On Wednesday 04 July 2007 02:09:43 Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote:
David Relson wrote:
Why is emerge giving me 2.9.2 rather than the newer 2.10.0_rc1 ???
try emerge -upv claws-mail
If you omit -u (means --upgrade), you will re-emerge currently installed
version.
-u means direct deps will
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
-u means direct deps will be updated too and that the target (in this case
claws-mail) won't be remerged unless there's an upgrade (or downgrade).
Without -u it still merges the latest visible version of the target
On Thursday 05 July 2007 20:07:58 Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote:
-u means direct deps will be updated too and that the target (in this
case claws-mail) won't be remerged unless there's an upgrade (or
downgrade). Without -u it still merges the latest visible version of the
target itself..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
Why are you posting this? Was I unclear about anything?
Nevermind, man.
- --
Arturo Buanzo Busleiman - Consultor Independiente en Seguridad Informatica
¿Su empresa consume demasiado ancho de banda? ¡Consulteme!
Free (as
Hello David Relson,
Because it is hard-masked in package.mask ;-) If you really want it
you can unmask it in /etc/portage/package.unmask
At present, /etc/portage only has package.keywords. As package.mask is
not present, it's not hard masked.
It is masked in
David Relson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As I want the latest and greatest version of claws-mail
in /etc/portage/package.keywords I have:
mail-client/claws-mail
Should'nt that be
mail-client/claws-mail ~x86
?
HTH,
Roger
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Wed, 04 Jul 2007 07:27:54 -0230, Roger Mason wrote:
As I want the latest and greatest version of claws-mail
in /etc/portage/package.keywords I have:
mail-client/claws-mail
Should'nt that be
mail-client/claws-mail ~x86
Why assume that everyone runs x86? If you don't specify
Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why assume that everyone runs x86? If you don't specify an arch in
package.keywords, if defaults to ~whatever-arch-you-have-in-make.conf
Thanks, learned something new.
Roger
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 08:48:45 +0100
Neil Bothwick wrote:
Hello David Relson,
Because it is hard-masked in package.mask ;-) If you really want
it you can unmask it in /etc/portage/package.unmask
At present, /etc/portage only has package.keywords. As
package.mask is not present, it's
As I want the latest and greatest version of claws-mail
in /etc/portage/package.keywords I have:
mail-client/claws-mail
In directory /usr/portage/mail-client/claws-mail there are 3 ebuilds:
claws-mail-2.9.1.ebuild
claws-mail-2.9.2.ebuild
claws-mail-2.10.0_rc1.ebuild
Their
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
David Relson wrote:
Why is emerge giving me 2.9.2 rather than the newer 2.10.0_rc1 ???
try emerge -upv claws-mail
If you omit -u (means --upgrade), you will re-emerge currently installed
version.
- --
Arturo Buanzo Busleiman - Consultor
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 19:48:01 -0400 David Relson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is emerge giving me 2.9.2 rather than the newer 2.10.0_rc1 ???
Because it is hard-masked in package.mask ;-) If you really want it you
can unmask it in /etc/portage/package.unmask
Cheers,
Renat
--
Probleme kann man
On Tue, 03 Jul 2007 21:09:43 -0300
Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
David Relson wrote:
Why is emerge giving me 2.9.2 rather than the newer 2.10.0_rc1 ???
try emerge -upv claws-mail
If you omit -u (means --upgrade), you will re-emerge
On Wed, 4 Jul 2007 02:48:46 +0200
Renat Golubchyk wrote:
On Tue, 3 Jul 2007 19:48:01 -0400 David Relson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why is emerge giving me 2.9.2 rather than the newer 2.10.0_rc1 ???
Because it is hard-masked in package.mask ;-) If you really want it
you can unmask it in
14 matches
Mail list logo
