Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com writes:
In general, you can assume portage will never delete any config files
or anything from /etc without your involvement (either manually or
with etc-update or similar).
Do any of the config tools, etc-update, dispatch-conf, cfg-update etc,
ever
On Thursday 26 May 2011 05:49:21 Valmor de Almeida wrote:
On 05/25/2011 04:46 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Valmor de Almeida val.gen...@gmail.com
wrote:
Should these have been eliminated or do I need to do it by hand or
something else still needs it?
I
Apparently, though unproven, at 11:50 on Thursday 26 May 2011, Mick did opine
thusly:
On Thursday 26 May 2011 05:49:21 Valmor de Almeida wrote:
On 05/25/2011 04:46 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Valmor de Almeida
val.gen...@gmail.com
wrote:
Should these
On Thursday 26 May 2011 11:30:12 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 11:50 on Thursday 26 May 2011, Mick did
opine
thusly:
On Thursday 26 May 2011 05:49:21 Valmor de Almeida wrote:
On 05/25/2011 04:46 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Valmor de
Apparently, though unproven, at 13:27 on Thursday 26 May 2011, Mick did opine
thusly:
I just had a look and noticed that haldaemon is added as a user to a
load of groups. The group 'cdrw' only has haldaemon as a user. What
shall I do with it?
# less /etc/group | grep haldaemon
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 7:27 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
[snip]
You should still delete it.
I assume you mean just the haldaemon, not the group cdrw, right?
Then I leave the cdrw empty with no users, correct?
--
Regards,
Mick
This is what I did.
--
Valmor
On Thursday 26 May 2011 17:29:34 Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 13:27 on Thursday 26 May 2011, Mick did
opine
thusly:
I just had a look and noticed that haldaemon is added as a user to a
load of groups. The group 'cdrw' only has haldaemon as a user. What
Hello,
I have eliminated hal long ago and noted recently in my group list that
I have a haldaemon group
haldaemon:x:104:haldaemon
and a user
haldaemon:x:102:104:added by portage for hal:/dev/null:/sbin/nologin
Should these have been eliminated or do I need to do it by hand or
something
Apparently, though unproven, at 22:37 on Wednesday 25 May 2011, Valmor de
Almeida did opine thusly:
Hello,
I have eliminated hal long ago and noted recently in my group list that
I have a haldaemon group
haldaemon:x:104:haldaemon
and a user
haldaemon:x:102:104:added by portage
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Valmor de Almeida val.gen...@gmail.com wrote:
Should these have been eliminated or do I need to do it by hand or
something else still needs it?
I think you should do it by hand.
In general, you can assume portage will never delete any config files
or anything
On 05/25/2011 04:46 PM, Paul Hartman wrote:
On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Valmor de Almeida val.gen...@gmail.com
wrote:
Should these have been eliminated or do I need to do it by hand or
something else still needs it?
I think you should do it by hand.
In general, you can assume
11 matches
Mail list logo
