On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 04:17:11PM +0100, Penguin Lover Holly Bostick squawked:
(how do you get ls to also include the @#$%#$ *year*??)
Sorry, couldn't help with the rest of your problem, but I think it is
assumed that ls will display the year only for files older than a year
old. Quite clever,
Willie Wong schreef:
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 04:17:11PM +0100, Penguin Lover Holly Bostick
squawked:
(how do you get ls to also include the @#$%#$ *year*??)
Sorry, couldn't help with the rest of your problem, but I think it is
assumed that ls will display the year only for files older
Holly Bostick:
[...]
Sorry, couldn't help with the rest of your problem, but I think
it is assumed that ls will display the year only for files older
than a year old. Quite clever, in my opinion.
OK, I see what you mean-- or maybe I don't:
[...]
I see that many files that are more than
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 08:37:12PM +0100, Penguin Lover Sergio Polini squawked:
May be, you could add a command-line option ;-)
And don't forget to open a bug and send in a patch! =)
W
--
Ugh! It's 1/2 C U ^2, saved by the bell, we've ran out of time.
~Prof. Kirk T. McDonald, DeathEM,
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 08:01:25PM +0100, Penguin Lover Holly Bostick squawked:
Rather than go off on a rant, I will ask mildly: is there any way to
change the default behaviour to more reflect my expected behaviour? Not
so much asking you to tell me how to do it as asking if those of you who
On 2006-01-07 20:01:25 +0100 (Sat, Jan), Holly Bostick wrote:
Willie Wong schreef:
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 04:17:11PM +0100, Penguin Lover Holly Bostick
squawked:
(how do you get ls to also include the @#$%#$ *year*??)
Sorry, couldn't help with the rest of your problem, but I
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 09:56:59PM +0100, Penguin Lover Mariusz P?kala squawked:
info ls, section * Formatting file timestamps::
A timestamp is considered to be recent if it is less than six
months old, and is not dated in the future.
and further:
For example, `--time-style=+%Y-%m-%d
Mariusz Pękala schreef:
On 2006-01-07 20:01:25 +0100 (Sat, Jan), Holly Bostick wrote:
Willie Wong schreef:
On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 04:17:11PM +0100, Penguin Lover Holly
Bostick squawked:
(how do you get ls to also include the @#$%#$ *year*??)
Sorry, couldn't help with the rest of
On 1/7/06, Holly Bostick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't think I really need the inodes (if that's what they are, I
That is link count. For a regular file, it tells how many hard
links exist to the file. For a directory, it tells how many files are
in that directory +2, since . and .. count as
Richard Fish schreef:
On 1/7/06, Holly Bostick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Don't think I really need the inodes (if that's what they are, I
That is link count. For a regular file, it tells how many hard
links exist to the file. For a directory, it tells how many files
are in that
On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 02:41:35AM +0100, Penguin Lover Holly Bostick squawked:
A-HA The 'Info' command, which I also always forget, not least
because I don't know how to navigate info files.
But this caused me to take another whack at it, and I got along well
enough to find a mostly
11 matches
Mail list logo
