09 08:31, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > So, bug #627244 is relevant after all.
> >
> > I don't have doc in make.conf, so it should just work for me [murmurs a
> > belief-neutral invocation/]
>
> And it did work with no problem
On 2017-08-09 08:31, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> So, bug #627244 is relevant after all.
>
> I don't have doc in make.conf, so it should just work for me [murmurs a
> belief-neutral invocation/]
And it did work with no problems.
So John - your "doc" USE flag is almost certainly what ails you.
--
Pl
On 2017-08-09 02:35, John Covici wrote:
> whoosh was looking for
> raise DistributionNotFound(req, requirers)
> pkg_resources.DistributionNotFound: The 'sphinxcontrib-websupport'
> distribution was not found and is required by Sphinx
> So, I emerged that, but I had to use --nodeps
On 09/08/2017 08:35, John Covici wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Aug 2017 00:06:08 -0400,
> Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>>
>> On 2017-07-29 11:23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>>
>>> On 29/07/2017 10:51, John Covici wrote:
Hi. In my latest world update, portage wants to include this new
package dev-python/whoosh.
On Wed, 09 Aug 2017 00:06:08 -0400,
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
>
> On 2017-07-29 11:23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> > On 29/07/2017 10:51, John Covici wrote:
> > > Hi. In my latest world update, portage wants to include this new
> > > package dev-python/whoosh. The package fails to compile and googling
On 2017-07-29 11:23, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On 29/07/2017 10:51, John Covici wrote:
> > Hi. In my latest world update, portage wants to include this new
> > package dev-python/whoosh. The package fails to compile and googling
> > and searching bgo yields nothing.
> >
> > Any assistance would be
6 matches
Mail list logo