walt wrote:
> On 07/25/2012 05:21 PM, Dale wrote:
>
>> The point made about producing less heat with the smaller nm sounds
>> reasonable tho.
> >From the chip maker's point of view, everything is about battery life
> and small size these days. I wonder how many college kids are using
> desktops t
On 07/25/2012 05:21 PM, Dale wrote:
> The point made about producing less heat with the smaller nm sounds
> reasonable tho.
>From the chip maker's point of view, everything is about battery life
and small size these days. I wonder how many college kids are using
desktops these days. Desktops a
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 7:33 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 25/07/12 23:05, Philip Webb wrote:
>>
>> Isn't 22 nm going to be faster than 32 nm ?
>> [...]
>>
>> How do you compare cores vs nm ?
>> How far is cache size important ( 6 vs 8 MB )?
>
>
> You simply ignore all that stuff and look
On 25/07/12 23:05, Philip Webb wrote:
Isn't 22 nm going to be faster than 32 nm ?
[...]
How do you compare cores vs nm ?
How far is cache size important ( 6 vs 8 MB )?
You simply ignore all that stuff and look at how fast the CPUs are.
Some 45nm CPUs are faster than some 32nm and 22nm ones
4 matches
Mail list logo
