On 12/31/05, Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sunday 01 January 2006 02:57, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:> Oh, and yes, java is ~x86 both in unmask and in keywords.Can you list exactly what sun-jdk lines you have in/etc/portage/package.{unmask,keywords} please?
Of course.
Oops!!! I thought I c
Summary: I'm running java 1.5, I also have 1.4 emerged.On 12/31/05, Abhay Kedia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 31 December 2005 22:47, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:>> The question now seems to be: why doesn't db use Java
1.5?>Yup and it is weird. I have jdk 1.5 installed and when I tried to use +j
On Sunday 01 January 2006 02:57, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> Oh, and yes, java is ~x86 both in unmask and in keywords.
Can you list exactly what sun-jdk lines you have in
/etc/portage/package.{unmask,keywords} please?
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sunday 01 January 2006 02:39, Holly Bostick wrote:
> And iirc, the virtual is not going to be linked to a hard-masked package
> (or at least it most likely is not atm, or the hard-masked packages are
> listed after the stable packages).
>
> So what I would do is check /var/cache/edb/virtuals and
On Saturday 31 December 2005 22:47, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>
> The question now seems to be: why doesn't db use Java 1.5?
>
Yup and it is weird. I have jdk 1.5 installed and when I tried to use +java
for db it didn't ask me to install older version.
# USE=java emerge -pv sun-jdk db
These are th
Oh, and yes, java is ~x86 both in unmask and in keywords.-- Kevin O'Gorman, PhD
Kevin O'Gorman schreef:
> Synopsis: I do have java 1.5 unmasked. I need it for the classes I
> teach. So why doesn't db use java 1.5?
>
> On 12/31/05, Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Jason Stubbs schreef:
>>
>>> On Saturday 31 December 2005 21:57, Holly Bostick wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>
Synopsis: I do have java 1.5 unmasked. I need it for the classes I teach.
So why doesn't db use java 1.5?
On 12/31/05, Holly Bostick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jason Stubbs schreef:> On Saturday 31 December 2005 21:57, Holly Bostick wrote:>>> If you look at the output>>>
[nomerge ]
On Saturday 31 December 2005 23:53, Holly Bostick wrote:
> Jason Stubbs schreef:
> > On Saturday 31 December 2005 21:57, Holly Bostick wrote:
> > Anyway, my latest emerge world failed because of sun-jdk-1.4.2.10
> > (!!!). The current one is 1.5 something.
>
> Meaning (to me) that Kevin is referri
Jason Stubbs schreef:
> On Saturday 31 December 2005 21:57, Holly Bostick wrote:
>
>> If you look at the output
>>
>>
>>> [nomerge ] sys-libs/db-4.2.52_p2-r1 -bootstrap +doc
>>> +java -nocxx +tcltk
>>
>> the reason db is calling for java is because you have the "java"
>> USE flag s
On Saturday 31 December 2005 21:57, Holly Bostick wrote:
> If you look at the output
>
> > [nomerge ] sys-libs/db-4.2.52_p2-r1 -bootstrap +doc +java
> > -nocxx +tcltk
>
> the reason db is calling for java is because you have the "java" USE
> flag set for db.
>
> Do you really need db to
Kevin O'Gorman schreef:
> On 12/30/05, Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Saturday 31 December 2005 13:58, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
>>
>>> Or should I say portage as a whole. Anyway, my latest emerge
>>> world failed because of sun-jdk-1.4.2.10 (!!!). The current one
>>> is 1.5 someth
> > On Saturday 31 December 2005 13:58, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> > > Or should I say portage as a whole. Anyway, my latest emerge world
> > > failed because of sun-jdk-1.4.2.10 (!!!). The current one is 1.5
> > > something. The weird part is that I cannot find any reason for that
> > > package to
On 12/30/05, Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Saturday 31 December 2005 13:58, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:> Or should I say portage as a whole. Anyway, my latest emerge world> failed because of sun-jdk-1.4.2.10 (!!!). The current one is 1.5> something. The weird part is that I cannot find any
On Saturday 31 December 2005 13:58, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
> Or should I say portage as a whole. Anyway, my latest emerge world
> failed because of sun-jdk-1.4.2.10 (!!!). The current one is 1.5
> something. The weird part is that I cannot find any reason for that package
> to be emerged.
> 1) the
Or should I say portage as a whole. Anyway, my latest emerge world
failed because of sun-jdk-1.4.2.10 (!!!). The current one is 1.5 something.
The weird part is that I cannot find any reason for that package to
be emerged.
1) the world file contains just "sun-jdk"
2) "equery depends =sun-jdk-1.4.
16 matches
Mail list logo
